هو ايه اللى بيحصل في موبايلات سامسونج بالظبط فى السوق بعد مرور نصف عام 2025 | النهـــــــــــاية😱😱

Brief Summary

This video discusses the current state of Samsung mobiles, particularly in the Egyptian market, addressing recent issues and user concerns. It examines problems such as manufacturing defects, screen flickering, processor choices, pricing strategies, and accessory omissions. The video also compares Samsung's approach to that of Apple and Chinese competitors, and concludes that while Samsung faces challenges, it remains a strong company with the potential to address these issues and maintain its market position.

  • Manufacturing defects in A36 and A56 models.
  • Samsung's use of flicker screens and Exynos processors.
  • Rapid price drops after release and the "empty box" trend.
  • Samsung's strengths, such as software updates and dust/water resistance.

Introduction: Samsung's Current Market Position

The video starts by addressing concerns about Samsung's future, especially in the Egyptian market, following recent issues with their mobile phones. It questions whether Samsung is offering value for money and whether users are losing trust in the brand. The presenter aims to answer these questions by discussing the real problems Samsung faces and whether it can remain a competitive company or if users will switch to other brands.

Manufacturing Defects: The Camera Frame Issue

The first problem discussed is the manufacturing defect in the A56 and A36 models, specifically the camera frame movement. The camera frame could detach and break the back of the phone. The presenter clarifies that this issue isn't due to cheapness but rather a design choice. Samsung opted for an easier manufacturing process by making the camera frame separate from the back, instead of designing them as one integrated part.

Screen Flickering: Samsung vs. Competitors

The second issue is Samsung's continued use of flicker screens, which can cause eye strain in low lighting conditions. The presenter notes that Samsung seems to be following Apple's lead in this regard, rather than focusing on what Android competitors like Honor and Realme are doing to reduce flicker. The presenter argues that Samsung should differentiate itself from Apple since it operates within the Android ecosystem, where users have many alternatives.

Processor Choices: Exynos vs. Qualcomm

The third problem is Samsung's persistent use of Exynos processors, despite user complaints about overheating. Even when using Qualcomm processors, they sometimes revert to Exynos in subsequent models, like with the A56. The presenter suggests Samsung is trying to prove the quality of its processors but should instead listen to user feedback and prioritize their preferences. The lack of developer support for Exynos processors in games is also highlighted as a drawback.

Pricing Strategy: Rapid Price Drops

The fourth major issue is the rapid price drops of Samsung mobiles after their release, sometimes by as much as 5,000 to 6,000 pounds. The presenter questions why Samsung doesn't offer the lower price from the beginning, as these drops upset early adopters and erode brand loyalty. Unlike some other companies that maintain their prices for longer periods, Samsung's quick price reductions discourage users from buying their phones at launch.

Accessory Omissions: The "Empty Box" Trend

The fifth defect is the "empty box" trend, where Samsung omits essential accessories. While Apple can get away with this due to its unique iOS ecosystem, Samsung's Android competitors are often more generous with included accessories. The presenter suggests Samsung might be doing this to offer mobiles at a cheaper price, but it ultimately harms the user experience. Additionally, providing a 45-watt charging head but only including a 25-watt cable is seen as misleading.

Additional Defects: Network Issues and Outdated Technology

The video identifies several other flaws, including weak network performance in mid-range and budget Samsung phones, which the company attributes to safety concerns about radiation levels. The presenter finds this explanation unconvincing, as flagship phones have strong networks without such issues. Other shortcomings include not using silicon carbon technology and IP69 water resistance, both of which are common among Chinese competitors.

Screen Design: Notch vs. Punch-Hole

The presenter criticizes Samsung's continued use of the old-style notch design in cheaper phones like the A20 and A16 series. While the A16 might be somewhat acceptable due to its other features like an AMOLED screen and ultra-wide camera, the A20 series is seen as simply cheap. The presenter urges Samsung to adopt punch-hole screens, which most other companies have already implemented.

Conclusion: Is This the End for Samsung?

Despite these numerous defects, the presenter concludes that this is not the end for Samsung. The identified problems are solvable and don't necessarily spell the company's demise. Samsung remains a best-selling brand, with models like the A16, A34, and A36 offering good value for money. Samsung's strengths include long-term software updates and dust/water resistance. The presenter emphasizes that Samsung needs to listen to user feedback and adapt to stay competitive, particularly by focusing on what Chinese companies are doing in the Android market.

