0:12 Well, folks, it is simply proposed and exposed that this is all there is to it. This is all there is to it. The utter abundant simplicity of what's naturally appearing to happen. And it's a it's a very simple and it's simple in its exposure and yet somehow or other it seems to be energetically dynamic. There's a dynamism of the utter simplicity and ordinariness. Um so I like to play with oxymorons for some reason or other. It kind of it kind of uh blows to smitherines any attempt to actually turn this into a thing or
0:58 understand something or make a process or a path. Even some kind of development of understanding something. It is kind of shocked to smitherines when it's when it's exposed that this what is everything. This what this what is total. It is neither real nor unreal. It's not actually a thing. It's not an object to be known or labeled. So therefore, it can't really legitimately be called real or unreal because it's not an it. There's no it to point at and say this is what it is. Um and somehow or other there's just the the outpouring of words and the outpouring of sitting
1:44 and the outpouring of listening and the outpouring of whatever appears to be. But there is no real separate distant thing to be knowing, labeling or defining this. This is absolute. Absolute meaning not relative. Although the relative is the absolute, but we'll get to that later. The absolute is actually naturally all there is. And that's unknowable. It's unrelatable. It's absolutely immediate. It's completely this, dynamically this. Whatever appears is that. There's nothing to figure out with that. There's nothing to to progress with that. Immediacy is timeless and distanceless.
2:31 So that can't be gotten. It can't be [clears throat] practiced, can't be navigated. It's completely unnavigable 100%. And that is divine despair. really the divine despair that that doesn't leave an inch of hope for a next for a next moment. What's next? What's going to happen? There's no anticipating immediacy. You can't expect immediacy to happen or show up when it's already. So the word already often happens in in these gatherings because it just is too
3:16 immediate again. There's no there's no hope in what is already. It's so readiness is total despair. There's nothing to to wait for. And it's divine disorientation because there's no position to take a stand within this. There's no location or orientation to be here separate from what's appearing to happen. And what's appearing to happen again is is not on show. It's it's not presented to someone or something really. Nothing is presented, nothing is
4:04 showing up objectively to be known, to be related to, to be owned even. And so it's it's dynamically unknowable. Media is unknowable. And without I mean without any more stories to tell after that, that that's all there is to it. It's it's just naturally abundantly freshly and freely whatever appears to be happening whether it appears to be good or bad positive or negative. It's not really polarized. Not without the story to distinguish and discern without the stories to distinguish and discern. It's unconditionally
4:50 and equinimously neutral. So that that includes all it doesn't confine to this and not that that is this too. But of course in the stories and the most popular story of all would be that which seems to be localized, identified, separate and distant. An elusory perception which feels itself to be energetically [clears throat] viscerally charged with solidity, substance and realness.
5:36 And it's like a vortex in a way. It's an illusion that the entire appearance made of nothing, nothing actually there, no substance there, but the entire appearance could seem to swirl up into a vortex of localization, a bit like a a whirlpool or something. And in that whirlpooly sort of energy which is completely nothing at all, no substance there, not even a real happening. It's but it just seems so viscerally charged. And I like this gesture seems to like happening at the moment because it's
6:21 kind of like it feels like it's going round and around and around a bit like a tornado and it seems to suck things in like object the the objectified world is being sucked in and stories and thoughts and identifications are getting sucked in and it seems so really personal like it all revolves around someone. I'm gravitating towards this and I'm repulsed by that. I seek for this and I resist that. I'm a world I'm a world to myself of discernment and comparing and separating and abstracting and that there's there's no one at the center of that bubble really.
