20260421 SRP 40 (06) CHN New

1:01 Trimadraj. Forty. Vishal Budi Madhyasthatarata. Jitendra. At Laguno, the souls of the people. Element, the best character. How is the eligibility revealed? Due to eligibility,

1:51 four types of qualities have been taken here. Vishal buddhi Madhyasta Simplicity and Hitendra Atlaguno, here the qualities are the state. Vishal buddhi is not a quality, but its synonym is also sometimes called a quality. This is because of the qualities which a soul has. developed by making efforts that is, has

2:36 developed. In the period of simplicity Madhyasta rise, those who have manifested these types with effort. In these elements, you can take the element of salvation. You can take all three salvations. You can also take the soul element. Soul element. The best character eligibility is not just a word. The best eligibility is not taken as a mere word. The best eligibility of the yogi with Vishal Budi,

3:24 who, listens to them in bodh or satsang, can grasp them in his knowledge, can accept them, can adopt them. The intellect has been caught in the viva place. Vishalbhuri does not.

4:10 Mean anger feeling, good or bad feeling, In this the intellect has been caught. If there is any insistence on the body, then it increases freedom, etc. Intense rasa is generated. And this intense attachment to philosophy is the attachment to the body and character. Anger, pride, illusion and greed are the result of attachment to character, meaning the cause of limited bondage, not the cause of rotation. However, if there is insistence on this passion, then passion

4:57 arises, and that passion, meaning the rotation of falsehood, is the cause of passion. The place of passion is a mature intellect, a vast intellect, not a mature intellect. Worry. A bound intellect. A restricted intellect. By insistence on one thing, one's knowledge becomes narrowed. Narrowed, meaning it doesn't develop. For

5:44 example, if we Understand that brother, the soul and matter are eternal. From time immemorial to timeless, we are living beings, so we too have existed since time immemorial and will remain forever. Meaning, we will remain, but in our thoughts, we think only till death. Examine your thoughts throughout the day and... Whatever planning you do, you do it till death.

6:33 It is equal, but this is the time equal to a drop in the ocean. How much water is there in the ocean? In that, the 50 year lifespan is just a dot. It's so short. And for 24 hours, we think only about life until death. When someone with a broad mind realizes that they are here to stay, that they are eternal, they also consider the past

7:24 they have endured. They don't just think about present-day pleasures. And where will they be reborn from here? They think about that. Those with a narrow mind, at most, think about old age until death. They have an infinite life beyond that. Millions of lives follow. And

8:11 this life is the cause of that life. This means that your next life is determined by the results of your current life. For example, you can't change your current life. If someone is a woman, they can't become a man. If someone is a man, they can't become a woman. If someone lives in India, they can't live in America. They can't have American parents. You can't change anything right now. Can you change everything about the next bhava right now? When

8:59 we are born in the next bhava, it cannot be changed. Are you understanding anything or not? In this bhava, whatever good and bad feelings are there in us, like anger, etc., our next bhava will be according to that. So if we want our next bhava to be happy, then we should change our result in the present bhava. Otherwise, we should end our entire life by thinking only about this bhava. This requires a vast intellect. Are you understanding or not?

9:56 So after accepting all this and understanding it, accept it and think about your future as well, then only he can make the future happy. Or after the next life starts, the soul cannot make any changes in it. Mumukshu Sol is explaining further with extraordinary curiosity whoever is doing the practice of religion, satsang, swadhyay, etc. He is doing the discussion

10:45 with extraordinary curiosity. That the wise man says good, the good man says good, the guru says good three times. And what do I understand? Only this thought of daughter-in-law is going on inside me. and whoever is with me, family, etc. I am considering that as my permanent relationship.

11:36 Understand, but what does the Guru say that these are not your permanent relationships? Full party, as if I know everything, do it like this. Do it

12:22 I have heard and read all these things many times, then he absorbs only a little or does not absorb anything. After leaving from here, if he thinks that what new thing did I understand today? What changes should I make within me? What changes should happen in me? due to the teachings of the guru and how will I change this or the one who is sitting after doing a blank party. He understands many new things.