Summarize any YouTube video in seconds

Get summaries like this one for any video, in your language, with the free Summ app.

Download on the Apple Store
Get it on Google Play

Transcript

Full transcript of “هو ايه اللى بيحصل في موبايلات سامسونج بالظبط فى السوق بعد مرور نصف عام 2025 | النهـــــــــــاية😱😱”. Click a timestamp to open the video at that moment. Need another video? Use the YouTube transcript generator.

0:00 What is happening to Samsung mobiles this year in the market and is this really the end for Samsung, especially in the Egyptian market after the problems that have happened with Samsung recently? This is what we know together during the video before I tell you anything, like, subscribe and activate the bell so that you always receive everything new from us. Your like and share make a huge difference in spreading the video. Also, don't forget to follow me on all other platforms while you are going down to do so. Don't forget to pray for the Prophet. Now let's go into the details and find out if this is really the end for Samsung and after that everyone will follow or belong or buy mobiles from Chinese companies, which is better, or will Samsung continue to exist and will it remain Samsung? Welcome, I am Muhammad, and this is your mother’s reviews channel. Surely if you are following, you have seen

0:46 what happened recently with Samsung, especially in the A36 and A56 categories, where it turned out that the camera frame is stuck and is being pulled sharply and breaking the back, and so on. So what is the story exactly? Has Samsung started to go out on a limb and offer mobiles that do not offer value for money? Samsung’s problem is in the pricing, and after a week or two, you find the mobile phone destroyed, and thus you lost your money. This also created a crisis of trust between users and Samsung. We will know all of this during the video. I will answer all the questions in your mind, but let us first talk about the real problems facing Samsung. Is Samsung really, after all this, still a big company that offers value for money, or will users in the coming period start choosing another company? Let us take the problems one by one and see what the solutions to these problems are and why Samsung

1:33 You solve these problems. The first problem that appeared was the manufacturing problem that was present in the i56 and i36, especially the i56, the camera frame movement, which could become someone if you work on it hard the frame could come off and break along with the back, and here you might look at the subject as if this could be cheapness from Samsung, but I will not tell you that it is cheapness because this is not true, because actually these phones have a respectable design and a lot of money was spent on them, and the i56 was well spent on it. It is a really durable phone and close to Samsung’s flagship phones in manufacturing materials, but the problem was ease, not cheapness, so what does that mean? Samsung could have designed the camera frame and the back as one part, but Samsung chose the easy way, which is to design the back

2:19 and make the camera frame separate and then stick it on. The whole story is that those in charge of design at Samsung chose to take it easy instead of making the frame and back design one part, which would take more effort from them. They decided to make the back and frame alone and stick the two together, and this was not a good point because they did it in the S25 Ultra, and it was also objected to by some users. They should have taken care of something like this. The first point is not cheap, it is an ease, nothing more. As for the second point, and this is perhaps the point that users complain about the most recently, Samsung’s use of flicker screens with a high screen is supposed to produce very strong flashes that appear when the lighting is very low. Companies should have taken into consideration in the recent period to

3:06 reduce flicker So that it protects your eyes when you are, for example, holding the mobile in a place, for example, in the dark, or you are sitting on your mobile at night before you go to sleep, and Samsung Steel is still, until now, using the most flickering screens among all the Android companies, and this, for me, means that Samsung does not look at the Android companies, but rather looks at Apple, and if you pay attention to Apple, you will find that Apple also has the same problem, that the screens of the expensive iPhones also have flicker that is evident, unlike, of course, Honor, Realme, and these companies that have started to use screens that are more comfortable for the eye, and here I frankly blame Samsung because they also use or exploit the easy way, which is that I see myself as a competitor to Apple, so I will do what Apple would do. If Apple used flicker-free screens, I would use the same as them,

3:52 but this is something that cannot be done by Samsung because you are not a company that has an independent system, you are not offering a system that is strange to the rest of the companies, so what There is nothing but its own phones that it offers to do what it wants. No, you offer Android, and Android is present on many phones, so it is easy for me to dispense with you completely and go to any other company. But Apple offers iOS, and in order for any user to take Apple’s software, he must buy Apple phones. Apple has contempt for a certain thing. Accordingly, there is nothing like the iPhone, so the user swallows anything they do. But with Android, here, if it affects many alternatives and many competitors, I can buy from sleep. This is something I hope those in charge of Samsung take into account. As for the third point,

