خلاص👆قانون طرد سكان الإيجار القديم⛔️بدء العد التنازلي📣دخل حيز التنفيذ

0:00 From Cairo and the governorates, our brothers and sisters, our children working and residing abroad, and those who see us from the brothers, it happened, happened, happened, welcome. Expelling residents from their places of residence is a matter of time. The decision was issued. The law was issued. It does not need any explanation. Its name is in it. As you read in the title, the law to evict residents will pass as is. As I told you yesterday from the kitchen, the law will not receive any amendments. Without any amendment, the law will pass as

0:46 is, with the expulsion of 6 million families and a complete floating of the relationship. Complete liberalization of the relationship. Complete liberalization. If my apartment costs 5,000 pounds in rent, or something like it costs 5,000 pounds in rent, and you agreed as a resident to pay 50 pounds only, I do not want you to. I will tell you no. If you pay her 10,000, I do not want you to go out. Today there is great joy, joy, joy, joy, and joy for every owner of an old property in Egypt. The

1:32 great joy here is that without even filing a lawsuit, he has the full right to reclaim his apartment by virtue of the law and the new constitution. By virtue of the new law and constitution and this huge pass, the owners are now celebrating a great and glorious victory. I tell you, they will not even spare a lawyer to go to court and raise the matter. The matter is over. You will tell me now, I paid 20,300 pounds in 1990. I paid Maarouf in 1980 and

2:18 fixed the apartment and spent and worked. If I had not lived in it and bought land and built on it, I would not have bought it. Why, my brother? The new law did not leave you any compensation. You do not have anything. God willing, you paid 100,000 pounds in the eighties and nineties. You do not have anything. Leave in silence, my love. Prepare the bags, Dad. Start like this. If the apartment is crowded and full of furniture, see what is necessary and what is not. What can you do without? Arrange the cars that will move you. Start. See the new place you will move to. Start. Search. Start. See where you will go.

3:04 See the 238,000 apartments. Government people, see if you will stay in the fruits or in the good tidings because of course not all apartments will be good. Of course you need to choose the neighbor before the house. You need to make a good choice. This way the landlord crisis will be solved and the residents crisis will begin. The residents are not divided into tranches as we said yesterday, but they are all outside. An open-ended expulsion order has been issued. The law began to apply last night. We are now in the countdown. The

3:54 resident will not stay in the apartment he is in as long as he did last year, not half of it, or a quarter of it. You have a maximum period of seven years. If the owner is a little clever and you violate the terms of the law by raising the rent, he has the right to evict you in the first, second, or third year as a resident. But the law here, the law here, if there was a division of tranches, it would be possible today to return 300,000 apartments to their owners. Today he takes them from the residents and gives them to their owners. Empty apartments. The unjust residents who took these apartments are

4:41 closing them down. The one who closed them down. There is one year left, and for those who have 10 and 20, there are people who have closed their apartments. It will be 20 years. If the law divides them into tranches, will it benefit the owners of the 300 apartments or 1,000 apartments? The first thing is that we give the 300,000 apartments a seven-year opportunity. Why are they idle and closed? And those who rented them are either not present in the country, or if they were present, they would not benefit from it. You should have given it to them quickly. The shops were given a five-year grace period, not seven. Housing is seven, and the shops are five. If someone takes a shop and rents it out, you

5:27 give him five years until they return it to the owner. They return it now. Today you would have taken it and returned it to the owner. If we divide the tranches, people think that dividing the tranches will be harmful to the owners. On the contrary, the owners will benefit first. The resident is harmed. After all, you will tell me that he benefited before, and all of this talk is your right, but what is happening now will harm. The resident, sooner or later, that's it. But now we want the owners to get their rights, and the state is evading its role in strengthening the resident. That's it, and the resident has God with him. This is the law today. The bottom line is that all the owners will get back their six million apartments

