Full transcript of “BOMBSHELL: Epstein Disturbing ‘Baby Emails’ Explained by Nick Bryant”. Click a timestamp to open the video at that moment. Need another video? Use the YouTube transcript generator.
0:00 He's emailing Epstein and he's talking about ways that he can enhance a baby to suck. >> So, what were the most surprising things for you uh to come about through this dump? I mean, you yourself uh were mentioned. >> Yes. In in a in a good way. >> Yeah, I No, I was going to say I should apologize because I had said on my last show that there were two people who came off well in the Epstein files and that was Norman Finkelstein for basically saying that I don't know if you saw this amazing exchange but he said that yeah that Epstein and uh Dersowitz I think should be throttled uh and then Bernie Sanders because uh Lawrence Summers was
0:46 complaining that his kids liked Bernie Sanders. I'm going to do a screen share of your own appearance. Two days ago, I posted an email about one of Epstein's redacted minions putting out an all points bulletin on me with an accompanying picture warning that they should be aware of me. That email was followed by two emails about me. The next email was one of Epste's was from one of Epste's hench women, Leslie Grath, and sent to a redacted name with the following subject. Alarm, remind J to call Nick Bryant. To remind Jeffrey Epste to call Nick Bryant. A third email from Grath to Epstein said that Epstein should call me. What's strange about the third email is that Epstein's email is redacted because his email address is never redacted. Epste never called me, but I'm nonetheless grateful that I was able to alarm the scumbags. And then here it is. Just a
1:33 heads up, there's a journalist calling around again. His name is Nick Bryant. This is what he looks like, so you are all aware. Uh reminder to call him. Um then there are a bunch of Bill Sharer who's also a journalist. Saul Worman, uh, Mark Packer, Chris Knight, Barau, Nick Bryant. So, those, I guess, were all the people who they wanted to be him to call. I assume to perhaps p uh dissuade from from talking about it. >> He never called me, so I never had the pleasure of talking to him, >> right? >> I'm sure it would have been a memorable phone call. >> Yeah. I mean, the thing that's so disturbing about this is that there's obviously going to be, and I feel like it's important to to say this up top, and I I've said this, there's obviously going to be some stuff that's not real that
2:19 was either uh just claims that were made that we now know are not real or things that are inserted there intentionally, I think, to poison the well. Um, what do you have to say about that just so people can kind of be aware and vigilant of that? Well, these things that they are talking about are a lot of these evils. I mean, I've heard them over the years, but one has to be cautious when treading in certain areas. Like, here's an email from UCLA neuroscientist Mark Trammo. He's got an MD and a PhD and he's emailing Epstein and they're talking he's talking about ways that he can enhance a baby to suck and actually UCLA has let go of him. So,
3:08 I I think that's about as evil an email as you can come up with. And I think that because that particular email is being sent to Jeffrey Ebstein, it's difficult to conclude otherwise. >> Right. And because they let him go, right? >> Yeah. I mean, that's the the pro the problem is that um and I'm just going to show this because it it really I mean I I'll there's going to be a lot of trigger warnings from this because it's obviously incredibly disgusting, but you know, one of the things that is I think also dangerous about this or or is how it re they seem so unbelievable. It's going to be so easy for people to dismiss this as too far-fetched to be real. Um, but I mean obviously these
3:55 things um some of them are real. Hi J, thanks for sending Richard Johnson my way. I trust the uh kind words I shared with him are acceptable to you. If not, please let me know ASAP. I'm on the road. My cell is okay. Um then I hope you realize this recognition for all you do for so many opinion overdue and welldeserved. Cheers Mark. PS was just reading to today that newborns will suck on a pacifier more vigorously if it triggers playback of a recording of her his mother's voice than another woman's voice. Have you read David Brookke social animal was number one at New York Times books for quite a while. Mark J. Trammo, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology. David Geffen, School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of
4:41 Musiccology, UCLA Herb Albert, School of Music, Director The Institute. Wow. For music and brain science, co-director, University of California Multicampus Music Research Initiative. And Mark Trammo writes again, um, PS. Richard Johnson just wrote to me to tell me his editor decided not to run the piece. Here's what Richard wrote. Sadly, my editor thinks too much has been written about Jeffrey and is spiking the story. Or that's the Mason I was given. >> They have problems with typos. The Epstein class. I mean, I have problems with typos, but uh but mine are pretty minimal compared to the Epstein class. >> With these guys, they're in their own world. >> And it's it's a very horrific universe. And I started digging into Epstein in
5:28 2011 and that's when the All Points Bulletin went out on me. And I wrote a book about another trafficking network that almost is kind of like a FC is kind of a carbon copy of that work. It's called the Franklin Scandal. And I came across horrific content when I wrote that book. And I've subsequently spoke at various conferences about child trafficking. And the content of these emails is known by a number of therapists that consult extreme abuse victims and and trauma victims. And there was there's a great study. It's called the extreme abuse survey. And your uh audience can Google
6:16 extreme abuse survey. And it was of 14 people that have been through different types of extreme abuse. And the stuff that's being talked about in these emails, a lot of it was talked about in the extreme abuse survey. So this isn't coming out of nowhere. I mean, sadistic pedophile networks, this is status quo. >> Yeah. Um, I think that that that that email is really disturbing about the sucking thing. Then you have references to women as shrimp. Um, references to women as like muffins and steak. You have people uh talking about how they like white shrimp and not pink shrimp and how disgusted they are by black
7:03 shrimp. I mean, the one thing I am kind of surprised about, I have to admit, is that they would put so much of this in writing. Um, but I guess they're so used to such a sense of impunity. >> I believe that's it. Yeah. Jeffrey Estee traffked underage girls for 25 years and he was unsca I mean he had to spend a little time in a county jail, but the original indictment that was going to be brought against him by the feds in 2008, it was a 60count indictment and count 51 was child trafficking. that indictment would have put or those indictments would have put Jeffrey Epstein in prison for the rest of his life. But yet he did 13 months and then when he was doing
7:49 time in the county jail, he was able to get out during the day and and then there was a little room where his quote unquote legal assistance he he could meet his legal assistants and that whole thing was was very much a joke.