7:08 That center is not actually there. It's it's an illusion, a mirage that feels like it's point. It's pointed local, totally identified and separate and substantial. And what seems to be apparent in that is that the story is not actually really growing out of that vortex. It is the vortex, the vortex of continuity that there is actual happenings unfolding in timeline and I'm watching them happen before me. And I am not the storyteller. I am the
7:54 storytelling. The story is not separate from the dream of I am. It is the whole I am bubble, the old artificial reality of there being a separate thing called me. That that is the storytelling. There's no such thing as a storyteller. There's no subject on any level. So the the subject is in it lives in the story really. And it's impossible to to really accurately describe all of that because abstraction is in that dream. And so when when there's talking about that or talking around that the talking is talking in abstractional terms, it's
8:42 saying that there's a story happening, there's contraction happening, there's a sense of location. And that's all saying suggesting that there are different things called location, continuity, storytelling, autonomy, meaning and purpose, etc. But that is all in the world of there actually being separation at all. And so even the talking about it is kind of validating too much almost the the illusory nature as something actually happening. But it's not as something actually happening. It's the illusion of happenings. It's an illusion of happenings. Yeah. And so it can't it can't conceive of its
9:27 own. It can't conceive how illusory it is because it's not really there to actually see itself as such and it can't step out of itself. Obviously, that that doesn't really compute or make any sense. And there's again there's nothing actually there to to really dismantle. But what is energetically apparent and exposed dynamically so is that there there is there's no substance to a dream of realness [laughter] complete upside down inside out and back to front oxymoronic illusion that there's no substance to the dream of substantiality. There's no realness to the dream of what
10:15 seems so desperately real. And there's also no problem either. And that's one thing that it doesn't really seem to very much like hearing. Um so perhaps I should sh say it again. It's not a problem. Yeah, there's no problem to be solved. There is no solution and there there really isn't actually a problem. The whirlwind seems to have a felt sense of going round cyclically. The storytelling seems so viscerally charged in a way. It is one with the vortex of nothingness seeming to cycle and circle around.
11:01 And in that is a is such a conviction of continuity being real and it's it seems to have a kind of problem-solving energy that that kind of really seems to develop in there like there are hurdles to get past continuity. I get I get there I go there I achieve this I improve that and yes it's seeing a world of continuity so it's seeing a world of happenings of things changing and and in that there can be a real sort of agitation or the app it seems like there's an agitation happening and again
11:46 it's just it's it's looking for something to change in a way. It's it's dependent on this sense of something is going to be better or something's going to get better or this is going to be better or I'm going to get better. And it's like anticipating something happening. Something is going to happen. But that cyclic energy is not going anywhere at all. the cyclic continuous sort of wheel it is not going anywhere at all and it's anticipating what's going to happen but that just it just doesn't get anywhere which is why you know I would strongly suggest that the wheel of samsara in the
12:33 Buddhist tradition is is is not a teaching it's actually a very very potent metaphor in a if there ever was one for this illusion of separation of continuity of going and coming and becoming because that's [clears throat] what it is. It's called the wheel of life for a reason because it just goes round and round and round. But the wheel is not attached to anything else. So it's just an illusion. It's not going it really isn't going anywhere. It just feels like it is because it can't the hamster it can't step off and and go or change. Of course, when it talks about the spiral path, then it becomes something
13:20 progression based like there we could, you know, move and ascend up and get higher or get, you know, to to more transcendence or reveal more reality or whatnot. And that's yeah there there's no realness to the to that. And so what is what is dynamically exposed is that that wheel is not going coming or becoming anything. It's just nothing seeming to be something really convincing me. And yet there's nothing even in there to be convinced. The apparent subsidance of all of that
14:07 is a is a totally dynamic impersonal revelation that it's not even happening. That it's not even a happening to stop happening. The revelation that that cycle is not really there. There's no substance to that. And the falling away of that is the falling away of continuity and change itself in a in a continuous way. Well, then that's not that's not going to happen. That's not going to be what will happen. That is this already. That's this already without the waiting for it. It's it's this already without the tail chasing energy of thinking that's going to be what's next. So an
14:52 anticipated what's next is just it's either it's it's either this seeming to anticipate or it isn't really because the tail is the imagined what's next and the mouth running after it is you know that's the anticipation in a way but the there's no it it never gets it never catches it just apparently stops running after the tail Well, then that's not that's not some kind of it's obviously not some kind of acquisition. It's not an obtainment. It's not an accomplishment, an achievement. It's just this. It's just the total appearance which was
15:38 never apart, never separate, never split, never polarized, never anything other than naturally this what's appearing to happen. too simple for all of that cyclic cognitive dreamwork abstraction. Going round and around in concepts, getting lost in trying to understand something or to change something, to fix something, to cure this, to heal that, to remedy. There's nothing broken. There's nothing wrong. There's nothing other than this what is
16:24 naturally appearing panel. So nana is already essentially nana is already readiness. Sam samsara is the dream of what's next. It's the dream of now and then. an illusory polarity of now and then. And it imagines that nana is what's next. But nana is not what's next. Is this already?