6:16 within seven years. They will all pass away, and all the residents, the six million families, will all be impoverished. That's it. The state will do nothing. It will take taxes from the owners, which will increase its tax community, and it will collect taxes and sell its 238,000 apartments that no one wants to buy. They will have seven years left, or it will sell them under the rent-to-own system, which is like the installment system, instead of paying rent

7:02 over 30 years. No one wants to buy them. The president himself once sat and complained, saying to you, "I am your daughter, and you refused to come." Okay, and he told you, "We will go and inform the Ministry of Housing." And yet, in order to build something new, the Ministry of Endowments and the Ministry of Housing said, “I don’t have anything, so I’ll go to the Ministry of Urban Communities. No one will build anything. No one will do anything. No one will do anything. The law, if today there was a division of segments, I’d tell you, and 300,000 empty apartments were transferred to the owner immediately, but it gave them a grace period, such that what is this grace period? Tomorrow, if he turns on the water tap and turns on two lights, it will be as if it were housing.

7:52 While it did not give a grace period to those who need the apartment themselves, the people are the ones who really need the apartment and have no alternatives and are dying from the pension of widows of divorcees. People are women and support the general public, even if they never get married, but their sisters are around their necks and they live with them. All this talk did not give them an opportunity, but it gave an opportunity to the able tenants who rented their apartment furnished. I mean, it is possible that the apartment is not empty, but he rents it furnished with the rest, like a family Inside and his family, we don't know them in downtown, and even in the Cairo University area, they do it. Even in Giza, there are students. All of you will know this. I mean, you must have come across it, or your son lived there or something like that. There is a

8:37 rent by the bed, meaning they did not make the apartment a system of two beds on top of each other, two beds, two beds, two beds, like this. There is a bed and a room and a room, and so on. While the owner takes 5 pounds a month, he makes from it something from 5,000 to 8,900 a month and pays 5 pounds. And if the residents are foreign students, they pay $100 per bed, $100 a month, meaning 5,000 pounds. So, if the room has four beds and the apartment has two rooms, he makes 20,000, 20,000, and he gives the king what? 20 pounds, 50 pounds. This is evidence of an

9:24 opportunity for him, thank God, exploiting it. How will he prove that it is not exploiting it? But it was necessary today to return these apartments. For their owners immediately, 300,000 apartments are ready in a second clause. He told you, if the original resident, meaning not his children, children, children, we will give him a little longer than others. He said, no, it’s all the same. They didn’t give him a chance. By the way, the original residence will be a very old person. The original resident who lived before 96 today, may God grant him health. So, the law really means wait until he dies and take it

10:10 in the country. May God give all people a long life. He said to him, no, it’s all the same. Okay, he wants to complete the law with this terrifying speed. That’s it. I’ll tell you what the second step is. It’s not that the owners live in it. No, there will be demand for these apartments and auctions to buy them. These apartments will not be transferred to the owners you know now. There are no owners other than these owners. They will buy the apartments of Egypt, these 6 million apartments. In one way or another, the residents will be replaced by

10:59 other societal segments that will enter society, and many people will be thrown out into the street. This is not the owner’s fault. The owner is innocent of this. The owner has endured for 20, 30, and maybe 40 years. That is, his father, grandfather, and father are fed up with him, and it will not be useful for his children to be fed up with them either. Here is the role of the state, which was supposed to help them, but the state also decided not to help and complete this work for the benefit of the owners and finish it. Today they entered Parliament. They went ahead perfectly. They did not change a single article.

11:47 Yesterday, when I gave you the address, they had preliminary approval. They entered and caused a lot of tension among the residents. He told you, “No, I do not agree. This has been postponed. He thinks that if it is postponed until tomorrow, which was today, he will cancel the articles or cancel the eviction article.” Even Diaa Dawoud stood up and confronted Moneim in front of him. He said to him, “So, cancel the eviction article.” He said to them, “No.” They said, “We will withdraw from the parliament.” He said to them, “Do not withdraw and do not be afraid of this.” He did not agree to cancel the eviction article, which is the third. He expels the resident. He expels an article, half of which is he expels the resident and he will expel the resident, the biggest one. In age, she became an old woman with daughters. All the talk about chivalry and manliness and such talk is with your mother. There is no such talk outside

