Brief Summary
The speaker addresses the government's decision to release the strategic defense review outside of Parliament, which is seen as a sign of disrespect towards the House and its members. The speaker emphasizes the importance of keeping Parliament informed and expresses concern that industry representatives and journalists were given access to the review before Members of Parliament.
- Government published strategic defense review outside of Parliament.
- Industry representatives and journalists were given access to the review before Members of Parliament.
- Speaker expresses concern over disregard for Parliament and its members.
Sir Lindsay Hoyle's Opening Statement
The speaker begins by expressing his disappointment with the government's decision to publish the strategic defense review outside of Parliament. He views this as a sign of disrespect towards the House and its members, particularly those on the back benches. He recalls how ministers, when in opposition, were quick to criticize similar actions by the previous government, highlighting the hypocrisy. The speaker emphasizes the importance of Parliament being informed first and hopes this will not happen again.
Lucy Powell's Response
Lucy Powell responds by referencing a previous urgent question on a similar matter and reiterates the government's commitment to keeping Parliament informed. She states her satisfaction that the government is regularly updating the House.
Sir Lindsay Hoyle's Rebuttal
The speaker expresses his disagreement with Lucy Powell's satisfaction, emphasizing that backbenchers should be the first to hear important information. He stresses the importance of discussing these matters in the House.
Lucy Powell's Explanation
Lucy Powell mentions that a statement will be made this afternoon by the descent secretary. She also points out the importance of the second reading debate and the number of speakers scheduled to participate, highlighting the need to balance urgent questions with other important business.
Sir Lindsay Hoyle on Urgent Questions
The speaker clarifies that the reason for granting two urgent questions is because the strategic defense review was not initially presented to the House. He suggests that if it had been, there would be no pressure on time.
James Cartlidge's Concerns
James Cartlidge raises a serious concern that representatives of industry were allowed to see the strategic defense review at 10:30 AM. He emphasizes that this is a multi-billion pound industry and the information is highly market-sensitive. He expresses his disappointment that industry representatives and journalists were given access before Members of Parliament and the Select Committee of Defense.
Sir Lindsay Hoyle's Disappointment
The speaker echoes James Cartlidge's disappointment, stating that something has gone fundamentally wrong. He believes the House needs answers and suggests the leader should investigate and report back. He is particularly concerned that journalists and defense industry personnel with a vested interest were informed before MPs.