17:43 We can have a chat and flame in the language of it. Can this tornado of energy carry on after the death of the body? So after is the tornado. After is in the reality of the tornado, the tornado of me. It lives and and as a reality of continuity before and after now and then. Damn it. [laughter] Yeah. Yeah. Damn it. Indeed. Again, divine despair. Without this elusory vortexes, there's no next. There really
18:29 is nothing to anticipate. Yeah. And it's like it's imagining that the tornado is actually circulating around a thing called a body. But that too is an illusion that there's such a thing as a separate body. that contracted energy to use that term could circulate or or fixate onto and I know we have to you know use words to some extent to to talk around this um but actually the whole illusion is of things happening and that includes the thing called body
19:17 but without illusion and abstraction there's no such thing as a body which contracted energy is actually latching onto. So contracted energy does not belong to a human body and not vice versa either. So the the the the death of a body is just the death of a body. It's there's no there isn't actually separate things to live or die. This totality is unabractable. It's not made of separate pieces, separate things. It's atomically and vibrantly and dynamically
20:02 empty. Nothing but um the good sorry the contracted energy if the body's there's no body then it's like there's no body to there's no separate be sep sense of separation to feel the contracted energy once the body is dissolved into the Earth, you know, once the body's this, you know, is not animated any longer with >> Yeah. >> whatever this is. >> Yeah. The the body isn't actually a sentient creature that is aware. >> Yeah. Already. Even if it seems like
20:49 there is someone, that's not the body that is aware. That's not the body. It is actually someone. >> Yeah. The body doesn't actually know. Yeah. So, if there's contracted energy when the body's dropped or the body's gone, there's no one to feel the contracted energy. It's just energy. Like everything, it's just energy. There's no one to feel it. >> Yes. But but there's no one to feel the contracted energy. Even if a body seems to be >> I know that's the tr Yeah. Yeah. So, >> even if it seems like there's a center, no one's aware that there's a set. No, there isn't actually anyone that is actually aware of a center. >> Yeah. Yeah. So, no one feels contracted energy because contracted energy is not is not objectifiable. It's an illusion.
21:35 Yeah. >> Yeah. It's very strong, very potent illusion that there's someone here feeling all this in that vortex. >> We could we could say it is the very illusion of potency itself. Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> And yet it's yet it can't actually be found. It's great. You know, when we close our eyes or when I when I close my eyes, it's such a it's like it's, you know, it's just there's nothing there. It's just sensation and vibration. >> Yeah. And that's all there is. Yeah. Unlocated. Unlocated and unabracted. Yeah. And there's nothing to change or fix.