12:34 the part that was changed in the law yesterday. I said a number and they said I found a lot of people writing to her on the broadcast that 1000 pounds is a lot. 1000 pounds is a lot. 1000 pounds is a lot. Does he pay 50 pounds or 100 pounds? They will become 1000 pounds. I told you what? 1000 pounds is a number that, in relation to the circumstances, will not please the owner and will be a low satisfaction rate. If we want to satisfy the owner a little so that he leaves you living as a tenant who does not have money, it is not useful to tell him take 500 pounds and 700 pounds, first you will have 1000, and next year where will the law be today? The part that came in it is new, it set 1000 pounds. In fact, the minimum limit now will be 1000 pounds. Listen to the

13:20 text. The residential units are witnessing an increase of up to 20 times the current value in the distinguished areas, provided that the increase is not less than 1000 pounds per month. This is 000. This is 000. You will tell me, “Well, I am not a distinguished area at all.” In the middle areas, the increase is determined by at least 10 times, with a minimum of 400 pounds. Let’s say 400 pounds, for example, in Faisal. For example, in Faisal, the apartment is 4000, and you are a student. There is no 400. Even if you are an old student, something else good will happen. It happened in countries near us. At the beginning of the application, they would leave

14:06 families outside on errands and make sure that the house was empty. They would fill up everything for them and throw it in the street. They would come and say, “ The lock has been changed, the door has been changed.” Thank you. Go solve your problems in Tahrir. This relationship happened in countries like Germany, which I am telling you this story about. It happened in Turkey and it happened in Canada as well. The resident would come back and find all his things in the street, and the house was taken and the apartment Calon has changed as long as your needs are within the law, they were with you in the countries I am telling you about, your needs are outside, you do not own anything. Places rented to natural persons for purposes other than housing raise the rental value five times the current value. The

14:53 periodic increase every year is 15% more than the rental value, whether residential or non-residential, in order to create this balance. Those who have money will buy the apartment. These apartments will be sold. If they think that they will remain with the owners, good prices will be set and their price will increase. There will be very clean work that will happen now. Until the owners reclaim their apartments, this is fair. That the tenants who cannot afford it are thrown into the street. This is injustice, and the state has withdrawn its hand from it and will not find a solution for them, although it says that it is right that we will give them, not give them a solution. We will build them. Build if a bank ever starts. You will

15:40 see what you will do in your life. No one will ever wipe away your tears. Finally, people, don’t think that I am against the owner or the tenant. I am a person who tells you the situation today. Even today on television, they are discussing other things. They are discussing the Mediterranean earthquake that we discussed yesterday here. They are not discussing the old rent. It was approved and entered into force yesterday. Now, see. The

16:26 tenant, of course, feels that he was wronged because of the money he paid before. No one will give it to you. You lived with this money. This is the opinion of the owners and the opinion of the law as well, because what they discussed did not include an article that says that you will receive compensation or a vacancy allowance that you paid or all of this talk. No, MBC is discussing it now. Okay, you will not receive any compensation. When the minister was very tight-lipped from all the talk of the representatives, he said, “What?” He said, “We will make any amendment to the law later. It will not be possible later. Did you make it now? We cannot say that what

17:11 are the apartments in this housing if you are still on the air.” We say there are 238,000 empty apartments with the government, but there are 6 million families who will leave their apartments. I am telling you what will happen from the angels. The king does not want you. As far as he is concerned, you were unjust throughout the period of residence. It was 20, 30, 40 years. You, your mother, and your grandfather were unjust. What should he pay? He sees himself as his children who were displaced far away from him. They could have lived with him in the house, and you were not increasing the rent for him. He sees you as unjust. There is a time when he does not want to see your face. If the rent for the apartment is 100,000 pounds and