13:15 And when he understands by comparing it with the result within himself, then the work of changing it can also begin. of Akash Raki has filled everything in the empty space within himself. All our knowledge of Jinvani and the world is there. No empty space in it for something new to enter?

14:02 If the slate is completely written, How can we write something new? When will we let go of the old? When will we hear new things and compare them with what we understand within ourselves? What is the difference between what we understand and what is being discussed in the satsang? What is the benefit?

14:47 Anyone who has this kind of thinking can shed the old and let the new things enter within them. Call it a vast understanding, a vast intellect, an open mind, an open mind. We should check what new things we have understood within ourselves today, even after listening to the satsang that we did not understand yesterday. We should awaken to the realization that this has come to us today.

15:39 Is this the kind of result we have within ourselves? And should I accept this because it is true? It is beneficial to me. It is profitable. It is blissful. So he can leave the old thing and accept the new thing. And when he accepts many such new things, then the result becomes what Ginvani says. Did you understand? Daily?

16:26 Whatever is coming in Genvani, after accepting most of it within yourself, you should give up your wrong understanding, leave it. There should be no insistence on it. The one with a vast intellect does not have any insistence. When he understands that it is right, then immediately, Even if he has been wanting to accept it for many years, he immediately gets ready to give it up. One must become neutral with a vast intellect. First, yes, one must become neutral. Does this mean that this is a matter of hitting, that is, ignoring the news?

17:17 Yes, become neutral and hit. Do not support the other person. After listening to this, we should neutrally check and understand this. This belief is open because whatever an ignorant being has understood is the reason for his wandering. Because that is ignorance Ignorance is the reason for wandering. If he understands it, then shouldn't he give it importance and insistence?

18:06 And if something new comes which is beneficial for him, then he should immediately understand it and accept it and give up his own views. This is called self-study. Look, this means self-study, self-study. That is not reading. Is this behavior self-study? And what we just said about the determination, self-study, behavior self-study, determination is the reason for self-study. It is the instrumental reason. Why instrumental reason? that if he reads everything, he will change. It is not like that. Whatever changes will happen,

18:55 this will be the reason. I understand when it becomes a cause. It's when we internalize something from it. We throw out the old stuff. Okay? So that's a cause. Otherwise, it's not even a cause. Look, it's not a material. But Jinhvani isn't even a cause because the understanding within it remains the same. So is the benefit of practicing

19:41 Jinhvani merely increasing knowledge Knowledge is scriptural knowledge. What's in verse 40 and 41? All that is knowledge. Verbal knowledge, sensory knowledge, that is not about the soul. That knowledge doesn't know the soul. The one who doesn't know the soul is not knowledgeable.

20:31 Did you understand? That's called ignorance. What defines ignorance? Did you understand? Mistaking a tube light for a fan is not ignorance. Knowledge that only knows the other, even if it's Jynvani, doesn't Know the self. That knowledge is called ignorance. And that ignorance is the work of wandering. So its importance should not be felt by the living being. Are you understanding it or not? You just said.

21:24 You just. said this. Yes, the thing about the knowledge of scriptures which does not change. Yes, and through Jainvani, one forgives oneself. Yes, and that is the reason for wandering. Then, in that, also the scriptures will be called the cause. No, not in Brahman. Well, scriptures are not the cause. Not in Brahman. He did it through him. Still, that is not the cause. Yes, if it happened a little, then it will be considered the cause because you did not accept what the scriptures say. If you did not accept it, then it is the cause. If you

22:10 did not accept it, then you have taken your understanding from somewhere else. Whatever understanding you have got from some ignorant person, you have accepted it. That is the cause. Whether you have read the scriptures, yes, even if you have Read the scriptures, yes, that will not be called the cause. No, if there is no work, then there would be an allegation of the cause. What work has happened here? He wandered in the ethical work, the wandering that happened in the ethical work, in that whatever he has received after wandering, that is the cause, not the scriptures,

