Huns: The Origin

Brief Summary

This video explores the history of the Huns, from their possible origins as the Xiongnu in ancient China to their impact on the Roman Empire and their eventual fragmentation. It examines their culture, religion, economy, and military tactics, challenging common perceptions and offering a more nuanced understanding of this enigmatic steppe people.

  • The Huns may have originated from the Xiongnu who fought the Han Chinese.
  • They likely practiced a form of animism, possibly worshipping a sky-god called Tengri.
  • Their economy was agro-pastoralist, combining nomadic herding with agriculture.
  • After Attila's death, the Hunnic Empire fragmented due to internal conflicts and external pressures.
  • Hunnic mercenaries continued to play a significant role in Eastern Roman armies for almost a century.

Introduction

The video introduces the Huns as a significant nomadic group from the Eurasian steppe, known for their military prowess and impact on empires, particularly the Roman Empire. Under Attila, they became synonymous with ferocity. The video aims to explore their origins, lifestyle, religious beliefs, and culture, addressing the many questions surrounding this enigmatic group.

Hunnic Origins

The video addresses the question of the Huns' origins, contrasting Roman perceptions with modern scholarship. Roman accounts suggest the Huns emerged from beyond the Straits of Kerch, encountering the Goths. However, the video proposes a connection to the Xiongnu, who fought the Han Chinese centuries earlier. While a direct blood relation is debated, the Huns likely adopted the Xiongnu name for its political and cultural significance, similar to the Holy Roman Empire's adoption of the "Roman" name.

Xiongnu Survival and Expansion

The fragmentation of the Xiongnu Empire due to pressure from the Han Chinese and other nomadic groups didn't eliminate them. They survived near the Altai Mountains, facing pressure from various powers. The decline of these powers in the 3rd century allowed the Xiongnu-Huns to expand into Central Asia and eventually Europe, encountering the Roman Empire. Archaeological evidence suggests their presence in the Ural Mountains by the early 4th century, indicating control over a vast territory. By the 370s, they appeared in Greco-Roman records, defeating the Alans and Gothic tribes.

Hunnic Religion

The video explores the religious beliefs of the Huns, noting that while Roman sources claimed they had no religion, this is unlikely. It is inferred that they were animists, revering natural forces like wind, snow, and thunder, believing each possessed a spirit. Similar to the Mongols, they likely worshipped a sky-god, Tenger or Tengri, placated by shamans. Evidence includes a Roman general performing a divination ceremony to please Hunnic auxiliaries. Another theory suggests they worshipped a sacred sword as a proxy for a war god.

Hunnic Economy

The video examines the Hunnic economy, challenging the perception that steppe empires didn't practice agriculture. The Hunnic Empire is described as "agro-pastoralist," with both nomadic herders and sedentary farmers. Nomads practiced animal husbandry, hunting, and fishing, alternating between summer pastures and winter quarters. Sheep were a key animal, providing milk, cheese, and wool. Silk and wine became crucial to the Hunnic economy through interactions with the Roman Empire, obtained through raiding, tribute, and trade.

The Fragmentation of the Hunnic Empire

The video discusses the aftermath of Attila's death, which triggered a civil war among his sons and Hunnic nobles. The conflict likely occurred between eastern and western Hunnic factions, with the western faction led by the Gepids and the eastern faction by the Akatziri tribe. The Battle of Nedao in 454 AD saw Ardaric, king of the Gepids, defeat and kill Ellac, Attila's eldest son. This war is interpreted not as a Germanic revolt, but as a conflict between "Germano-Huns," suggesting cultural hybridisation.

Hunnic Legacy

The Akatziri faction lost due to a pincer movement from the Gepid-led faction and the Oghurs. Attila's youngest son, Ernakh, salvaged the eastern remnant, forming the Bulgar Huns. This group remained formidable, serving as foederati and mercenaries in Eastern Roman armies for almost a century. Hunnic horsemen were renowned for their military prowess, influencing Roman cavalry tactics. The Byzantines' success often depended on their Hunnic allies, highlighting the Huns' continued military significance even after Attila's death.

Summarize any YouTube video in seconds

Get summaries like this one for any video, in your language, with the free Summ app.

