RAHASIA dibalik Perang Iran vs Israel!!

0:03 [Music] The military conflict that broke out over 12 days in June 2025 was not a surprise without warning. Rather, it is the accumulation of ideological tensions, power struggles, and power struggles that have been simmering for more than 7 decades. To understand how we got to this point with the missile strikes on Tel Afif and Iran's nuclear facilities being destroyed by a foreign coalition, we must go back to a time when relations between the two countries were built on trust and mutual interests. In 1948 when Israel

0:51 declared its independence, Iran was one of the few countries in the region that never openly opposed it. Behind the scenes there is a very close network of cooperation between Tehran and Tel Afif. Driven by fear of Arab power and aligned geopolitical interests. But that chapter came to a drastic end in 1979 when Iran's Islamic revolution overthrew the Shah and replaced him with a regime that made Israel its ideological enemy. From there a conflict does not develop linearly. On the contrary, it is filled with paradoxes and secret maneuvers. Iran faced weapons from Israel during the war with Iraq. Israel is exploiting

1:37 regional conflicts to strategically isolate Iran . The relationship between the two countries changed from cooperation to confrontation, from diplomacy to shadow war. Now with high-precision weapons, long-range missiles and a world that continues to be lulled by global uncertainty. The Israeli conflict has entered a new, far more dangerous phase. But is this really the beginning and the end or just a continuation of the old scenario repeating itself in a more destructive way? Iran and Israel's relationship has not always been filled with conflict. In fact, in the early decades of Israel's founding, the two formed one of the most unusual alliances in the Middle East. Amidst political pressure from the Arab world that rejects Israel's legitimacy, Iran has chosen a different path by

2:23 cooperating. Under the rule of Sheikh Muhammad Reza Pahlafi, Iran pursued a pragmatic and balanced foreign policy. The Shah saw Israel not as an enemy, but as a strategic partner that could help secure Iran's position in the region. On the other hand, Israel, which is surrounded by Arab countries, needs non-Arab allies to survive and expand its influence. This is the meeting point of interests that gives birth to intense secret collaboration. This strategy is known as the Alya peripheral doctrine, which was initiated by David Ben Guion, Israel's first Prime Minister. This doctrine aims to build a coalition with peripheral countries of the Arab world such as Iran, Türkiye, and Ethiopia to balance the power of the Arab Alliance. In this context, Iran is an ideal ally, having a

3:12 secular and stable state structure. This collaboration is not just symbolic behind the scenes. Israel and Iran's relations involve intelligence exchanges, military training, and joint economic projects. Iran consistently supplied oil to Israel even during the 1973 West Dutch Arab oil embargo. In return, Israel provided irrigation and agricultural technology and access to military resources. Mossat and Safak, Israeli and Iranian intelligence agencies, even maintain very close relations, including monitoring the activities of communist and radical groups in their regions. Several now-declassified documents show that the two agencies conducted joint operations to monitor

3:58 Soviet influence in the Middle East. In addition, Iran has an interest in maintaining good relations with Israel due to its position as a non-Arab country surrounded by potentially hostile states. In some cases, Iran acts as a secret channel for Israeli communications to several Muslim countries with which it has no formal relations. However, this cooperation was not popular among the Iranian people. Open support for Israel would create domestic opposition. Especially after the emergence of the Islamist movement which began to oppose foreign domination and the Shah's foreign policy. Therefore, this relationship has always been kept in the corridor of secrecy and is only known to elite military and diplomatic circles. However, this cooperation is fundamentally rooted in a shared belief that regional stability can be achieved if both parties are able to control the influence of

4:47 revolutionary Arab states. For 3 decades, this relationship continued in silence until it was finally destroyed by the wave of the Iranian Islamic revolution which completely changed the political orientation in Iran. 1979 marked a turning point in Iran-Israel relations. A wave of revolution overthrew Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi and abolished the long-standing monarchical system. In an instant, Iran transformed from a pro-Western secular state into an Islamic republic led by Ayatollah Omri, a revolutionary cleric with a sharply anti-imperialist ideology for Israel. This change is not just a change of government. Iran, once a secret ally, has now become one of its most vocal ideological enemies. In the rhetoric of the commentators Israel is not just a