22:57 He interpreted the scriptures as per his wish. Yes, he did it as per his wish. So in that, the instrumentality of the ignorant person, yes, yes, or the knowledge of his ignorance, is the material. Knowledge is the material. It is the cause. If he has heard something from somewhere else, then... He is making a different kind of half formation. Like you are having the darshan of God. So God is in front of you and the feeling that you are having inside is the cause. It is equal, isn't

23:43 it? But at that time, you think of home and the eyes see God. So whatever sinful feeling you have, God is the cause in it. Isn't it... Sinful feeling is happening. You are thinking about money. Suppose it is a sinful thought of home or office. Then is the... Idol of God the cause in it? Is the... House the cause? Office is the cause. It is someone else's property. It is the cause. God is not real there. So God is not the cause even in auspicious thoughts. Oh, what should I

24:33 do? Do you understand that God is the cause only when pure thoughts are manifested? In auspicious thoughts, his aim is given like auspicious thoughts devotion comes. It is equal, but the realization that he is given He is giving the result of himself. He is giving the realization of purity and that. He says that I am looking at myself. Look in front of you. I am not looking at you. He is telling you by doing the actual experiment. He is giving the realization that look, I am sitting in meditation in my soul.

25:24 Are God's eyes slightly open below? Because he is in meditation, in self-meditation, and if you meditate on self, then he is the cause. If you meditate on Adra, then from where did he become the cause? There was a discussion about Raj Shrenak. In the Upasana, that Raj Shrenak had done with Yashodhar Muniraj. It was heard that Yashodhar Muniraj became the cause of seven hells for him. So the same thing had always happened. I asked the saint how he became the cause. And then through him, through the Muniraj of that time, he became the cause of

26:09 seven hells. He was... not the cause of seven hells. This thing became clear today. I said he is like a god in the guru. He became the cause of seven hells in this. Because of his ignorance? Ignorance is the substance. That ignorance due to the ignorant, yes. That ignorance of the guru of the bodhmat, yes, that is the cause. That is equally correct. Listen to me from you today. Shub is also the cause of circumambulation. For this he is not the cause. No, he does.

26:56 Not give the knowledge of Shub. And he does not do Shub either. He is introvert. He has the transformation of purity. Should. We do what he does only then. It is the cause. Such a contemplation Kharanika thing has come up in your book. This point, contemplation Kharanika thing, in the beginning. There is no cause in Dev Shastra Guru Shubh. In that, the cause is not the cause in Shud. In that, the cause is external, it is internal,

27:47 outside of an external factor. I don't have a question. See, in the world, there is a self-substance. All the rest are external substances. Right? One of them is external substances. If someone abuses you, and you get angry, then that abuse becomes the cause from the external substances. Okay. Because the causative act of anger happened here, in that, that abuse is the cause.

28:38 Okay. If you have forgiveness, then that is not the cause. If you become introverted, then that is not the cause. The feeling of forgiveness, the feeling of forgiveness is the origin of anger, so the husband who taught you the feeling of forgiveness, that is Devguru Shastra. He is also an external substance. And this is also an external substance. But whom you make the cause is in

29:27 your hands. If you get angry, et cetera, then this becomes the cause. This becomes the cause. And if you become introverted, then it becomes the cause. It means you yourself create the cause. There is no cause in the world. Everything is external property. It is finished. If you act according to it, then it is called and cause. It is not a permanent cause. Like you just gave the example of King Shrenak. What example did you give? You had... Given that King Shrenak sent a snake due to his cause and he was... Imprisoned in seven hills, so... He was not the

30:14 cause, Muniraj. right. For him it was external property. And when he had the right vision, then he became the cause. So he became the cause from external property. Look, if you want to make someone an instrument, then you will have to do your work. Then he will be the instrument. Such an instrument is not permanent. It is not the tricle instrument. Is it the instrument of all the three times? It is not like that. It is the external substance of all the three times. But according to that, whatever feeling you are doing under its influence, only then it gets the name of the instrument because the feeling