17:58 you agreed today, of course, you yourself pay 200 or 300 pounds. You will never agree to pay 10. Be careful. I mean, psychologically, you will say, “Okay, I will get a new apartment. It is nice. Go get it now.” But remember that you are against logic and want to live in it and pay 10,000 like any other woman. He does not want you. He has the right not to accept the number. What you will pay even if it was double for anyone He doesn't want you personally to get out The owner has the right now The law is on his side that you leave under the pretext that we do not agree on the price I mean if he is offering it for 10,000 rent and you agree He tells you well I want 15 You agree He tells you well I want 20 He doesn't want you to leave He has the

18:43 right to evict without a lawyer I mean he throws you out without a legal case The law is on his side Eight articles in the law are on his side The owner has the right to evict Read this Look at the word The owner has the right to evict everyone who comes after this Isn't there anything in it A A with the exception of if he is retired There is no No with the exception of if it is a woman and she has children and they are all girls I mean the meat of Egyptians is not there in the street There is no such talk my dear There is no exception The owner has the right to evict empty dots Throw as long as you do not agree on the price The verse The rent or the rent number

19:29 So if there is a tenant who can reach a clean page with the owner during these seven years The king did not have a child he wanted to marry into the apartment, nor did he want the house to be demolished, or anything like that. It would be useful to have a kind of new social contract. You would deal with the man in a respectful manner and give him raises, far from the law that tells you to pay the minimum of 1,000 pounds. No, if it is worth five and you can pay three, not 1,000, give him the three and tell him, “After seven years, don’t let me go.” I will try to work with you, and we will start as if we were renting the apartment from the beginning. He will say to you, “Well, go and make a contract. Go and make a contract for seven years or five years, and put in it the

20:14 state’s value of 15%, and give him three from the beginning, or leave it three at 20% for the first three years. The important thing is to try to reach 15% with him. Of course, the increase, which is supposed to be 15% inflation, so he maintains the same positive value. This 15, you will see and say, “This is a lot.” No, in relation to the real inflation number, it is normal for countries that Egypt is imitating rent increases by 50, 60, and 70% in the year 50, 60, and 70. That is, if someone pays 100 last year, he is paying 15,000 today, it is

21:00 not decreasing. He told me, for example, that Turkey’s increase was 80 last year. That is, if someone was paying 100,000, he now pays 18,000, as a freehold for the relationship. And after he pays 18,000 last year, he gets a 50% increase this year. Then, he gets 18,000 and pays another 50%. That is, he adds another 9,000 pounds, 9,000 liras, and next year, it looks like it will be 40 in his area. 40%. The inflation rate is multiplied by the price of the apartment, the rent of the apartment, and the owner is sitting there. There is no government intervening, no judge, and no lawyer. It is automatic,

21:46 and the government takes its taxes automatically. No one interferes. So, if you You can reach a formula with him and save yourself from being expelled and thrown out into the street. Germany, Mr. Samir, isn’t Germany more respected because it actually has a plan to fight inflation? You have inflation in Germany 10% 9 8 7 No, but you are talking about Turkey. Inflation is coming from 90, and in a country where inflation is 90% 90, and you are coming down in Egypt. It is coming from 45%, down from 45, and in Egypt, inflation is not taken into account like Turkey. Turkey takes into account the exchange rate. It takes into account the increase in fuel prices. Egypt doesn’t take into account fuel prices, it doesn’t take into account the increase in the

22:33 price of electricity, it doesn’t take into account the increase in the price of gas. All of this talk in Egypt. They don’t take into account inflation. If we take it into account, our inflation will come out to be above 60%. Then the law that tells you the increase in rental value in the 15th year will tell you 60%, but this is 15, because our inflation is calculated at 15 and will go down to 19 and a half, and it will come down a little, so it comes out to be two years. The next three, we will walk in this range. The best solution is for the tenants to start, each one of them with himself, to draw a smooth saliva with the landlord. The landlord now has the law, paper, and pen