22:22 >> And it's like, have you seen that film Gravity? I don't know if you ever saw gravity with 4D glasses, but it's >> like falling through space. Um, I mean, it's very delicious that whole just the sensation of just this >> without an edge. Yeah. And at the same time, what happens here for me is like it's almost like, well, it isn't almost like, but it's the hardest thing on the planet in existence for the me sometimes just to be with this, you
23:08 know? It's like it's so visceral. It's so wild. >> It's [clears throat] almost like it's trying to squeeze itself through a very small space. >> Yeah. because it needs it it is a dream of storytelling and and contextualization. And I say I know storytelling the word storytelling and contextualization may seem like cognitive appearances. They're not. It's energetically storytelling and and contextualization energy >> which makes the tiny space that the energy >> it gives an illusion of orientation. Yeah. like I'm I'm wedged in between the past and the future and I'm contextualized by the past and the future by living in the now. So
23:53 everything is therefore >> I live as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle. >> Yeah. But what I'm saying is is the actual I mean I'm going to use the actual experience because it feels like experience on a visceral level is of like a dam try you know like a huge energy trying to get through a tiny space in this I mean like I'm just going to use words and images in this same in this body it's almost like a a huge waterfall of energy trying >> that's what it feels like it's so uncomfortable and yet it's not because then it's just energy. Do you know what I mean? But to the me having a moan about it, >> it feels really uncomfortable and the last thing I want to be doing, but
24:38 there's no choice, you know? It's like that's all there is. >> And it's almost like it it it makes me sweat with sometimes, you know, it's just like all you can do is breathe. Um anyway, that's story. I would strongly suggest that it's so uncomfortable because it's contextualizing that that that it's wrong and that there's something that is right and what's wrong is now. >> Exactly. And that it's almost like the image. >> Yeah. >> The image of this of this conriction. You're right. The is Yeah. [laughter] >> I'm going to shut up. >> Yeah. The image of this constriction or the feeling of that is the
25:24 contextualization of what you're saying. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Is it? Have I am I not listening? >> Because it's resistant to what is and seeking for something else. And there's nothing else to actually seek for. It can't accept and let go to the natural reality of what is already dynamically timelessly this. Even the pain which it claims to own and know and push away is totally this. That's totally unconditionally lovingly this. Yeah. If it accepted if I mean it can't accept it just can't accept that. But if it did it's over. It's done. >> Yeah. >> Because what what reality is there to the dream of continuity? I mean it's
26:10 absolutely unreal. It's th this claim is so seemingly strong and yet there's no continuity. There's never been a moment ago or a moment from now. It it's there's no charge to that. Yeah. So it seems to feel like it's it's still here. It's still here. It's been here for God knows how long and and it's always been here and it and it won't go away. And that whole storytelling is is totally synonymous with the illusion of continuity. They are not separate. It's not separate from the anticipatory role of what's next and what will be. And that's just completely illusory. That's
26:56 already timelessly what's appearing to appear. And so that's too wide open for for any kind of acknowledgement. It's too wide open for for the seeing of that. It's just too already. Yeah. Too too wide open. Too immediate. Too already, you know, wide open already. immediate are it's all that's all divine disorientation the way I'm saying it because it it's contextualized in relation to what's next if this is already home if this is already the absolute that there's no orientation in that if this is totally blasted wide
27:43 open to the farthest imaginable you know depth and breadth of a universe without an edge or a bord border or a boundary There's no orientation in that cuz orientation needs, you know, a constriction. It needs like a here. And if it's too immediate to too immediately this, there's no timeline to refer to a then even a moment from now. So there's no relative contextualizing now and then immediiacy blowing the doors open of the illusion of continuity. So every orientation and position contextualized is blown to smitherines.
28:28 It's over. It's already over. It never wasn't over. It's timelessly this. Any vibrational sensation is a quantumously this. There's no there's no hurdles to get through or past. It's totally totally already this. Thanks Lexi.