30:59 you are doing cannot make it happen. Many pandits interpret it wrongly. That he closed the seven hells for their sake, for their sake. Then he saw everyone, so you consider both of them like this. If you have just heard from you, then it is true, because whatever you yourself do, he has got that knowledge from somewhere or the other, due to some or the other reason. He has sanskars, it has been proved inside him, he had got it from those who were the gurus of Rajasik's knowledge. Yes, even if it is not there, then also, yes, yes, if there is no guru, then he has

31:47 brought his sanskars with him in the past, then he should be the medium through which the sanskars are imparted. In that question, the feeling of auspicious forgiveness, the feeling of forgiveness on the basis of God Gurushastra, means actually the best forgiveness, forgiveness with philosophy is a pure feeling, forgiveness is an auspicious feeling, as well as a pure feeling. The forgiveness that a knowledgeable person has is a pure feeling, And along with it, there is also an auspicious feeling. If he has optional forgiveness, then it is auspicious.

32:36 It can also happen to a great mumukshu. Yes, auspicious feeling. Auspicious feeling is not a pure feeling. And to give up the feelings of anger, etc. and to come to the feeling of forgiveness is the effort of the living being. It is the effort of the mumukshu. In whatever situation, if someone insults, abuses, makes fun of, then leaving aside the anger that is there in that type of situation, one should make an effort to have the feeling of forgiveness in that place.

33:26 It is a very excellent reason you can do it based on the principle that the person who is abusing me did. I abuse in the past, that is the result of the bondage of karma, now he is abusing me. Can a living being forgive even with such principle thinking? First thing, if I did not understand the party, I have seen failures many times,

34:14 then if there is negation, eh, if respect comes out, then it is just a simple, putani understanding, there is no insistence that Why do I understand if these respects do not come out? Then there is no negation. That is the reason. Understand that all my understanding

35:00 take all this. Do you have ignorance or not that there is knowledge you will get some knowledge by doing ignorance or you will get knowledge by leaving ignorance do you understand so if you consider that as ignorance then you will leave it right if you will stop it then you will leave it and your effort to attain right knowledge has started But if there is excess in knowledge, then how will you leave it?

35:52 Now the seed point is Madhyasta. Mediation is not about understanding, but about having a slight convergence of biases. Mediation means that you shouldn't insist that what you've understood to date is the truth. Because you're ignorant, you shouldn't insist that when something comes up and you feel that it's

36:40 better than what I understand, that it's more than what I understand, you immediately abandon it and accept it. Someone with prejudice can't do that. They can't let go of their own understanding. They listen, they understand, they even remember what was said. But they don't let go of the opposing opinion within themselves. They hold on to it. What? If something is impartial, they must consider

37:29 it impartially. Whatever comes up, they must first consider it neutrally. They must understand it. by abandoning their own understanding. And if it's true, they must immediately accept it and abandon their own understanding. Your understanding may be many years old, but its

38:14 insistence is that it is aside Be sure of the truth by applying the test of truth. Whatever comes up, it must either be true, whether you have a biased understanding, believe it or not. We have understood it this way, so will we not abandon this? I don't have such a biased understanding.

39:05 I don't believe in sectarianism. This is our sect of religion, whether Digambara or Shvetambara or any other religion. Brother, it is like this in our Digambara religion. This too will be a biased understanding, so abandon this too. We shouldn't have a sectarian understanding or a tradition-based understanding. This has been going on since our forefathers, so how will we abandon it now? This shouldn't happen either.

40:05 grandchildren of that tradition. First of all, be sure of this, saying this evidence, but the intention is not fixed. I give an example to explain that many people ask a question, but before that the answer is firmly established in their minds. Did you understand That means they are not curious, but he wants the other person to confirm the answer. Do you understand? He knows the answer is certain, but he

40:53 asks questions as if he doesn't know, because he wants the other person to confirm it. He asks questions, questions, yet he still doesn't want to confirm it. Look at the things he does. The other person thinks he's just curious, asking so many questions, asking questions isn't it.

41:42 We do the same in the world. We confirm what we've decided, then we discuss it. He decides. After deciding, he asks questions, and the other person thinks he hasn't decided. Understand? And then he keeps asking questions in a roundabout way until he says what he's confirmed.