5:36 foreign entity, but an extension of US domination that must be destroyed. Israel is a cancerous tumor that must be removed from the body of Muslims. This is one of the quotes that later became part of Iran's official narrative. The severance of diplomatic relations took place immediately after the revolution. The Israeli embassy in Tehran was taken over and handed over to the Palestinian liberation organization. All forms of military, intelligence and economic cooperation were stopped. Israel is now positioned alongside the arch-enemies of the American revolution and the old colonial powers. As with many geopolitical conflicts, reality does not always match the rhetoric. When Iran was involved in the brutal and prolonged Iran-Iraq war from 1980, the situation became much more complex. In a tight spot, Ireland sought a

6:25 way to defend itself and secretly offered Israel military aid through unofficial channels . This channel later became known as Iran contra Ver. According to journalist Ronan Burkman, Israel views Sardem Hussein and the Bahat regime of Iraq as a greater threat than the Islamic Iraqi regime of Iran. So with geopolitical calculations, Israel supplies weapons to Iran through intermediaries and secret contracts including bullets, light weapons, and military spare parts . This was done with the knowledge of the United States, which was also involved in the arms transaction to free the United States' cadres in Lebanon. Paradoxically, although officially Iran continues to spout anti-Israel rhetoric, this pragmatic relationship does not last long behind the scenes. There is no formal agreement,

7:11 but the reality on the battlefield forces both sides to play in a grey area. However, this cooperation is temporary. After the war ended and Iran managed to survive, anti- Israel rhetoric was reinforced again. The influence of the Iranian revolution spread throughout the Middle East. Inspiring Islamist groups to fight against Western powers and their allies. Israel has become a symbol of colonialism and tyranny in the narrative promoted by Tehran. During this period, Iran also began to establish relations with various anti-Israel militant groups, including Hizbul in Lebanon. This group will later become an extension of Iran in dealing with Israel without having to be directly involved in open conflict. Although this era started with all official relations in it there was a hidden chapter of cooperation. A shadow that shows that conflict is not always just a matter of ideology

8:00 , but there is a gray area, where strategies and interests can meet even among sworn enemies. But often the space for compromise becomes increasingly narrow. Harsh rhetoric on both sides is becoming increasingly dominant. And in the next decade, Israel and Iran's relationship would shift from diplomatic tensions to an indirect war involving proxy actors and covert operations. After the end of the Iran-Iraq war in 1988, Iran was no longer on the defensive, but began to consolidate its power. The revolution has survived a major test and now Tehran is projecting its influence abroad. For Israel, this is the beginning of a new form of threat, not in the form of direct invasion but

8:46 through intermediary wars or proxy wars. An began to build a network of alliances with militant groups that had a common goal of opposing Israel and Western influence and this gave birth to what was known as the axis of resistance or ais of resistance consisting of Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and Shiite groups in Iraq. All receive financial support for training and weapons from Iran. For Israel this is a nightmare that is slowly becoming a reality. War is no longer at the country's borders, but enters the city via rockets launched from Gaza or Lebanon. Iran, although not directly involved, has managed to create constant pressure on Israel without the risk of open war. The peak occurred in 2006 when a 34- day war erupted between Israel and

9:31 Hezbollah. The Lebanon-based militant group managed to hold off Israeli attacks and even undermined the confidence of the Israeli military, which had long been known for its superiority. This is evidence of Iran's effective strategy and that the conflict now has a new, much more complex dimension. In the same decade, the Iranian nuclear issue also began to surface even though Iran's nuclear program began during the Shah's era with Western assistance. After the revolution, this program continued independently and behind closed doors. The international community, especially Israel and America, began to worry that the goal of this program was not just energy , but also weapons of mass destruction. Israel sees the potential for nuclear weapons in Iran as an existential threat. In Israel's security doctrine , no country in the region should have nuclear capabilities other than them. Therefore, various

