ناصر: السيسي بيحضر لكارثة.. هيطرد ملايين المصريين من بيوتهم ويرميهم في الشارع!!

0:00 A lot of money, sir. Money that has no owner. Stolen money. The ministers’ inspection tours have actually begun for you, the poor citizen living in the two worlds. The ministers worked hard. They went to inspect the artificial lakes, the marina, and the resorts that you are definitely not allowed to approach. Finally, here are the posts as they are listed in front of you. The Minister of Housing inspects the C19 Bridge, the Heritage City, and the beach area in the New Alamein City. Whose minister, sir? Housing is taking the role of an investigation officer, God knows best. Those who came after him sat down to inspect, and of course the Minister of

0:45 Housing is also very active. Why is New Marina and the roads and entrances to Marina North Coast like this? These people, my friends, will eat and drink at our expense. They are residents at our expense. But the question now is, of course the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Information will hold artistic segments there. The Minister of Housing, forget about him. The Mazarine Compound and the Latin Quarter are Latino, Latino, Latino. Where are we and where are the Latins? Well, other than that, the Ministry of Information and the Ministry of Culture, I am telling you, will hold a huge media and artistic program that will continue, of course, from today until the end of September. There will be the biggest singers, male and female, drummers, songwriters, pimps, and

1:32 instrumentalists, all of them. But to be honest, the system, even while it is slowing down the people and their children around them in the pools of five-star hotels. At the expense of the people, he thinks of the people. Yes, he thinks of you. Are you surprised why he thinks of you, the poor, miserable, tired citizen, despite the exhaustion from the scorching summer sun of the world, despite all of this? But who are they thinking of? They think of Egypt. So what is the evidence that they are thinking about you? The first evidence I will give you now is how Mostafa Madbouly thinks about you. Madbouly is thinking about you and is going to mess around. He told you not to be afraid of the old rental law because there will be no eviction and we will take into account special cases. The subject is not called the old rental law. It is

2:20 called liberating the relationship between the landlord and the tenant. The experts confirmed to him that this subject is inevitable. Listen to Madbouly as he packs his bags and goes out to the world. Who is he saying? We are talking about the fact that this law has a transitional period upon which the relationship will be liberated. But this does not mean that there will be eviction. No one said at all that there will be eviction, but there is a liberation of the relationship and thus there will be another form existing between the landlord and the tenant. This is a very important point governed by the existing procedures and the most important organizational procedures. We, as a state, are moving to make available. During this same period, there will be alternatives for those we can call them, meaning they have special cases. This, thank God, is being achieved

3:07 through the housing programs that the Egyptian state is doing today and implementing on the ground, so that there will be priority for some special social cases that may not be Able to mean that it is within the framework of liberating the relationship, that it is able to pay the rental value, so that they have priority in some of the projects that the Egyptian state is implementing on the ground. All of this today is present in this matter, but what I emphasize does not mean that liberating the relationship and the end of the transitional period means that there will be an expulsion, but it is possible that the relationship has been liberalized and there remains a balanced relationship between the owner and the tenant, which we are talking about. However, the issue today is still present in Parliament, and we are completing the final touches in this matter. All that concerns us as a state is achieving balance once again in this matter. Certainly, the issue is completely complex, and we are talking about a law that began more than 60 years ago. This means that this is

3:54 something that is extremely difficult. I mean, if the matter today, I know it raises controversy and the words that you are saying may be said, but all the experts concerned with this matter have always said that it is impossible for the situation to continue as it was. Of course, the people, the tenants and the owners, are from our simple people, the great beauties. So they might get confused, of course, all this talk is dates, dates, dates, and the fate of millions of Egyptians until now, with this draft law or the liberalization of the relationship, these are not my words. The video I saw a while ago is of Khaled Abu Bakr. Listen to Khaled Abu Bakr. What are we talking about? This law has a transitional period based on which the relationship will be liberalized, but this does not mean that there will be expulsion. No one said at all that there

4:40 will be expulsion, but there are quarantines and the owners, of course, are our simple people, the great beauties. So they might get confused. There will be no expulsion. I did not understand it. The truth came to me. I mean, first, they brought me all the newspapers that quoted the Prime Minister, but when I heard the word like this, I myself got confused. Naturally, according to the proposed draft law, there will be expulsion. I am saying the opposite of what the Prime Minister says, there will be expulsion. What will we do? How will we compensate them? We are talking about all these topics, but I am speaking from a distance according to the draft law that the government presented after the transitional period has passed. The Prime Minister The ministers say who said there will be an eviction? No, there will be an eviction. I mean, if I understand correctly, or you have amended the articles of the proposed law and introduced them in a different form than the

5:25 form that was presented to the media. Gentlemen, we are in great danger. We are in great danger. After seven years, according to our legal reading of the draft law submitted by the government, the tenants will be evicted from their places. What the Prime Minister said today, frankly, has caused confusion for me. If this scenario continues and the draft law is passed and becomes law and is published and implemented, God willing, it will be implemented after seven years. By God Almighty, it will not be a crime against our people. This is not just my words. It is true. After seven years, the person living in an apartment will leave it. Will they be compensated? How, why, for how much, and where? This is a new chapter, but the owner now has the right to evict him. Even the ministers’ spokesman admitted that this will be the fate