42:28 And when he says, okay, okay, you say, if you don't get it, there must be a fuss. He doesn't stop. Oh, he doesn't stop. He twists and turns everything around and uses his own. You do this in the world, and it continues even after coming here. In this, for example, if you understand something and it's right or wrong, to confirm whether I should explain it right or wrong, how can you ask? That's not right either. That's not right either. I've understood it. Is it right

43:17 or wrong? Keep it that way and if you ask, you're empty inside and there's no room for you to accept it. So he escalates the discussion. If you ask him questions like, isn't He'll say, if it's not true, then how is it not true? I've heard it here, I've read it here. So that creates controversy and a lot of time. It's like I

44:05 don't know anything. He grasps whatever he understands directly, being zero, But for him, self-consciousness is a huge hindrance. Until self-consciousness diminishes, you can't become neutral. This is the problem. Because whatever a living being understands, he wants to tell it to others. He can't live without sharing it.

44:50 that mediation is not the right thing to do. If mediation isn't the right thing, he's not a good candidate for attaining the soul. Because of that, if all these thoughts are still within him, then he won't have equal vision. He's not holding on to his own opinion. Why are you holding on to your own opinion? What is that? I should remain a mediator, but I should remain neutral. I

45:41 shouldn't take sides with my understanding. I may have an understanding, I may even have a wrong understanding, but I shouldn't insist on someone else's side. If you're being misunderstood, you should immediately abandon it and accept the truth if you want to move forward. I have understood something through satsang. I have understood it from good people. And we are doing satsang with each other. I should have such determination in that, that I have heard this thing in satsang, and the other person is saying something slightly contrary to it. How to deal with that?

46:29 Keep in mind that the question is not for getting your point confirmed. The question is for you to understand as well. You should keep this in mind. I mean, you are understanding more than that. But that too is your ignorance. Isn't it right or not? Self-knowledge. Yes. Then you have not understood it in the way you should understand it. Although you have the same words, but there is a difference in the weight of each word. The weight of the word should be as much as it should be.

47:20 Although the words are the same, That is why one does not get self-knowledge by reading scriptures because the word does not come out, but it comes out in the words of a wise person. See the difference from here because it is just a word. From where will the bhajan come in it? In a sentence, where is the speaker? Emphasizing, where is its weight? that cannot be easily grasped from the scriptures.

48:08 In the scriptures, it is the words of the wise, yes, but in the words of the wise, one should study the scriptures with the knowledge of the scriptures. That is a different matter, but in that too, if they have to do it with the knowledge of the guru, than if they do it with the knowledge of the guru, then the guru will also give those words where he has given them, yes, give them their. Do you understand it or not? They too must have given the truth in it. Whatever the acharyas have given, they have also given the truth to them equally. Then if the guru understands it less, then it will not become special. It will come to you equally in weight, equal, weight is different? Gurudev, when Kundkundacharya talks about God,

48:57 then where does the weight come in his words? In which words? How much fearlessness is there? How will you grasp that the detachment is visible even more in the scriptures? It is visible even more than in the scriptures. No, Where will the detachment be visible in the scriptures? There is a little surprise in every sentence that I am fearless. I am fearless. He will not say like this. Even Gurudev will not say that I am detached. But you will get this tone in his speech. Detachment. And that is what impacts him. Confidence.

49:45 means confidence, certainty, the confidence that is generated from confidence certainty. That it is so, it is not the other way around. If someone is speaking the truth, then detachment is visible in him, or not whoever says it, you feel that he is the truth. Neither is he a liar, he makes mistakes here and there, but he too has become an expert. Nowadays, even lies are spoken as if they are true. Still, there is a difference in them. The one who can catch the

50:30 detachment can catch it. Just now there was a discussion that some of my past deeds will emerge this shaped me. In that, It is not because of satsang. It is the emergence of my past feeling. I did it. It has happened. It has had an impact on me. Yes, it has had an impact. See, that is what I want to say. Your earlier understanding was that the preeminence will emerge. There is no doubt about it. Yes, I must have done something. Yes. Then deep inside, I might not have done it. All this happens. All this happened. Yes. See, this difference, this is the difference. The thought came from. And that did not happen. It had such a huge