23:19 on his side. That is, if you do not want to do this and you are not in the future or anything, as you wish, then you can see for yourself another way. But here I am talking about someone who cannot pay half a payment in these two or three years. But he will see his own way and be satisfied with this 1,000 pounds. He will pay the 1,000 pounds as a minimum instead of the 100 pounds and the 50 pounds and so on. He will pay the 1,000 pounds, and if he is in an average area, he will pay 400 pounds and take into account that after seven years, that is okay. But whoever is thinking of satisfying the landlord within the framework of these seven years, it is possible if you are able to pay

24:06 3,000 or 2,000 pounds. So you came and told him, it is true that the law is on your side, but after seven years, but now it is on my side. Pay within such and such a limit, no sir, I will float to you, here is the relationship and come on let’s write a contract, but this is of course the beginning, that you have finally left the old rent, but you want to guarantee that you will live well in the apartment, to guarantee that you sign a five-year contract that is renewed, for example, and write that every year the increase will be this much in what you agreed upon. The government says 15, add a little, sir, make it 20% or something, in exchange for you starting the count with 3000 pounds for an apartment like it now, for example, it is traded between 9 and 1000 pounds, for example, but you can leave it 1000 this year and

24:52 next year it will be 2000 and the year after that it will be four, for example, and you will be in compliance with the law, but what about the owner who is counting on when the day will come when I will throw him out of here, so there are no longer many options, I mean, even I say For your convenience, I will not discuss this issue on television. The law has been issued, and this is the maximum treatment that the government has been able to adopt. The issue is over. The six million families will leave their homes completely. The six million owners will get their homes back completely. It’s good now. The owner has ruined it, painted it, and

25:41 fixed it. This is not another standard. The issue is over. Those who do not have money will not be obligated. The state is implementing it immediately. Those who do not have money will not live. Go ahead, line up, get yourself a tent, and live with a pension of 3,000 pounds. By God, we are tired of talking about pensions not being applied to them. This has only been going on until yesterday. I swear, you are not like this. You are bringing in 12 million refugees, and you will take from them that 6 million will live in these apartments, and there are 6 million Egyptians who will sit in their place outside in the streets. So when you come and sit in

26:27 international forums and say that I did not make tents for them and integrated them into The people, no, you didn’t integrate them into the people, you replaced them with the people, or you replaced the people with them. The 6 million people include the oppressor and the oppressed, but they will all go with whoever has them and will be able to live in another place, and as for those who don’t have them, whoever doesn’t have them, the state should have removed them from the earth. Something today, they should have defined an item, for example, saying that pensioners are responsible for housing them. The state, for example, is responsible. He didn’t say it. There is no text. I ca n’t find a text to read to you. A text that excludes a category. Okay, you wo n’t exclude them, and this is the owner’s right. That all people should go.

27:14 Okay, he is Egyptian. Take it now. Say that I will choose 238,000 families from those who are not able. Forget about taking him, for example, from Cairo and settling him in Alexandria, and he doesn’t have people there. This is the place he lived in for 60 years of his life. Forget about this geographical transfer. The migration that we are facing now. This is the beginning of migration. The migration season will begin with Egyptians in forced migration. There were many English occupiers who entered, or a French campaign, and in displacement, this displacement, forget that it is displacement, but at least there is a wall to strengthen them and a roof to keep these people, and that’s it, a cover. I mean, he says that the 238,000 ready apartments, we

28:01 will start in the seven years to transfer every year 550,000 of the needy according to the following conditions. He did not say that, I did not find conditions. I mean, he says, for example, pensioners whose electricity bill is less than 1,000 pounds or 500 pounds, meaning he barely has a refrigerator and a washing machine, and he is a man who is not rich, meaning he does not have the ability to keep quiet. Why is the division of segments? The state has everything. Electricity and water connections, from which we can deduce the condition of their families. What are the salary components? If someone has an employee, I am the government. I know everything about him. I have the system,