6:11 after he was pressured by Amal al-Din Hussein. Listen to me, there is no other sentence or meaning in the draft law submitted except immediate eviction in accordance with the law that In the language we call it the degree of eviction of the tenant and after that God will solve it and he will go and see what the state will give him or he will agree or not agree with the owner. I mean I think I understand your point of view, but I think if you go back to the text, the text is the text as I remember, and if I am sure if you also went back to it, the text was referring in this point specifically to the case of a dispute, then it is possible that the residence will be vacated, but the point that the Prime Minister was aiming for me today is that he is referring to the other case, that in the event of a dispute, therefore, the point that His Excellency was trying to clarify is that eviction is not necessarily a matter of... Well, Mr. Emad El- Din Hussein, Editor-in-Chief of Grit Shwaya, wants to

6:56 speak to you. Good evening, Mr. Counselor. Good evening, sir. I will tell you the wording that I understood from the words of the Prime Minister and what I understood from reading the text of the draft legal resolution that is in the House of Representatives now, is that at the end of the seventh year after the approval, if the law is approved In the wording therein, the rental relationship between the owner and the tenant will end completely by its expiration or liberation, according to the expression you used, or the colloquial language, the end of the relationship, or eviction in the second language, and it may end immediately, one day after the issuance of the law, in the event that there is an apartment for that tenant, or the apartment is closed for a period, or the residential unit for a period of one year, in these three cases: the passage of a closed year, the presence of a residential unit, or seven years for those who do not have two cases. In both cases, the relationship ends immediately, and the state will undertake some assistance for the needy. Is it possible for the owner and tenant to agree on a new rental relationship in accordance with the new law, the

7:43 new rental law? Is this wording correct? Of course, I mean, sir, the wording is as you indicated, there are some cases, I mean, there are some cases that are possible, of course, I mean, we are still talking about the draft law being discussed, but the cases that you indicated, the residence may actually be vacated, but I am here explaining or trying to clarify the point that the Prime Minister indicated. Today specifically, will the eviction be inevitable? His Excellency indicated that the goal is to liberate the relationship. Well, how do we answer this question, sir, according to the draft law? Will the eviction be inevitable or not, by force of law or without force of law? No, eviction, sir, in the event of an agreement, of course, meaning after the relationship is liberated. And in the event of an agreement on a new one, no, Your Excellency the Counselor, the simple question is the end of the relationship. That is, after seven years, the relationship ends immediately between the owner and the tenant, and the owner has the right to leave. We will not say evict the tenant, unless an agreement is reached. He woke up

8:29 to the drafting of a new contract. The wording is correct. The wording or explanation that you explained is correct. It is correct. It is correct. It is not correct. I mean, why are we denying it? Why are we denying it? This is the same thing that the tenants understood when they said, “Why is the state fighting us and wants to create strife in the country?” We read this. Here are the people’s links. Madbouly’s words are contradictory. Where is there no eviction, where was the relationship liberated, and where is the news that they are telling him? It is impossible for the situation to continue at today's price. Take this. God is sufficient for us, and He is the best Disposer of affairs. They do not understand what they are saying exactly. The country is in one day of prices and living in comfort, and there are people who did not get their rights from the old houses. They were removed from the ring road, and the people who lost their fruits

9:16 because they did not have the means due to the high cost of living. Do they know how to pay what they are owed? We are asking what you will do to us, O government? After seven years of loss, we do not sleep, and the illness has worsened on me. This is Fatima's thing, and my children's psychology is zero. What is required of them is to protect the country and love her, and she is humiliating them. They see the woe and humiliation. Her intention is work so that they can help the house and learn, and also expulsion. You will make us homeless. God is sufficient for us, and He is the best Disposer of affairs. Fear the day when you will return to God. You will lie and believe it. The country is in debt, and we are the ones who pay the debts. God be upon you, Hajja Fatima. By God, God will protect you. If the ministers and their families go to rule us from their summer headquarters in the worlds, take a loan. And also a

10:04 loan, and a lot of money, and a lot of chatter, and a compensation for the days of hardship and suffering, and pay, oh people, may God relieve us of your kind and take revenge on your stupidity, Mr. Prime Minister, and the honorable ministers, and the honorable families and relatives of the honorable ministers, all wishes for a happy summer vacation, and we are very, very sorry for spoiling your enjoyment of the happy vacation in the new worlds, the tenants’ representatives say that the channels hostile to Egypt are talking about the government law, have you asked yourselves for a moment, who opened this door for them,

10:50 Muhammad, who says we will not remain silent about our expulsion and displacement, the coming anger will be severe on everyone, just wait, your name is, go, you just wait, no, it’s okay, you are warning that you will not remain silent, I mean, no, the government that pampers the world told you a clear threat, we will not allow you to cause disturbances, any disturbances, oh you poor, squabbling people, an official, an official threat, madam, owner of this account, listen to me, listen to me, the state It will not allow

11:36 any social unrest that may result from the application of the old rent law. Yes, it is official. Does anyone have anything to say? The state will not allow any social unrest that may result. There is nothing left. I mean, it is finished. They arrested the man who speaks on your behalf.