29:18 Why do some people talk about past lives so convincingly? They claim these experiences to be very real. What is all that? It would seem to be coming from an interpretation of a reality which is continuous. Yeah. Like it's seeing this world as something happening in a continuous manner. And so if it's having if if there are what appears to be memories which are objectified therefore known owned and related to then it's seeing those as a recording of a past event as something distant from now which happened and then it puts itself in there. It says I was there. I'm not I'm not there now but I was
30:05 there then. It's like the it it puts a fictional character into that context and says I was there and I'm here now and that's proof of my reality as a separate self moving through timeline. It's distorting the whole reality basically because there's nothing actually there to be having a present life let alone a past one that there's no one incarnated to be reincarnated. All of that swirling vortex revolves around nothing and no one. There's no one there. There really is no one at the center of any of this. And I know that that seems to be scary for an organism to an apparent organism to hear that um
30:50 when it seems as though the organism is confused um to be a separate thing. Um but actually it's complete liberation from all of these notions of continuity because the thing about continuity is it's a it's institutionalized. It deeply feels like a source of safety and yet it's terrifying. I mean you think about going round and round on the samsaric cosmic treadmill for eons. No one wants that. >> [laughter] >> No one wants to go round and round for for millennia, you know, living the the same old habitual patterns uh physically mentally emotionally and energetically over and over again. And
31:36 yet, it's terrified of the absence of what's next because that's annihilation, of separation. I live in relation to what will be and so I'm dependent on that and yet I'm sick of it. [laughter] Yeah. But um you know there there is essentially no one to be reborn or redying. Um yeah, it doesn't revolve around anyone. And if the memories appear to have a solid accuracy to them, just like the the little boys um in Tibet and Nepal who are picked carefully and they do all those tests and they like have impeccable, you know, accurate uh recollections of of a previous llama
32:21 or rimpo. Um that doesn't belong to them. [snorts] It doesn't belong to them. They're re they're apparently recalling events that happened to someone else and and now they're claimed as belonging to someone and that gives this illusion of a thread a thread that actually revolves around something. None of it revolves around anything or anyone. It's emptiness. It's shy. Just in the same way you could have a thought like there could be a thought arising about someone and then the next second they're calling you on the phone. It doesn't actually belong to anyone. [snorts] How are those recollections possible? Everything and anything is possible and
33:07 yet all there is is nothing apparently happening. It's it's it's impossible and yet it's possible. It's chaos. It's chaos appearing to be ordered. Appearing to be ordered. I mean, I would I would strongly suggest that everyone on this meeting it has had apparently had moments of, you know, clairvoyance or or serendipity, um, synchronicity, as you might call it. Moments where it doesn't really make sense. It doesn't add up how I had that thought and then it happened. I had a thought about someone and then I saw them seconds later. you know, it it happens all the time. There's no meaning
33:55 to any of it. It's just chaos. Yeah. It's just chaos. The the dream contextualizes all of it and then turns it into a narrative, into a fairy tale, and then it then it maybe projects, you know, like um individuality onto the the entire appearance and says, "Oh, it's because of that guy up there in the clouds. That's that's what's going on. He's he's overseeing this and pushing the buttons and giving us clues, enigmatic clues into the nature of existence and reality. And then it all seems like densely affirmed as uh something meaningful. Well, you know, not only does it not mean anything, it doesn't need to mean
34:41 anything. This is just Leela, the divine cosmic play abundantly out of anyone and anything's control. And it doesn't need to go anywhere or become anything because it's nothing at all. Yeah. It's just playfully, energetically what's appearing to happen.
35:34 So you can imagine how humiliating it is, how divinely, wondrously and liberatingly humiliating it is for the revelation to really set in that I don't even have a present life, let alone a past life. And all of those memories that seem to appear, they're not mine. There's no mind to which they could belong. And that I never knew anything because there is no I to know anything. I never had any relatives. I never had any objects that I related to or owned.
36:21 And I never did anything. I never even lifted a finger because that eye was never there. And that is the total humiliation which is complete liberation which is already liberation not on offer. It's this
37:47 And it's like, you know, I've never had a problem. Not a problem, but it's been really easy to feel how breath doesn't belong to me. >> Oh, yeah. >> It's just we're being breathed. And actually, that's what's happening with absolutely everything. No, >> that it's it's the longing or the loss that I feel when someone dies or you know the anything that we feel >> or I feel. >> Yeah. >> It's just it's just like that breath. It's just this huge infinite I mean can't use the word you know just this huge happening of >> sensation and vibration emotion but it
38:33 doesn't belong to me it's not mine it's not >> I know you've said and I I know that you've said this to to this here a a few times because I've said oh why do I feel so sad or why does that person you know that person bring about this feeling in me when there's no separation but it's all completely irrelevant somehow it's all it's just feeling >> wonderfully so yeah wonderfully irrelevant >> yeah yeah yeah I don't mean irre matters and it's all blah it's like wow it's all irrelevant and it you know
39:23 It's almost like the big It all just was a big baron and it is always just a big baron. >> The timeless explosion of this. Yeah. >> Yeah. You know, to say my breath would belong to me is [clears throat] a bit like saying all of the dust and debris belongs to the center of a tornado. There's nothing there. There's nothing actually in there that is owning that. There isn't anything in there to own that. It's like it's it's like a silhouette or something. It's like an outline. You imagine, you imagine in the cartoons when the, you know, Bugs Bunny
40:09 or something runs through one runs through a wall and then the wall has got like a Bug's Bunny outline shape. [laughter] It's like and then you think that that's a bunny. It's not a bunny. It's an outline of a bunny. You know what I mean? It's like that there isn't actually anything there. It's it's an it's a contextualized nothingness, but it seems to be contextually something because it seems like there's something around that. You know what I mean? It's like there isn't actually anything at the center to claim what's happening. Um, yeah. So, it's it's like it's a I mean, it's an impeccable impeccable mirage.