Download on the App Store
Get it on Google Play

Transcript

YouTube Transcript Generator

0:06 Throughout history, the nomadic peoples of the Eurasian steppe have played a key role in the rise and fall of empires, from the Seljuk Turks of Alp Arslan to the great Mongol host of Genghis Khan. Unique military tactics and a stunning series of victories against the settled civilisations have immortalized the people of the steppe in the minds of many, but one steppe people in particular are well known to us. The Huns pushed west during the mid-fourth century, causing a series of domino effects which would eventually help bring down the Roman Empire in the west. Under their leader - Attila, the Huns became a byword for ferocity and ruthlessness for millennia afterwards, but where did this enigmatic people

0:51 come from and how did they live their lives? What gods did they worship and what was their culture? Welcome to our video on the mighty Huns. Shoutout to Rise of Kingdoms for sponsoring this video! Sponsors like this allow our channel to produce more and better content, so downloading of Rise of Kingdoms FROM OUR LINK would really help us out ! Rise of Kingdoms is a Free to play mobile game, with millions of players all over the world and it gives you an opportunity to be the founder of your very own kingdom, to start epic wars and conquer the world! And its cross-guild warfare makes the wars that much exciting! In Rise of Kingdoms you will battle against millions of real players anywhere, any time! All game actions take place on a huge continuous map full of players

1:40 and NPCs, as its never before seen on mobile infinite zoom feature lets the battles happen without separate battle maps. Rise of Kingdoms has stunning graphics and beautiful 3d character models and allows you to lead 11 civilizations, each with unique buildings, troops and features, from the Stone Age to the feudalism, recruit historical characters like Caesar, Hannibal and others! To support our channel, by downloading Rise of Kingdoms through our link AND using the giftcode, you will receive 200 Gem, 2*Silver Key, 100.000 Food, 100.000 Wood! The Romans had popular but ultimately incorrect ideas about where the mysterious Huns came from, shown in such sources as those left to us by Sozomen, Zosimus, Jordanes and Procopius.

2:31 According to the standard tale, the Huns and the Germanic Goths lived side by side with one another for centuries without even knowing it, separated by the Straits of Kerch. Each nation believed there was no land over the horizon, until one day. At this point the story diverges into two forms, but the general message is clear. One version relates how a cow belonging to a Hun herdsman was stung by a gadfly and fled through the marshy water to the opposite shore. The herdsman followed his animal in hopes of retrieving it, and instead found land to the west where he believed none existed before. After retrieving his wayward cattle, the man returned to Hunnic lands and told his countrymen. The other account

3:19 states that a Hunnic hunter in pursuit of a stag was led across the straits by their fleeing prey and was amazed by the mild climate and fertile soil in the land he encountered. Whatever the case, the Huns soon crossed the straits after discovering the landmass’ existence and barrelled into the Gothic inhabitants of the Crimean Peninsula. Where the Huns truly came from originally is a controversial question, and to examine it properly we must travel far to the east, to the borders of China - centuries before Atilla ascended to the role of chieftain. In the 18th century a Jesuit priest named Joseph de Deguignes came up with the idea that the European Huns which devastated Rome in the fifth century were the same people as the even more ancient Xiongnu - who had

4:09 fought titanic wars with the Han Chinese centuries before. Since this first proposition, the debate has raged for centuries, and by using recent scholarship we can almost conclusively state the relationship between the two peoples. Various sources from the ancient Chinese region, authored by people from diverse origins as Sogdian merchants and buddhists monks, have dubbed the Xiongnu as translations of Huns, or Huna. Therefore, it has been concluded that there must be a connection of some kind between the two, but the nature of this connection is perhaps even more interesting than we previously thought. The implication for centuries has been that the Huns are blood related, but the established

4:54 link between the names does not definitively prove this. Steppe confederations such as the Huns are almost always multilingual and multi-ethnic, which means that attempting to determine blood relation is a difficult task. In the early empire of Genghis Khan for example, the 90,000 troops he led into China consisted of a primarily mongol high command, and a myriad of other steppe tribes, such as Merkits, Keraites, Naimans and many more. What is more noteworthy is that the later European Huns of Attila chose to use the name of the Imperial Xiongnu as their own name, much like the Holy Roman Empire dubbed themselves Roman to inherit the greatness of the old Empire. This is clearly an indication