51:18 impact. Yes, it must have, Gurudev. People speak so loudly in public. Their words immediately impact the person in front. This is a matter of direct experience. Yes, otherwise I am saying that whoever listens to Gurudev do not bring the biggest life. The biggest thing is so much detachment in the words that it has a huge impact on the listener. I also became so awakened that now I will remain so aware that even words will never come. I became

52:07 so convinced and that detachment that has come to you. Detachment comes only because of detachment. Transformation comes only through transformation. See, this is the principle. And I found a way to maintain equanimity in my mind. I felt this way from within. And as a result, your future results will change significantly. You will see and you will find out. Because the emergence of past karma will continue. It won't stop. But your certainty that it is your own doing will reduce your love and hatred for the

52:55 other person. It won't come immediately. It won't come as before a soul. It will come, but it becomes very slow. There is. was a lot of certainty about the wire. This is the exact difference. That is to say, it is not coming from reading Genvani. That is what we are saying. Why is there all this principle of attaining teachings? No one has done this for

53:45 subjugation. Only he should understand. Hey friend, the soul has infinite power. It can accomplish its work of knowledge only through its own efforts. So does it need a wise person for attaining true knowledge? The idea of a wise man finding strength in his lotus feet, what is all this, does not make sense to me. What happened to the power of the soul happens a lot to people who study scriptures how is this possible this is subjugation but their transformation is taking place from transformation they do not understand this

54:33 self-knowledge does not happen through this this should happen to those with 11 limbs right this was not said by kripalu dev no That is why they do not follow it, they do not read it anywhere. What is it that Gurudev Sri finds Acharya Bhagwan's words very healing? So what is this? Is it a PhD or is it above double graduation in college? So what do you have to do on the first day, how to sit? All this will not come up in the satsang there, the one. who is sitting in the final year to attain self-knowledge, he will attain self-knowledge in the next minute. That words are right for such

55:21 a being. So it is said that Gurudev has not said all these things, but in the discourse of Atmasiddhi Shastra, you will be interested to know that Gurudev has said more than Krippanu Dev. Tell me, if you want to see, then see. Today only, we were watching the second page of Atmasiddhi Shastra, Gurudev's discourse, in that Gurudev said, Guru Govind, both are standing. This Gurudev takes a different opinion. Does it apply to whom? The Almighty God is standing and the Guru is standing.

56:10 Here, both are standing together. Okay. Now whom should I salute first? I will not insult the Almighty God. You say this, but it is not in your heart. You are saying this just for the sake of saying. I bow to Gurudev who told me about Govind, who is God. Tell me about Guru, Gurudev says that one should first salute the Guru and this is what Kripanudev has said in the letter.

57:02 Has he not said this? Has he said that if there is a visible Guru and there is an indirect idol of Lord Mahavir, then one should salute them? Has he said it only till that extent? Or if both are present then whom should one salute? Has Gurudev taken this? This Gurudev went overboard. There Kripalu has been the mediator. You see, if you want to see, then check it. Page number two, Discourse of Atma Siddhi Shastra Gurudev Sri. Tell me, Gurudev who talks about determination, who talks about record pull, and who says that Devgurushastra has material has said this.

57:51 You will not understand. Is this Gurudev or has any other mistake been printed? Everyone should read the discourse of Atmasiddhisastra. Gurudev's is very good. Gurudev says the same thing. that Kripalu Dev says. You might think there's no difference. But if you sit with the Samayasar and hear with a letter from Kripalu Dev, there's a stark difference. This point is also raised in the Daval Granth, which you're saying now, in the Panch Parmeshti, which states that the Siddhas are great, that the Arhats have just destroyed their four