28:50 so I can I live in it or I can see what his problem is from today there is no problem with regard to the owners the matter is over the owner within seven years he will take his apartment meaning there is no problem for the owners to discuss the issue meaning the owner with the worst luck is the one who will take his apartment after seven years but there are people who will take it after two years or three if there are problems to discuss they are the problems of the tenant who is unable to afford it who will leave the house and does not have the right to live in another one and he was sitting on the same floor with whom? The owner is

29:36 supposed to be taken by the state to apply it to itself, not because he likes to apply it to anyone as long as he is alive because he does not have his share like this within the framework of a system when the minimum salary for 10 years was 1200 pounds, they were stronger in relation to the dollar than the 7000 today with a difference of 50 dollars. Imagine the 1200 pounds of the past years are stronger than the 7000 pounds of today with 50 dollars. If you had liberalized the rental relationship 10 years ago, sir, according to the old law, not much would have happened, but now the gap has

30:23 become wide. It is not reasonable that you pay 100 pounds and the apartment will bring 10,000 in rent. It is not reasonable. If we ask the owner what do we say to the owner? What should we do with him? He thinks that he died during the past 20, 30, 40 years and he has the right to the right that you see in yourself. The government does not see it, neither empty nor How much did your father pay and how much did your grandfather pay? And how much gold did they bring? Let's stay in it anyway. Let them have debts. So, give us money to live with. No, you are not an heir. Discuss this in the committee. He said, "Well, we transferred it to an heir. Do you want to replace it?" No, fine? The state will replace it again. No, okay. See where you will take it. Until now, we are deciding who still has a

31:08 problem. The owner's problem has been solved. The state completely stood with the owner in terms of getting the apartment back. Its stance with the tenant was by not evicting him tomorrow and by letting him sit for seven years to manage himself. See where he will go. This is the last explanation we were able to reach with clear transparency. There are many things that can be done with me, from 600 to 800,000. The owner and the tenant, excuse me, have three, four, five, and six units instead of one unit, and they are living there.

31:56 This way, by harassing a resident like this, to harass the owner, imagine that 600 to 800,000 apartments will be taken today. This means that the law is implemented from 1/7 today, 2/7. You read that. Tonight, 600,000 units were taken. I don’t understand why you will leave these for a year, five or seven years. With a greedy owner and a greedy tenant, return them now. When you take the 300,000 empty apartments, give them to the owners, and the 600 to 800,000 apartments, the apartments of those whose owners are rich and have other apartments. In this way, you took a million apartments from the 6 million and

32:43 returned them today. Imagine how many owners were humiliated today, and there is no tenant who was harmed, harmed to the point that he will be thrown out into the street or does not know where to live or will go live somewhere. They have their apartments and live in them. Take these million apartments and give them an opportunity like them, like what? The poor person who He doesn't have it, you weren't a respectable law for the tenants. You treated people unfairly. They can't always be equal. I'll give you an example. What's her name? Al-Duwaji Nawal Al-Duwaji, a woman who, thank God, has nine villas, nine villas, and more than 21 apartments in different places. She

33:28 left them all and lives in an apartment in Zamalek. The rent she pays is I don't know, 45 pounds or 47 pounds. Imagine that Adalhadi, who is like her, gave her a chance for seven years. No, today was a day. If you really wanted to stand with the owner, you would have returned a million apartments. Today, to the owners, it's clear. There's 5 million left. Come on, let's divide them. There are 5 million apartments. They live in the apartments, they live, they live. I mean, there's an owner and there's a tenant, and this tenant lives in the apartment. He doesn't

34:15 have another apartment and saves it or leaves it empty. We're now talking about a real mass that benefits from the apartments. It benefits from the apartments. Okay, sir. Come on, professor. You, thank God, are well-paid. 5 7000 pounds, you are an employee, yes that is 7000 and your wife gets 7000, and you have a son working in a private company, so your total income is around 20,000 pounds. You have two years and you live in the apartment during this period, for example, I am talking about the dead minimum. I mean, if this family has 20,000 pounds, you pay him 100

35:03 pounds out of 20,000. This is logical. He will not take a period like someone who has entered from the beginning to the end, he and his wife did not bring a woman of 7000 pounds. He deserves the seven-year period. But the second one who has 200,000 pounds a month is not like someone with three, four, five or six. There are people who can move quickly. This means that if we do this story, after two years you will find around 2 million other apartments that the owners have reclaimed and started renting them at the high price or the market price.