5:42 that the Huns valued this link with the old eastern steppe, and this political and cultural heritage of the Huns is key to understanding the connections between them and the Xiongnu of old, rather than direct descent. The fragmentation of the once powerful Xiongnu Empire by combined pressure from the Han Chinese and other rival nomadic groups such as the Xianbei might have knocked them down from their formerly lofty status, but it did not finish them off. Far from being finished, the Xiongnu Huns survived in the vicinity of the Altai mountains, away from mainstream Chinese and Greco-Roman sources. Though they had survived destruction, the Xiongnu were in a desperate situation during the first and second centuries, surrounded as they were

6:29 by hostile powers all around their home in the Altai mountains. To the west and south, Kangju, Dingling and Wusun tribes, in addition to the Kushan Empire exerted pressure. To the east, the Xianbei and Han dynasty were driving the Xiongnu out of their former eastern lands. This situation changed during the third century, when the strong powers who hemmed them in began to decline. The Han descended into their three kingdoms period, the various other nomadic tribes began to fragment and the Kushans started to disintegrate. It was this weakness in their neighbors which allowed the Xiongnu Huns to expand both into Central Asia and eventually and more famously into Europe, where they would come into contact

7:16 with the Roman Empire. Archaeological evidence from the Ural mountains shows us that by the early 4th century at the latest, the Huns had expanded that far west, implying that all the states and tribes between the Altai and the Urals were subject to the resurgent Xiongnu, who should now be considered the European Huns of popular imagination. By the 370s, the Huns first emerge on the horizons of Greco-Roman sources, when they famously defeated the Alans, as well as the Greuthungi and Thervingi Goths. Instead of going over the better known aspects of Hunnic history, we will diverge to some of the less well known aspects of the Huns themselves, beginning with the predominant religion among their people. Roman soldier and historian Ammianus Marcellinus stated

8:05 that the Huns had no religion, but this seems incredibly unlikely. What the Huns exactly believed and how exactly they worshipped is unknown, but it can be inferred that they were animists. They were likely reverent of the natural forces and elements of the world, such as wind, snow, rain, thunder, lightning and others, and probably believed each possessed a spirit. Like the infamous Mongols many centuries later, it is probable that the Huns perceived the origins of these myriad forces in the sky, worshipping heaven above as the font of all creation and using sacrifice and worship in an attempt to control their own destiny. This sky-god has a name by which Turkish and Mongol tribes knew it, and which is also familiar

8:54 to many modern people - Tenger, or Tengri, a god which tribal shamans would placate with their chants, drums and spirit guides. Evidence is very scarce for Hunnic religiosity, but there are a few notable occurrences. In the year 439, just before a battle against a Visigothic army, the Roman general decided to please his Hunnic auxiliaries by performing a ceremony of divination, a traditionally Tengriist practice. This is the mostly accepted modern viewpoint on the Hunnic religion, but it is not the only one. The most outlandish and exotic sounding of all the possibilities is that the Huns worshipped a sacred sword. In this interpretation, the worship of the sword is a sort of proxy for the true worship of a war god, the nomadic

9:44 equivalent of Ares or Mars in the Greco-Roman world. As a mark of this worship, many nomadic and settled peoples alike ‘swore on their swords’ as if it were witnessing the oath. In an economic sense, the common perception of Hun-like steppe empires is that agriculture is not practiced at all. However, new evidence has emerged which suggests that this might not have been the case. Instead, the designation ‘agro-pastoralist’ has been placed on the Hunnic Empire, as it possessed both a large pastoralist nomad population and sedentary agriculturalists - that is, farmers. The nomads tended to alternate between summer pastures and winter quarters depending on the time of year and climate, in order to partake in

10:32 the traditional steppe lifestyles such as animal husbandry, hunting and fishing. Jordanes provides us with an example of this pastoralist lifestyle - the Hunnic Altziagiri tribe. They pastured near Cherson in the Crimea in the summer, where their cattle could find plentiful food, and migrated north of the Black Sea in winter, where ‘reeds’ apparently provided good animal fodder. Though it is not mentioned in the sources, a key animal kept by Hunnic nomads would have been the sheep, which is capable of providing milk, cheese and crucial wool. During their interactions with the Roman Empire, two mediterranean products in particular became a crucial part of the Hun economy - silk and wine. The Huns would often obtain highly desired