40:57 so curious. And yet there's because there's nothing in the center, there's nothing to be convinced that that's true or false, that it's real or unreal or that it's illusory, that it's artificial or natural. There's nothing there to be convinced of that. There's nothing there to to relinquish that, to hold on to that. There's nothing to own any of that. And even as the the like that could actually disappear, there's nothing left. The outline disappears with that which ever seemed to be happening at all. Then, you know, no one stands at the finish line and says, "Oh, you know, I I got it."
41:47 It's just extraordinary. Hi Alexis. >> Hello. >> Hi. Um, I just wondered does this exposure have any application to relative experience at all? And if it doesn't, why doesn't it? >> Yeah. So, um, the exposure is not an object. Um it's not actually a a separate force knocking on the door of me and my life which I think is mine. Um the exposure is is is an absolute exposure really. It's a pointing out a
42:34 dynamic pointing out of what is and is not. And that simply defies objectification. So it it doesn't step into someone's life. It points out the whole fallacy of life and death as a polarity which is therefore completely unknowable. And so if it was an object then it would step into a relative situation and say this is you know this is what you can do or this is how it works. This is applicable, [clears throat] navigable negotiable you know, um, transactional. This is going to have these effects, cause and effect. Yeah. So, the the
43:20 exposure is not on a relative situation. It's not it doesn't relate to anything because it's absolute. Yeah. An absolute exposure. And and last um in the last zoom you said there was no relative [snorts] like there was no relative like experience or um there was no absolute and relative. Can you say a bit more about >> that? >> Yeah. So okay well okay let's um playfully just use a metaphor. The met the metaphor would be that the absolute is the picture on the box and the relative is that picture split into a thousand
44:07 jigsaw pieces. That's that's like that would perhaps be a suitable metaphor if there ever was one. The the the jigsaw of a thousand pieces is is the same as the picture on the box, but it's abstracted. It's like loads of different pieces and therefore objects. They're things. And the absolute is the same, but it's just not abstracted. And that's what that's what I would suggest is the relative absolute. Yeah. And um there isn't a separate individual that could see it as relative and that could also see it as absolute because the self is actually an illusory piece of the
44:53 jigsaw puzzle. So you can't see the whole picture because it's it's an illusion of being a part a piece of the puzzle. Yeah. Which doesn't exist actually. So the the jigsaw puzzle is an illusion and the picture is all there is. Unabracted picture. Yeah. >> I won't even pretend to get that. [laughter] You're not a keen of not keen on jigsaw puzzles. [laughter] >> Um I really liked the your um Zoom with Tobias over the weekend. like I I watched it later would be great to do something like that in this time zone at some point.