58:36 sinful karmas. Why did we salute them first? Then, namo arihatan, why first? Why not? Namosinam, why not first? That principle emerges from the Lord's words. I understand the question. Who is the highest? Who is? Namo ariton, namo sin, then namo ariton, right? Why is this so? Because namo should sit within you. Why doesn't it sit? You understand, right? And this mantra, it wasn't created by anyone. It's eternal and infinite. It's natural. And in it, we

59:27 first took namo. Nature is also saying that whatever is beneficial and helpful to you is number one for you. Nature is telling you this. But the soul then calculates after reading it, which gunistan is better? He has 13 and the Siddha Bhagwan has 14 after him, so he is number one. That calculation doesn't work here. And the Guru is in the fourth gunistan, so how will the calculation come about? Then in the fourth Gunistan, in the midst of the worldly life, Madhar Uba saw

1:00:14 that he had no touch of the material world. All these people sing devotion, but nothing can happen inside. Arendt also has knowledge in the world right now. He is not worldly and not liberated, but still, I want to say that he was given first place. The Gnani has direct knowledge, so he was glorified along with all the gods. Kripalu Dev gave this much importance there, and Guru Dev did even more than that.

1:01:03 Because of Guru Dev, the first Guru, for me, Guru Dev is greater than Anantir Tankara. So Gurudev is in the fourth Gunistan and Kripalu Dev said in the 11th Self-Realization, look, there is no indirect favor like the direct Sadhguru. There is no direct Sadhguru. The rest of the religions are indirect. If you do not understand them, then if you are not sure about them, then no thoughts will arise in your soul.

1:02:00 Do some self-study of the 11th verse. You should not just listen to everything. Thank you.

1:02:49 Okay. No. Now the topic just came up. That if I am a woman in this state, then I cannot change anything in it. Like, if I am a woman in this state, then I cannot change anything. If I am a woman, then I cannot change. If I am a woman... Then, this change was not there. If you were not a man. If you were not a... Man? Then it still remains? Inside me, that I am not able to get the required yoga of Sri Guru. So I had tied such an

1:03:35 internal fear in my heart. So what efforts should I make now? that I get such company in the future forever. You should have simplicity in the future, leave deception in the present, stop hiding. Then if you get the life of a man, then this problem will not arise, neither if you are a woman. You can have intercourse, that is your question if you are a man, then you can do it. that even he cannot do it. Can a man do it or not if a

1:04:22 man has done deception in his previous life, then as a result of that he had to come in the female form. Okay, then you should leave it now. You should leave deception. The basic reason is deception. Thank you sir, if someone falls into the trap, he becomes ignorant again like before. Read Jino Sam Darshan, if he was ignorant first, yes, 100% ignorant, like 100%, there is no difference, it does not fall like this stepwise, it does not fall stepwise. If he becomes knowledgeable, if he was ignorant after that, then gradually he goes down step by step and falls

1:05:11 all at once. If he is in the first standard, he directly comes to the fourth standard by attaining self-knowledge. That too does not climb step by step. Even when he climbs, he does not take a step but jumps. In the fourth, and even when he falls, he jumps in the first. Three or two passes in seconds. Like if you fall, then that step will come in between. But if you fall down, then it comes in between for a second. Now you do not fall there, you fall straight down, but that creature can get self-knowledge in future. Even if the person who falls has Samyak Darshan once and falls, then his salvation is certain in the period

1:06:01 of Ardha Pudga Parivartan. But that is a very long period. But it is not infinite for him. It is the period of Ardha-Pudgalparivartan. From the follow-on question, you know that there was some Samyak Darshan, for example. Understand that someone had Samyak Darshan and then he fell. After that, in a little bit of life, whoever, after that, in the follow-on life, if they know somewhere that they had equal vision before, if they go and ask Keva the Bhagwan, He will tell them that Kepati Bhagwan will not tell them that he will forget that and he will not remember that, he will not become like that, so can there be any such creature here? Here the ignorant