11:19 Roman silk by raiding Imperial territory and exacting tribute, but they also traded goods such as furs and steppe horses for it. While the Huns did not drink wine during their migration west, this was probably because they did not have access to it, rather than any cultural aversion to the drink. We know this because they took to the traditional Roman beverage perhaps too much after they entered modern Hungary. At banquets organised between Huns and Roman diplomats, wine would be liberally consumed after the first course and the second course. After the Romans left, the Huns would keep on drinking late into the night. All this meant that during the high-point of the Hunnic Empire under Attila, vast quantities of wine was exported to their lands from Rome.

12:08 Now that we have discussed some of the aspects of Hunnic life during their time in Rome’s vicinity, we shall discuss how the Huns transitioned into different forms after Attila’s death. That death triggered a bitter civil war between many of Attila’s sons and other powerful Hunnic nobles, who fought over the grand inheritance he had left behind. The nature of this civil war is hazy, but it probably occurred between two coalitions - the Hunnic lands of the east and west, the latter of which Attila had favoured during his reign. The western faction, with its power base centred in the Carpathian basin, was led by the semi-Germanic Gepids. They were only semi-Germanic because by the 450s, it is widely believed that the Gepid elite

12:55 was almost identical to the Hunnic elite due to intermarriage and other cultural blending. The eastern coalition was headed by the Hunnic Akatziri tribe located in modern Ukraine, who had been disempowered due to supporting Bleda against Attila before the latter killed the former. The key battle in this civil war took place in 454AD at Nedao, where Ardaric - king of the Gepids, defeated and killed Ellac - the eldest of Attila’s sons and the chief of the Akatziri. Though it is common to see this war as a Germanic revolt against Hunnic overlordship, it seems instead that those ‘Germanic’ leaders were in fact Hun princes, who had been culturally hybridised to almost become something like Germano-Huns.

13:42 Interestingly, this might have been a conscious policy by the Hun aristocracy to ease integration of the formerly independent Germanic tribal unions to their own rule, and Ardaric himself was likely a member of the highest tier of Hun society. Why did the Akatziri faction lose this battle, despite its greater military strength? During the post-Attila period we can reconstruct what appears to have been an unintentional, but deadly giant pincer which struck the eastern portion of the Hunnic Empire. The Gepid-led faction hit from the west and a more threatening assault from a new nomadic group - the Oghurs, came from the eastern steppe. The task of salvaging the eastern remnant was left to

14:29 Attila’s youngest son, known as Ernakh, who eventually succeeded and founded the political entity which would become associated with the ‘Bulgar’ Huns. Militarily this group was still extremely formidable, and would be used as foederati and mercenaries in Eastern Roman armies for almost a century after. During the Byzantine campaigns against the Vandalic kingdom, 70 Hunnic horsemen reportedly defeated an entire Moorish army. In the conquest of Italy, both Belisarius and Narses would use Hunnic mercenaries as elite shock troops, and the Roman cavalry in the 6th and 7th centuries would try to copy the model of the legendary mobile Hun armies. Victory or defeat in Byzantium’s wars depended on the mood of Hun allies and

15:18 mercenaries. In 531 Emperor Justinian learned that the Huns had defected to join the Persians, but managed to trick the Persians into thinking the Huns were instead marching against them - and they fled in terror, indicating the awe with which the Romans and Persians held the military power of the Huns almost a century after their greatest leader perished. Once again, allow us to thank the sponsor of this video Rise of Kingdoms. This free-to-play mobile strategy games will give you hours of enjoyment and by downloading it, you will support our channel So use the link in the description or pinned comment! We will continue talking about ancient civilizations, so make sure you are subscribed to our channel

16:03 and pressed the bell button. We would like to express our gratitude to our Patreon supporters and channel members, who make the creation of our videos possible. Now, you can also support us by buying our merchandise via the link in the description. This is the Kings and Generals channel, and we will catch you on the next one.

Share

YouTube Video Summaries