35:50 Then the Sudanese, Syrians and Iraqis will come and take them. And the Afghan and we have the Chadian, why do all people have money? If the apartment is 10,000, that means 200 dollars, and it's nothing to him. On the contrary, he says to you, "Uncle, I won't write 10,000 in the contract. We'll give you 200 dollars. That's it. Stick to it. That's it. Next year, we won't increase by 15%, like the law. We'll increase by 40%. Okay, that's satisfactory. So, he's very happy that these nationalities are the ones who will take the 6 million apartments because they want to live among Egyptians, not in extremist areas. So, I'm

36:37 talking, until now, from the standpoint of benefiting the owner, not the tenant. The division was going to benefit the owner. People think that we want this system to continue all the time, and the owner is harmed in this way. We are Egyptians against Egyptians at all. But when I want to make a law, the law itself can benefit the owner and the tenant who deserves the benefit, just like you say every day, "I will sort out those who deserve the food subsidies." Are we the ones who will remove them? From the supply countries, they are not Egyptians, but Egyptians, what will you measure? He told you if he has a car and if he has an income, I don’t know how many mobile phones, what kind of a

37:22 standard, set them. Well, aren’t they the same standards in terms of income for the tenant? A tenant can wait a year or two. Why would you make him stay for seven? He is already fed up with you. You made him feel that it was an insult. Now in Egypt, the resident of the old rent is as if he is insulted, something that has become bad. The law is against him, the parliament is against him, the government is against him, and the landlords are against him. He feels that he is dwindling in society, something bad, compared to the crushed, fragile class that does not have this. They stay for seven years or they stay until you either support them with money that they give to the landlord and they float the value of the rent and they stay where they are, or until you provide them with an alternative apartment, so you take them like this. From this, you put them in this, but sidewalks, tents,

38:12 and people thrown out sleeping in mosques and churches, not Is this talk that I am saying to you useful in any mistake? Our talk is out of date, it is a lack of intelligence, but since you have been sending people to me since morning, they have adopted the law that I told you yesterday that they have adopted it. The only amendment is the 1000 pounds minimum for a distinguished apartment in a distinguished location, and I do not even explain what distinguished is in the law. I mean, I can tell you that this is a distinguished location, I will not take 400, I will take 1000. The second point, the third article, they were supposed to cancel the eviction article. He left it and

38:59 refused to cancel it, so this is an eviction law, the law of eviction. Now the owner will take his apartment anyway, he will take his apartment and the tenant will leave his apartment anyway, but in the sense of the seven years, I was supposed to start with the division, to respond to the injustice of the owners, the segments, I will satisfy them today in exchange for it extending the time period to satisfy many of the tenants who do not have them, but now I have done what is similar to what Nawal Al-Duwaji did He has 200 billion pounds, just like Hajja Fatima, who has 100 pounds. This is like this, no, this is not like this. This is a one-eyed law.

39:48 When he sees a billionaire, he is like someone who has 100 pounds. This is not like someone who does n’t have any food at home. This is like someone who wants to slaughter 100 camels immediately. These people are not the same. I want to tell you something because they portray us in society as if the landlords in Egypt have knives and will throw them out. If he has a woman with children and a pension, anything at all, he will immediately gut her and throw her in the street. As if our society meant that people would slaughter each other. This is not true either. This does not exist. [Music]

40:34 Even the state used to say from such-and-such a fund, the state will easily take care of these people. I mean, it is not from the mosque fund. In the end, he will tell you, what are there no neighborhoods? What will the neighborhoods do for you? They will collect money, and the king, the owner, and the father of the money, the owner, and the grandfather of the owner who tolerated people with pensions, money for 30 40 years, not because you told him that within seven years they would be evicted, he will come and take their things and throw them out of the place where you are portraying that there are 6 million wolves among Egyptians. The owner of an apartment will prey on the poor people who don’t have money. This is also not correct, I mean, but I agree with you on the latest ideas that have been put forward, the discussions that exist. The