4:38 Samsung is stubborn and repeatedly uses Exynos processors despite the repeated complaints that these processors heat up in an abnormal way. Even when they use a Qualcomm processor, they use it in one generation after another, as happened with the I36. They actually used Qualcomm, and we were all happy. Now we come to the 56 We also found the Exynos processor. I think Samsung is trying to prove that its processors are good and is trying until its last breath to try and test its processors more and more and offer them to the user more and more, but that's it, as long as the user has a bad idea about your processors, then you are missing out on installing it or just see what the user wants and do it. This is what Samsung is determined to annoy users with and does not do. It is also determined in most of

5:23 its versions to use Exynos processors, which have been proven more than once to overheat. However, there is no development or even development of a cooling system to deal with these sterile processors, especially since the most annoying thing about these processors is that the developers do not support them in games. Therefore, the Snapdragon processor may have a lower GPU and play at higher settings than the Exynos because the developer has not adjusted the Exynos processor and does not let the game draw its full power. Fourth point, this is a disaster for me. It is a disaster for any user who buys from Samsung, as the prices of Samsung mobiles have dropped by five and by 6,000 pounds after their release. This is something strange to me. When you, Samsung, are going to cheapen the mobiles anyway, why did n’t you offer the ideal price from the beginning when I was announcing the mobile? I mean, the first time the

6:09 i36 was released, it was 16,000 pounds. Within a week, the mobile became 15. Well, didn’t we price it at 15 from the beginning? The first time the i56 was released, it was 22,000 pounds, and now it is 21,000 pounds. Why didn’t we price it at 21,000 pounds from the beginning? This move upsets people who have it or users who have a sense of affiliation with the company. I am going to get your mobile because it retains its value for a while, and I love this company very much. So when I find that every time I run to get the mobile as soon as it is released and support this company, I see myself losing my money after a week Or two, I will not go buy from Samsung again, why aren’t there companies that have released mobile phones for a long time and still maintain their price in the market? I only said 200-300 pounds, and that is a long time, but in less than a week you will lose 1,500 and 2,000

6:55 pounds on a mobile phone, and in the coming days, more and more Samsung mobiles will be released, and this is a policy that I do not understand, frankly. I hope that they also address it because this may alienate users, especially those who love Samsung, because he will not continue to love you as a company over his personal interest and losing his money. As for the fifth defect, the empty box, here I also do not understand the matter. Well, Apple, as I said, is a separate company, so it provides what it wants and does for its users what they want. You will not be able to take the iOS except from Apple, so you are forced to do this, especially the people who love Apple, but Samsung, why? Empty box and all the companies around you from Android except Honor, which started imitating Samsung and recently they are offering a complete box. Chinese companies are professionals in this point. If you want to compete and take the market for your account, see what your competitors are offering and offer the same or

7:43 offer better than them, not worse than them. This is a point I expect that Samsung is doing as well, motivated by giving you mobiles at a cheaper price. They save on shipping and these things in order to give you a suitable price and be competitive and offer value for more price. As for the defect that comes after that, and this is still apparent this year, they give you a 45-watt spray as a gift and at the same time they do a move that is not necessary for 30. They remove the 45-watt cable and give you a 25-watt cable because you will still have to go buy the cable at your own expense. In the end, we will not leave you alone until you buy something at your own expense, and this is also One thing I blame the company for is that since we have provided a 45-watt charging head and developed the best charging speed, I give the user a 45-watt cable in the box. I don’t fool the user and let him go and buy it, and in the end he discovers that the cable he

8:28 has is a 25-watt cable and he needs to get the 45- watt one. The next flaw, and this is perhaps one of the strongest flaws for most people, is that Samsung phones in the middle and economic category have a relatively weak or average network problem, and this is true. Samsung’s claim here is that they do this so that their phones do not have a high radiation rate or anything like that and are safe, although I am not convinced by this talk because Samsung’s flagship phones have a strong network, so how can there be radiation in the flagship and the economic middle category, and there is no such thing? It would be a disaster for you to say something like this. And you intend to expect yourself in this view, two points, both of which are also considered a defect to some extent, not using silicon carbon technology, and all the Chinese companies that compete with you and use Android like you used it and are working with the Lism On imitating Apple, although as I