1:06:52 person who considers himself knowledgeable. Hupatum. What does that ignorant person think of himself? He thinks that he has forgotten. He has forgotten. Forgotten. He has fallen. If he has fallen, then he is ignorant. Then why do you consider him knowledgeable? Because he is sure that his equal vision will definitely come back. When will it come? After quarters of years. Then he will roam around in between. He will roam. Not with him. But he will be included. Not inclination. Totally also negative. Well, yes, you can go to any accident. Whatever any ignorant person does, he will do the same. That is an external factor. So there is belief in me. The belief

1:07:40 is gone. If self-knowledge is gone, then the belief is gone. It is the belief of self-knowledge only. Where is it? Said in Prakash. Accepting falsehood is also false kudev will go to Kuru. He can do that too. He is... Such a creature that I know right now. I will know that... I only know what Amritchandracharya Bhagwan says. I know that, Jai Ho! Amritchandracharya Bhagwan in the 38th verse of Samayasar and the 92nd verse of Pravachansar. It is said that once a creature has Samyak Darshan, he will not fall.

1:08:29 I only know that, if a person of Panchmara has Samyak Darshan once, he will not fall. If one person falls among crores, then who will think about him? Because in such a bad time, where even finding a mumukshu is difficult, in such a time, those who have done the work by making utmost efforts, their level is different. They will not fall, they will only make a name for themselves. He is saying with great confidence you took the opportunity, even the sprout will not be born. So you fool, you fool, 38.

1:09:21 Fools. This was the guru explaining. The matter of knowledge is self-knowledge. So come to the world now, no one can tempt you. uprooted the matter from its roots and attachment threw it away. And from one perspective, their philosophy is similar, but it has a sound like a kshayak, destructive, just like the one who uproots the root, the one who decays. But it will happen to him, it will happen in the future, emerging from it, and that too, through Agamkoshalya. The one who is proficient in the

1:10:09 scriptures has no problem, he is powerful. His very essence is his foundation, the entire Genvani. His entire foundation is... Agamkoshalya. And the second word, add... Two words to Agamkoshalya, Agamkoshalya, and from your experience... Something will have to be looked into. I don't remember the whole thing, it's a question. Of many... blinds. Jaijin Endrakhoi. The narrow mind is so strong in some matters that it is difficult to know whether the thing that comes to mind

1:10:55 is actually beneficial or not. How do I assess whether something is for my benefit or not? How to understand this? If a matter comes up and you have one understanding but a different thing is coming up, okay? Then you should be curious and ask specific questions. And one should grasp the truth. One should pursue it until one understands it. One should inquire. One should think again and again, ask questions and be certain. After this process,

1:11:42 when one is certain, then abandon one's understanding and embrace it. Manifesting mumuksha, free will, and manifesting the four qualities all involve karma, meaning how to manifest mumuksha. Manifesting these four qualities involves karma, meaning how to manifest mumuksha, free will. What does it mean to adopt a goal?

1:12:34 I will not give importance to the rest of my life in this world. I will accept it as it is. But I will complete this task. When one makes such a decision, liberation arises within him. Then, through effort, one can manifest simplicity, mediation, and a broad intellect. There is no problem. Or, If someone has not yet manifested mumuksha, then if they try to cultivate this broad intellect, simplicity, etc., their interest in it diminishes over time. When

1:13:22 falsehood diminishes, he also attains the goal of perfection. All this is interconnected. Not just an The online, audio connection, the

1:14:09 of excellent devotion. Arise from the request to receive light from the devotion of God. Whoever does devotion should become a man. Visit your temple. Consider God your own respect, honor, and devotion. The maximum devotion is only towards you.

1:15:01 If you consider God, guru, scriptures, and wise men as 254 letters, then if you consider excellent devotion towards God, then devotion is above all else. Victory to the most revered, supremely virtuous Sri Sadhgurudev. Victory to the idol of revered Bhagwati. Victory to Revered Sri Kripa Dev, victory to... Revered Sri Shashi Prabhu. Victory to the Three Times Five Supreme Beings.

1:15:53 Victory to the Eternal Digambar Jain Religion. Victory to the Mother of Jynvani. Victory to all the wise and righteous people in the Three Worlds and Three Times. No sound can be heard below.