41:19 largest sector of Egyptians is following their father’s advice to take care of so-and-so in the so-and-so family, as if they were your brothers, as if they were your siblings, and it remains a grandfather’s advice, or they are following it except for those who left the tenants and were left with someone who had a sharp tongue or bad performance or who, I mean, deserved what he was getting or was capable and has been exerting effort on the landlord for a long time. No one will stand with you, but the people we mean are these people, you will be merciful to them in general, but it would have been better for the state to be merciful to them [Music] Today, the state was supposed to The 238,000 apartments are inhabited according to specific specifications that they have not announced yet. God is Great, God is Great. I mean,

42:08 today we should have heard him say, for example, that someone whose salary is less than 3,000 pounds will live in which area? In the 238,000 apartments and start applying tomorrow so we can start moving you. He didn’t say anything, as evidence that he doesn’t want to, doesn’t want to include them. He will still see how much he will emigrate for and what he will do. But he was supposed to hasten two things. In my opinion, they were supposed to happen today: the million apartments, of which 300,000 are empty and 600 to 800,000 whose owners have many other apartments and many units and are sitting in them at a loss. These should have been returned to the

42:55 owner. Two: the able tenant who can live in something else. At that time, it was for only two years, not seven. Three. The one who couldn’t afford it could have reported today that his apartment is with us, but he leaves them living in this fear and bitterness. No, and the other category has been with him for more than seven years in exchange for the state providing him with support from the Long Live Egypt Fund, from the Sovereign Fund, from any fund in the world. The owner wants 1,000 pounds and he can pay 50, 70, 200 pounds to complete. He has 700. He can pay 800. He can complete it with 200. He covers these five points. We hoped to see them in the law, but unfortunately,

43:40 he did not respond so quickly. It is effective and any talk about it will not change anything. The issue is over and done with. The old rent is an old issue and it is over. Within seven years, there will be no more of it. The old law is over. The rent will now be transformed into a full floating rent, a full rent. The law does not favor the owner or the tenant. It is biased towards the owner and the tenant. It was supposed to separate the owners and the tenants. As for me, I see that it is extremely unjust. If you want to solve the society’s housing problem today, you can

44:27 liberate a million women today. A million women will solve the problem of a million families, apart from these 6 million tenants or owners. If the king took back a million apartments today and offered them for rent, you would have solved a million problems in society, just like them. I will not tell him to lay eggs or do as they are. Within a month or anything, the old king vacates the inhabited house and hands over a million Apartment If I were Egypt, here is the state, I am the state, the spirit of the state solves and wants, and there are 300,000 empty apartments that will be sold in the morning, their owners will put them up for rent or they have children

45:12 married far away, they will leave their apartments and come live in what with their father and mother in their apartment in these units as well, at the same time I have an empty apartment in a certain governorate and an apartment that they bring right, they bring it to the left, there are a million apartments that would be put up for rent and solve the housing problem. I think as a state, I have a crisis in housing about 8 to 10 million citizens, those who are married in a room with their mother and those who do not find a way like that, so I have solved the problem of a million citizens, but I have given them seven years to get these million apartments, like them, like the other five million, so I am not a state, my thinking is not the thinking of one person on a nest, I have a nest and I am thinking about it,

45:57 but I want to create apartments immediately, solve the housing problem, a million apartments, the most important thing immediately, the king benefited, I brought new residents They don't have apartments to live in, and the money was stolen and will be taxed, and the whole country will benefit, and the king will benefit, and the tenants among them will not be harmed. This is a group that will not be harmed, but who will say it to, and who will listen? Until we meet again. Peace be upon you and God's mercy and blessings. Keep doing 1000 likes, gentlemen who are on the broadcast now. Like, please. We will meet later. Yes.