10:19 forms of pressure, both diplomatic, economic and intelligence, have been increased to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions. At the same time, Iran expanded its military reach through the development of ballistic missiles and the spread of revolutionary ideology to neighboring countries. Any group that feels oppressed by the West or Israel has the potential to become part of Iran's orbit of influence. In this context, military strength is not only measured by the number of tanks and planes, but by the extent of their influence through militia groups and intelligence networks. This period was a time when Israel and Iq rarely attacked directly. But tensions continue to rise behind the scenes as both sides prepare for the worst-case scenario while he watches the conflict evolve from

11:04 conventional to asymmetrical from country to country to country to armed group. Entering the 2010s, the conflict between Iran and Israel entered a hidden phase. But no less dangerous. Direct confrontation was almost non-existent. But attack after attack continues to take place in cyberspace. Tehran streets and underground nuclear facilities. This is the era of shadow war. Deadly silence and never really officially acknowledged . One of the key points was the stock snat cyber attack in 2010. This highly complex computer virus was designed to attack centrifuges at Iran's nuclear facility in Natans, slowing the country's ability to enrich uranium. Although never

11:51 publicly acknowledged, many analyses have concluded that this attack was the result of cooperation between the United States and Israel. Stoknet is not only a technical operation, but also a symbol of the changing battlefield. In this era, military strength is not only measured by tanks or fighter jets, but also by the ability to destroy enemy infrastructure without setting foot on the battlefield. After Stocknet, cyber attacks against Iran intensified. Industrial control systems, communications networks, even financial institutions are targets. In retaliation, Iran also began developing its cyber capabilities to attack water systems, electricity, and technology companies in Israel and its allies. The world is witnessing the emergence of a new conflict zone that is bulletless,

12:38 but has a very real impact. But cber is only one side of the shadow war. This is the real assassination operation against Iranian nuclear scientists that began to occur systematically between 2010 and 2020. At least five scientists were killed in incidents believed to be mosak operations. It culminated in 2022 when Mohsin Fahrizade, a central figure in Iran's nuclear weapons program, was assassinated near Tehran in a highly sophisticated and well-planned operation. Iran attacked Israel directly. Although Israel maintains diplomatic discretion, public reaction in Iran is mixed. Some condemned it, some considered it evidence of internal weakness, and others saw Fakrizali as a martyr in the

13:25 struggle to defend national sovereignty. In response, Iran did not remain silent. Increase logistical and weapons support to Hezbollah and accelerate the development of high-precision ballistic missiles. These missiles are not only capable of reaching Israel, but are also equipped with navigation technology that increases the accuracy of attacks. On the other hand, Israel has increased intelligence activities in Iraq and Syria, targeting Iranian weapons depots and supply lines for its proxies. This era is full of unannounced escalations. The attack was unclaimed, the residence was not explained, and the sabotage was considered an industrial accident. But for those who follow the flow, everything points in one direction. Both countries are preparing for the possibility of open war. The world remains to be filled with endless tension. A

14:11 big spark finally ignited a conflict that had been suppressed for too long. That's what happened in June 2025 and it all started with a game behind the curtain that had been going on for over a decade. On June 13, 2025, the world woke up to news that had only been speculation until now. Israel openly launched air strikes on strategic facilities in Iran. No more shadow wars, no more intermediaries. For the first time in history these two regional powers were involved in a direct conflict that exploded quickly and deadly. The main targets of the Israeli attack were three Iranian nuclear facilities, Ford, Nathans, and Isfahat. The attacks were carried out with high speed and coordination supported by sophisticated technology and

14:57 precise intelligence information. But what was most surprising was not the attack, but Iran's swift response, which was far stronger than many analysts had predicted. Iran not only survived, but also brought. Ballistic missiles and armed drones began raining down on Israeli territory. Major cities such as Tel Afif and Haifa suffered major damage. These attacks killed 28 Israeli civilians and crippled energy infrastructure in several strategic areas. For the international community, this retaliatory attack is a signal that Iran has entered a new era of military capability. But what makes this conflict more complex is the direct involvement of the United States. President Donald Trump, who returned to office after a controversial 2024 election, ordered additional strikes on Iranian territory targeting military and nuclear facilities. The United States has stated that