45:38 >> Um >> one thing that I wanted to um or that that I noticed it's it's quite interesting if you were to bias maybe there's a passion that comes about discussing something or um uh or maybe a dismissiveness of something or whatever it is. There's no energy behind it like it it feels still very easy. But if somebody is talking and there is like even if what they're saying makes sense there's some kind of position ality or something behind it's actually quite difficult to >> listen to and I just wondered if you could speak to that a little bit. Um, I would I would suggest that that's
46:25 because [clears throat] it's transactional and it's relative therefore >> and it betrays the the the words of what's actually being communicated. Um, if it seems like there's a position behind the words, then it has to seem like there's a position in front of them and then the whole separate reality is being validated, whether it's subliminally or or outrightly and deliberately. Um, so the words not coming from someone, therefore they can't be, if they're not coming from someone, they can't be going to someone. There's no one being met. Therefore, and that's therefore these words aren't for anyone or anything. They're just words wording. And it's totally immediate. And
47:11 that's that's an embrace really. A total embrace which isn't actually embracing something. It's just embrace all by itself. Energetically, it can seem apparent in the world of abstraction again that certain words seem to come from certain place. And if they're coming from a certain place, they seem to carry an agenda that there that there's something to say from some position and that that's happening for a reason. It's it's happening because that person which isn't really there already wants something. >> Yeah. >> Thanks.
47:57 >> It's like all the time I'm a subject and you're an object. There's a there's a relationship there at play. There's a transaction at play. And I know that makes it sound a little bit bitter or insidious and it's not meant like that because all of this is totally innocent. It doesn't matter whether it's a teacher, a speaker. Um, yeah, it's it's it's all innocent because there's no autonomy involved. Neither is their ownership. But it can seem like there's a transactional energy about that if it seems like there's two separate positions relating to each other. What's in it for me? Yeah. >> Yeah. And the and because of that transactional energy, it feels like
48:42 there's a almost like a domination or there's some >> something that feels um Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. And it seems as though that in the appearance of it, there's an intuition that that something doesn't feel quite right about that. But I can't put my finger on it. I don't know what it is, but something doesn't quite feel right.
50:16 Hi Alexis. >> Hey S. How are you? >> Good. Thank question. Can I can I say that only continuous thing is nothing? >> A loser pretending to be something. It would seem >> pretend to be something. Yeah. Yeah. It's the illusion of existence. Yeah. The illusion of existence. If all
51:04 there is is the color blue, then the color blue doesn't exist. Yeah. >> So if all there is is now, then now doesn't exist. If all there is is this, this doesn't exist because there's nothing in which it relates to or stands apart from. So the illusion of continuity is an illusion of contextualization and that breeds the illusion of things happening that they are actually happening they are standing out but if it's if there's no context there's nothing to relate to this it's yeah it's completely unfathomable
51:52 that this is all there is nothing can stand apart from that so it's too immediate to to contextualize or to relate to, to defy, to label, to categorize. It just absolutely defies all labels names definitions categorizations contextualizations. Yeah. Yeah. You you can't you can't uh intellectually there there seem to be an attempt to attempt intellectually hold on to hold on to this >> that that energetically would seem to be a kind of clinging for categorization [clears throat] or contextualization. >> Then it's object then it's something
52:37 that we have >> and we're apart from. We can have a good look at it and then that's like illusorily confirming distance and separation existence at large. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Thank you.
54:18 So if all there is is this, then this doesn't exist because there's nothing to stand out, to stand apart, to split from. There's nothing to relate to, and there's nothing to be known. There's nothing to be figured out. There's nothing to hold on to and there's nothing to let go of. There's only aimously this. This doesn't exist in relation to an illusion. This doesn't exist in relation to me or know me. There just is this. It's so total and absolute that it's completely embracing of whatever appears to be. Well, then really therefore nothing
55:03 needs to happen. Ultimately, nothing needs to happen. Nothing needs to change. Nothing needs to be different. And nothing needs to stay the same. It's so abundantly total. It's completely incomprehensible that any imaginable thing is it. And yet there are no things to be it. unabracted, unknown, unownable unrelatable undoable. It just is what is that is the freedom that is already. >> Thanks everyone. Much love.
55:49 >> Thank you. >> Thank you for coming. Brighton this weekend for those who fancy showing up. >> Oh, have a fab time in Brighton. >> Thanks, love. London the weekend after that. Prague the weekend after that meeting. No show with Tobias as well this Saturday evening as well in GMT time. It's all good fun for no reason at all. See you soon. >> Thank you. Bye. >> Thank you.
