محاضرة (مصادر التشريع وأثره في وحدة الأمة) لمعالي الشيخ ⁧‫صالح آل الشيخ

0:26 and the development of the mosque. It has been stolen by many of the members of the mosque. This is a brief introduction to those who will manage this blessed mosque. We welcome you all and thank you for this meeting which is attended by many thinkers, scholars, and intellectuals. And a number of brothers and sisters are also joining us. We ask Allah Almighty to help the two honorable servants of the Prophet in the service of Islam and Muslims. And may this blessed country benefit the leadership, government, and people in serving Islam and Muslims And may the words of our blessed sheikh be a successful and successful message And may he make you blessed wherever he is And I leave you with this admonition And

1:12 peace be upon you and the mercy of Allah and His blessings In the name of Allah, the Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful Indeed, praise is to Allah, we praise Him, we ask His help, and we ask His forgiveness Surah Al-Fatihah This festival

2:22 became a beautiful symbol in the body of the Arab culture and its radiations have spread to the ends of the universe. Cultures have merged through it and ideas have met in it and the circle of dialogue has expanded from it. And from what this festival has shown and has been presented This noble care for the servants of the two sacred harems King Salman bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud May Allah protect him The leader of knowledge and scholars And a friend of intellectuals And a watcher of thought and history May

3:09 Allah protect him and care for him Surah Al-Fatihah The land of glory, the land of glory, the symbol of Islam and faith, and the protector of the holy Muslim. And for those who are present at this festival, we offer our gratitude and gratitude to the representatives of the Ministry of National Security, the person named

3:54 after her minister, and the members of his deputy, and all the workers, with them in the committees of this festival and its activities and the participants with them from other parties. Dear brothers, our meeting this evening is distinguished by its subject, whether it is the sources of legislation and its impact on the unity of the nation, how not? And these sources, the first of which is the Qur'an and the Sunnah, are the university It is the only university for people, in belief, in methodology, in thought, and in behavior. And we will know through our meeting tonight how this effect is and when

4:45 this effect will be effective. In a hadith that many of our lecturers know, it is a hadith that is widely known in the fields of knowledge, knowledge, and the view of the scholar in the fields of knowledge and knowledge. Sheikh Saleh bin Abdul Aziz said to the Sheikh: A scholar who received knowledge from the great scholars of his country, Saudi Arabia, and he was not satisfied with that. He set out in the wider space of the universe and studied and was awarded by many scholars of the Islamic world.

5:30 foreign Al-Fatiha. وظف هذه العلاقة لخدمة دينه ووطنه سواء من خلال عمله الرسمي أو العلمي لن أتحدث

6:19 عن صالح آل الشيخ المسؤول ورجل الدولة ولن أتحدث عن صالح آل الشيخ الإنسان الفقيه المقاصدي Surah Al-Fatihah or some of us were asked to do so for his administrative duties and

7:05 responsibilities. I welcome you all with the name of the great scholar, Saliha bin Abdulaziz bin Muhammad bin Ibrahim Al-Sheikh, in his talk tonight about the sources of legislation and its impact on the unity of the nation. There will be interventions and questions, depending on the time. And according to the priority of its arrival to this platform, I leave you with me, Sheikh Saleh. Let's go with me. In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds. And I bear witness that there is no god but Allah, and there is no partner for Him, and He is the true and clear King. And I bear witness that Muhammad is a servant of Allah and His Messenger. May

7:53 Allah bless him and his family and companions. And he has received a lot of peace and blessings. As-salamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu. I thank the Ministry of National Security

8:42 as well as the Minister, the MPs and all the brothers who have prepared for these cultural and intellectual activities in the National National Heritage Festival and Culture in its 32nd and 30th years. I also want to thank my brother, my colleague and my friend, the Honorable Dr. Tawfiq Ibn Abdulaziz Al-Sidiri, His generosity with these words, if we could reach them, we would all be students of knowledge and we would be searching for the truth and we would be longing for the good of the Ummah. So we ask Allah to forgive us our

9:28 sins and to help us and to keep us from being blinded by speech and deeds. As I asked him, may Allah Almighty, to grant the owner of the two sacred places and the leader of his covenant, Al-Amin, the best reward and what they have done for the sake of Islam, Muslims, the strength of this nation and the benefit of its servants. Dear brothers, this lecture is entitled: "The sources of legislation and its impact on the unity of the nation." It is my choice, I was

10:14 asked to choose three topics, three titles, and I chose this title. And when I chose it, I didn't know where the direction would be. But it includes two of my two missions that I love. The first mission is the sources of legislation, and the second mission is the unity of the nation. The sources of legislation are concerned with Every scholar of knowledge and every jurist and every researcher of jurisprudence and its origins Because the sources of legislation are the reference that the judgment will be based on for