9:15 told you, Apple is separate and alone, Apple has stolen its users, and they have no one else, frankly, but you can replace it, by the way, there are many who offer Android, not you alone, I mean, and the One UI also has other respectable interfaces like it, not just the One UI, I mean the best interface in the world, you will remain through One UI, the user kidnapper, you will not be able to do this, so you are different from Apple. I hope you focus on the Chinese companies and not focus on Apple. The idea is also that we have not used IP69 yet, although all the Chinese companies have used it, so Samsung is very late, and finally, the last defect is Samsung’s continued use of the OLED screen The old style notch drops with the cheap phones which are the A20, A16, A15 series and so on and I see it frankly from my point of view that with the A16 series it might be a bit swallowed because they offer you a strong combination they

10:02 give you the ultra wide camera and the main camera and they give you an AMOLED screen and excellent colors and they give you a good processor so they might cut the idea of ​​the screen in order to give you the phone at a good price but with the A20 series no I see that this is cheapness and a bit of ease it is not good that you always mean that you make the user go to a version and expect a version and make him go to the version I mean if you focus you will find them telling you go to the A16 forget about the A26 and come to the A36 and forget about the A56 and go to the flagship killer. So why why are there specific series or specific phones from the series You are dying with this way. I hope that in the coming period you will provide whole punch screens because most of the companies have started doing this. Currently, only Samsung is continuing at this point. After all these defects, is this the end for Samsung? I can tell you that no.

10:49 These are problems that exist in a company that can be solved. They do not mean that they are problems that can end this company. Evidence of what I am saying is that Samsung is still one of the best-selling companies to date. The A16 is considered one of the best phones in its category. The A34 is one of the best phones that offer high value for the price in its category. The A36 is one of the phones that offer high value for the price in its category and has proven its success. Samsung is still Samsung, it has not yet achieved success. Many people still love Samsung, especially the idea of ​​supporting six years of software update or the long period of updates. Samsung is one of the first companies to do this. Supporting dust and water resistance in the category. Few of the first companies that did this at the beginning of the middle category with the 34 and so on, Samsung, as it has flaws and things we are talking about and negatives, just as Samsung also has advantages and

11:36 many respectable things, especially since it is the only company that is stable and constant, by the way, the ultra-wide camera, meaning that Chinese companies are now in cheap phones, remove my son, the ultra-wide camera and put a main camera, Samsung is still stable and gives you as a user the main and ultra-wide cameras, so let's say that Samsung is a respectable company, a large company that may make mistakes sometimes, like what happened one year when Apple released the iPhone 6 and the phone came to people's pockets after a while, and then they took the phone and released it as the iPhone 6s, so every company has a stumble and a period in which it has problems, so the problem of the i56 is not a problem that could destroy the Samsung company All the problems that I mentioned have been around for a while, and they are not problems that will destroy Samsung. The stage that Samsung will reach that these problems will actually destroy it is for it to continue in this situation and still not

12:22 listen to the users. I hope that you will listen to the users, who will be in the coming period? By the way, I don't like Samsung, I mean I don't like to hold Samsung phones, I don't like any company. I'm a neutral man and I don't own any Samsung phone, nor have I dealt with the company itself. However, I think that Samsung has recently been offering very stable software. It's a respectable company that has many successful phones. They keep lowering their prices. But I hope that if you want to lower your prices, I hope that when you advertise on the phone, you offer a price, but not after a week or two, and then go and throw away the price of your phone and burn it. As a result, you lose those who love you and would buy you the phone. So I hope that Samsung solves the problems that I talked about. It's not necessary that they all be solved, one by one, over the coming years. I hope, I hope that Samsung removes this from your minds first. Focus on the Chinese companies because you use Android and they use Android.

13:10 You don't offer different software or anything like Apple, so that your users can swallow your rocks. I'm definitely waiting for your opinion in the end. If you have any negative things to say about Samsung that I didn’t mention, please leave them in the comments below. Do n’t forget to like, subscribe, and activate the bell so you always receive everything new from us. As usual, wait for me for a new video. Bye.

Share

More video summaries