Brief Summary
This article discusses the "Council of Peace," an initiative launched by Donald Trump initially aimed at addressing the conflict in Gaza, but now expanding its ambitions on a global scale. The council's structure, membership, and potential impact on international diplomacy are examined, highlighting the controversies and concerns surrounding its role in relation to the United Nations.
- The council was initially created to supervise the ceasefire in Gaza, organise humanitarian aid and manage reconstruction.
- Vladimir Putin has been invited to join the council.
- Several Western allies have expressed reservations, viewing it as a rival to the UN.
Why This Council is Back in the Spotlight
The announcement in Davos that Vladimir Putin is considering joining the "Council of Peace" has brought the initiative back into focus. Putin has confirmed that Russia is considering the American invitation and may contribute the required $1 billion for a permanent seat, potentially using frozen Russian assets in the United States. This prospect has intensified the controversy surrounding the council, which is already under criticism from Western allies who see it as a competitor to the United Nations.
What is the Purpose of the Council of Peace?
The Council of Peace was first introduced in September 2025 as part of Donald Trump's twenty-point plan to end the conflict between Israel and Hamas. The initial goal was to establish a transitional international structure to oversee the ceasefire in Gaza, organise humanitarian aid, and manage the reconstruction of the territory. A UN Security Council resolution in November 2025 provided an official framework for the initiative, but its mandate was strictly limited to Gaza and set to expire at the end of 2027.
Who is in Control?
In January 2026, the White House formalised the composition of the first executive council of the Council of Peace. Key members include US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Middle East Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, and Donald Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as well as former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. A separate body, the "Gaza Executive Board," is responsible for overseeing the reconstruction and civil administration of the Gaza Strip. Notably, there are currently no Palestinian representatives on this board, a point of frequent criticism from international observers.
Which Countries are Participating, and Which are Refusing?
Approximately 35 leaders have reportedly agreed to join the Council of Peace, out of around 50 invitations sent. Participating countries include Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, Turkey, and Hungary, as well as Morocco, Pakistan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Paraguay, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. Conversely, several Western allies have either refused or expressed strong reservations. France, Norway, and Sweden have declined the invitation, deeming the initiative incompatible with the role of the United Nations. Italy has raised legal concerns, while Canada has indicated an agreement "in principle" without a formal commitment. Other key partners, such as the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan, have not yet adopted a public position.
How Does This Council Operate?
The Council of Peace is expected to be permanently chaired by Donald Trump, who will have extensive veto power. He will also have the authority to appoint executive members and designate his successor. Member states will be granted a three-year mandate. To secure a permanent seat, the charter stipulates a payment of $1 billion, intended to finance the council's activities.
Why Does Its Mandate Pose a Problem?
In January 2026, the White House released a charter that significantly broadens the scope of the Council's activities. The document now allows the body to intervene in other conflict zones worldwide, with the stated aim of creating a crisis resolution tool that is faster than existing UN mechanisms. This development has sparked strong reservations in Europe. France, Sweden, and Norway believe that the Council of Peace risks undermining the central role of the United Nations.