11:02 jurists and for the people of religion in what people differ in matters The second premise is the unity of the nation The unity of the nation is a great, noble and sincere demand for Allah and His Messenger and for his book and for the Muslim nation and for their nation, he asks for this unity. Because good is united and power is united, and division is weak and the enemy is strong. So the two individuals are important. But where are we going to show this subject? Will we take it? and we will

11:52 look into the sources of the legislation and we will count them and the evidence that is agreed upon and the different evidence and the sects that are in it and what they agreed upon and what they disagreed upon and we will look into the evidence of the Qur'an and the evidence of the Sunnah and how the evidence is to the end or we will go to the presentation of the sources of the legislation in general and we take the result, the result, the evidence from it as an argument. We assume that the sources of Islamic legislation are acceptable. The recipient who hears this does

12:41 not argue that the Qur'an is an argument. Sunnah is an argument, and the consensus is an argument, and the measurement is an argument in one direction or another. We assume acceptance, although there is a extremist scientific thought, and it exists, that says the Qur'an is not an argument, nor is the Sunnah an argument, nor is the consensus an argument, etc. So we assume a theoretical assumption that we will deal with those who care about the revolution of the nation and the unity of the nation from a religious point of view. There are those who look at unity from a

13:30 linguistic point of view. Those who look at the unity of the nation from a national point of view. The Arab nation or other nations. Some of them assume that the unity of the nation is based on the scientific thinking, the comprehensive scientific thinking. There are many opinions. The unity of the nation and the sources of legislation. We show it at the beginning with a jaz that the relationship between the sources of legislation and the unity of the nation is a jurisprudential relationship. Because the unity of the nation was one of the reasons for its existence, the unity of the method of

14:18 acceptance and the unity of the evidence of legislation. Therefore, If there is a position of argumentation in the present report, the view of what is around you, the view of the universe, the view of human interaction with man, the view of human interaction with the consent, with the opponent, with his state, the interaction with the universe, with the environment, what is the reference in determining the relationship of man with what is around him from a holistic point of view? The reference in this proposal is the sources of the legislations, meaning the Qur'an, the Sunnah, the consensus, the measures, the legal standards

15:08 and the purposes of the complete Sharia. Therefore, the nation rose when it rose and united when it was was consistent with the reference in the method of acceptance and in the sources of legislation. That is, the argument in the sources of legislation that the Ummah has established on the difference in its methods. It has established in the Qur'an and the Sunnah was based on some differences and the consensus was based on some differences and the measurement was based on some differences and

15:55 the comparison was based on some differences in some of its pictures and some issues and it was based on many rules especially the general rules and this recommendation was organized on To have a limited difference in the Ummah Until the first century ended and the second century ended The discussion on the subject of the protest increased These are the references on how to protest Then many of the jurisprudential details appeared in the type of the protest The gap increased as there was a distance from

16:40 the method of acceptance The clear thing in the first Hijri century is that the caliphate increased and there was a search in the topics around it. Therefore, the divisions increased, the philosophical approaches increased, the speech approaches increased, the authoritarian schools increased, the directions of the government increased, and the countries increased to the extent that the nation was weakened by that. In our present time, there is no doubt that The situation of the nation in its division is not to be envied for it is in the most severe cases of its weakness in what has passed And we do not say that it was in a previous

17:29 period It was weaker and now it has become stronger It is not like that Now it is weaker than it is, why? Because the required unity The required unity of the nation is now being hit hard by the proposal of the new major concepts which are limited to the general Masonic thought and its deviations in partial and comprehensive scientific knowledge. Likewise, the difference between religion and culture, the authority of religion and the layers of culture, and

18:19 that there is no relationship between religion and culture, and there is no relationship between religion and the state, and there is no relationship between religion and values, and there is no relationship between religion and people's behavior. The economic distance, and the effect of this economic distance in the formation of the cultural distance and the world is a great example of that, as we are The world's control, the idea of the world as a basis, its economic and cultural idea is special. Therefore, when we talk about the unity of the nation, we talk about a very difficult

19:08 matter, in fact, and the challenge in it is very great. Rather, the nation now wants to be divided into two parts, unless it meets its worldly interests with the concept of partial secularism and the concept of secularism of the people. What does partial secularism mean? Secularism on two levels. Partial secularism means separating religion from the state. with the concept of religion has nothing to do with the state. What is the

19:57 state? The state is a government, land, people, legislation. The relationship between these things has nothing to do with religion. Therefore, the nation cannot be unified from a religious point of view. Why? Because the current idea must be that the nation enter the world and go away from its cultural or special features and there is a very strong relationship between the scientific subject and the special subject and the subject of the world is the subject of the special subject the second type of the world from

20:43 the scientific is the comprehensive scientific the comprehensive scientific means the separation of man from religion by all man meaning its connection to its values, its culture, its thought, its way of dealing with itself, and its interactions with those around it. So the comprehensive scientific and the world that is currently being proposed is a negative for controlling or for reference or for the method of receiving, meaning there is no reference for The sources of legislation remain in the circle of scholars in their religious