15:45 its goal is to completely destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities. Lim was then questioned by many parties due to the lack of concrete evidence. The American attack widened the conflict and increased international tensions. Russia, China and several European countries called for immediate implementation of the weapons. Meanwhile the Middle East region is on the verge of a massive regional war within Iran. The response to this attack reflects the internal political fabric of the country. The hard-core girl group praised the military response as proof of the strength of the Islamic republic. Meanwhile, performance groups warned that the backlash would only worsen international isolation. But one thing that is clear is that Iranians, including those who regularly criticize the government, are showing national solidarity in the face of foreign attacks on Israel. Civilians felt the

16:31 direct impact of the brutal attacks. Tensions are running high and support for the government's military action is beginning to split. Some blamed Merita for triggering the escalation. While others demand tougher action against Iran. For 12 days the world watched two regional powers slam into each other in a war that defied all predictions. Attack after attack occurs in the air and in cyberspace. Sabotage operations, power outages and cyber attacks on banks and hospitals are part of the modern battlefield. The weapons announced on June 24, 2025 ended 12 open engagements between Iran and Israel. But behind the silence of the guns, the world is entering a tense phase of strategic uncertainty. Because even though the rockets have stopped being fired, the impact of this conflict continues to roll out

17:18 across various military, diplomatic, economic and psychological fronts. One of the biggest impacts is on the perception of Iran's power. For the first time, the international public witnessed Iran being able to retaliate against military attacks from two major powers, Israel and the United States. Openly, Iran's ability to target vital areas in Israel even when under intense pressure is changing the way the world views regional stability. On the other hand, Israel is experiencing an internal crisis. While those who entered the territory showed that the defense system was not completely immune. Civil society is beginning to question whether the preventive strike strategy actually enhances national security and instead accelerates the danger. This conflict also exposed Israel's strategic dependence on the United States. Although

18:03 Israel's military might is highly advanced, direct intervention from Washington is a key element in expanding the offensive and putting pressure on Iran. Israeli historian Mark Volvov even stated that this conflict made it clear that political, military and financial support from the United States was still the main foundation of Israel's strength in facing regional enemies. But the results of the military offensive itself are also questionable. Although Washington stated that Iran's nuclear facilities had been completely destroyed. The legend report actually shows that Iran's major infrastructure can still be restored. Even Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Arag, emphasized that Iran is no longer interested in continuing nuclear negotiations with the West. In conditions like this, the conflict also gave rise to a strong reaction from the international community. The European Union called for an

18:49 investigation into violations of the laws of war. Meanwhile, the UN warned that this situation could trigger a domino effect in other regions, including increased tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and a potential spike in global oil prices . It doesn't matter that the Palestinian region is again in turmoil at almost the same time as the Iran-Israel conflict. More than 680 people have been killed in Gaza as a result of Israel's military escalation. This shows that regional conflicts cannot be seen in isolation, but rather as part of a wider and interconnected network of conflicts . The arrival of the conflict is also seen in the form of new sanctions imposed by the United States against Iran. This move makes it clear that even though the guns have fallen silent, the economic and diplomatic war continues at no less intensity. The conflict between Iran and Israel in June 2025 left

19:38 more questions than answers. Although the arms embargo has been announced, there is no sign that the root of the problem has been touched, let alone resolved. Iran's Muk remains a mystery. Armed proxies are still active. Economic and political pressure continues to increase on both sides. In the diplomatic space, negotiations continue to see the United States impose additional sanctions. Closing the door to dialogue and Israel began to increase patrols on its borders. All are moving towards the same Yalus, namely in anticipation of the possibility of the next escalation, namely the third world war. What is more worrying is that the international public is starting to get used to this conflict. When the world is no longer shocked by the explosion of the Avif or Sabutalse ralil in Natans, the conflict itself begins to lose its urgency in the eyes of the world and that is where the danger lies

20:24 because it is precisely in silence and indifference that the conflict can develop in a more serious direction. This is only the beginning of a new, more destructive chapter or there is still a chance to break out of the cycle of revenge that has been passed down from generation to generation. Nobody knows for sure. But one thing is clear, history has not finished writing the story between Iran and Israel.