Brief Summary
The content creator discusses the decision to stop live streaming on YouTube and focus on Twitch due to several factors. YouTube's algorithm doesn't effectively promote live streams, resulting in limited growth compared to Twitch. Additionally, Twitch offers better ad revenue, superior user interaction features like raids, and more flexibility with copyrighted music. The creator also addresses concerns about Twitch being "evil" and clarifies that the move is based on practical benefits for content creation and revenue generation. Despite stopping live streams, the creator plans to continue posting shorter content on YouTube to maintain a presence and reach a wider audience.
- YouTube's algorithm doesn't effectively promote live streams.
- Twitch offers better ad revenue and user interaction features.
- The creator will continue posting shorter content on YouTube.
Introduction
The content creator acknowledges that the decision to stop live streaming on YouTube will not please everyone. She mentions that she has been streaming on YouTube for the past two years, starting before she used Twitch. Despite the initial support on YouTube, she has found it difficult to grow her audience and justify continuing live streams on the platform.
Reasons for Switching to Twitch
The content creator explains that Twitch has provided more growth and support compared to YouTube. She highlights several advantages of Twitch, including better ad revenue, superior user interaction features like raids, and the ability to use copyrighted music to a degree. The raid system on YouTube is described as "abysmal" and ineffective for making connections with other streamers. Twitch's ad revenue is significantly higher, making it a more viable platform for generating income.
YouTube's Shortcomings
The content creator expresses frustration with YouTube's lack of support for streamers. She points out that YouTube's algorithm doesn't promote live streams effectively, and the platform's DMCA policies can be problematic. Anyone can claim ownership of a sound clip in a VOD, leading to revenue sharing disputes. Additionally, YouTube's AI bots can demonetize channels for seemingly innocuous content, such as wholesome ASMR affirmations.
Addressing Concerns and Misconceptions
The content creator addresses concerns about viewers not being able to pay to watch streams. She clarifies that she is not requiring viewers to pay and that VODs will be available on Twitch for two months. This allows viewers to catch up on streams at their convenience. She also responds to criticisms about Twitch being "evil," stating that it provides more benefits for streamers in terms of revenue and audience engagement.
Future Content on YouTube
The content creator emphasizes that she will continue posting content on YouTube, including six-minute clips and highlights from VODs. The goal is to maintain a presence on the platform and reach a wider audience through shorter, more engaging content. She hopes that YouTube will eventually promote her content more effectively, but for now, she will focus on Twitch for live streaming.
Final Thoughts and Community Engagement
The content creator reiterates the reasons for switching to Twitch, including better ad revenue, improved user interaction, and the ability to use copyrighted music. She acknowledges the negative comments and complaints from YouTube viewers but stands by her decision, as Twitch provides more benefits for her as a streamer. She concludes by acknowledging a positive comment from a community member, highlighting the importance of community engagement.