21:34 research in what they discuss and write and discuss in universities, but there should be no interruption between this method, the method of receiving the Lord, and the life of people. Therefore, the battle, brothers and sisters, today is a great battle as the most intense in history. The most intense battle in history between Islam and other ideas is at this time in the world. And this great battle is a battle based on philosophy. Then it came down from the philosophy of religion and humanity to the political

22:22 circles and the general idea is Masonic. Because the Masons are one of the first to establish a system for people to have their own system. The general secularism by separating religion from the state, which they stated in their books and their recommendations. And the partial secularism by separating religion from the state and the comprehensive secularism by distancing itself from values. Therefore, every relationship between distancing the Sharia from the

23:08 reality of life is a Masonic, secular idea that aims to The absence of religion in people's lives Are they enemies of religion for the sake of religion? Or because they are convinced that there is no justice for people in religion? And there are Arabs who support that And he says that man can be with man alone and his own nation One Arab scientist, one of the intellectual Arab scientists He says that people can be one nation If there wasn't the Qur'an, Sunnah and Prophets And the Qur'an says

23:55 that it has guided us to that Although the Qur'an says that it is not a proof or proof But the Qur'an says that it has guided you to that In its saying: "People were one nation, so Allah sent the prophets, the warners and the warners." People were one thing, but the Prophets came and separated them And this idea is present now that people can be one nation but the enemy of the unity of man is religions and they give examples not only in the religion of Islam they give examples in Judaism in some of its associations and

24:43 organizations and also in Christianity in some of its associations and churches and in Islam Here, if the West speaks about Islam contrary to its Western idea or to its comprehensive scientific idea, then it comes and says that Islam is in the Salafi school. And the Salafi school includes all schools which says that the source of the legislation is the book which we should refer to to determine the relationship of the human being with himself, with those around him, with his

25:32 country, with the other human being The source of the legislation is the Qur'an, the Sunnah, the consensus, the rules and the standards Those who need these sources consider it a Salafi school The non-Selafi school that says that the Qur'an is discussed with reason, it is an argument but it is discussed with reason, the Sunnah is an argument but it is discussed with reason, we accept it and we ignore it, the Qur'an we accept it and we ignore it, and therefore they mention a lot of criticism of the heritage, criticism of the heritage, criticism of the heritage in the systems of the modernization. The modernization is part or I mean, foreign

26:42 in the Western concept and the Western philosophical studies, whether in universities or political philosophers or religious philosophers, if they say the Salafi, they do not care about it We don't understand Salafiyah Salafiyah means those who say that we are going back to the origins of the Salaf in the four imams in the origins of the imams in the sources of the legislations which are the Quran, Sunnah, Al-Ijma' and Al-Qiyas, the words of the Companions, the rules of the whole and the general purposes, etc. Not entering the mind In this school, he made them look at it as Salafi So the

27:29 most severe enemy of the schools of Hadath is the Salafi with the general concept But if we want to take another picture, the other schools that separate from the school It is separated from the school of glorifying the sources of legislation to criticizing the sources of legislation These schools are being humiliated and different schools are being called by different names according to the existing terms Therefore, the search for the

28:16 unity of the nation is a very difficult search Nations unite in language, in the university of language, in the university of the region, in the university of history, in the university of religion, and in all kinds of fields. But the Muslim nation is impossible to unite in the present context. Why? First, because we are facing a huge and difficult question, which is how to unite? And the second difficult question is what are the elements of this union?

29:06 The third question is also difficult. Is the nation in its view of some of them united or different? If we start with the third question, is the nation in its view of some of them united or different? You always look at those who do not survive the battle, because he thinks that the people of the people are united. This leads to the purification of the line and the release of the truth. This is not the case. It is the

29:52 same if the atmosphere is different from this atmosphere, and the power is different from this power, and the reality is different from this reality. and international societies without this view. But with the control of modernity, the world, the secularism, and the Masonicism in their general goals, it is difficult to say that the division of scholars and the beating of some of them for others in search of the truth leads to a unity in the future. The future is headed in one direction, in

30:40 my opinion. This word is difficult to say. But it is headed, I mean, in the world, not specifically in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The world, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has its own specialties, God willing, and its own preservatives. But as a nation, we are searching for the nation, not for the internal search. It is very difficult. Why? Because the view is now economical at the first level and culture follows. Therefore, it is not a vision to unify culture, but it wants to destroy the private culture. The privacy of culture must be destroyed. There is no

31:28 privacy. Therefore, any scholar who comes to talk or talk about the The most frustrating word is the word "speciality" This word is very difficult to use Speciality in the Islamic religion, speciality in culture, speciality in the nation, etc. Therefore, they do not accept that there is acceptance of the means of living The West has surpassed and presented humanity and great services through the means of living But he doesn't want to export the means of living to man except with the comprehensive scientific culture The comprehensive

32:18 scientific culture which is the knowledge that religion has no influence on values, morality, or any human behavior Does the religion want its owner to worship? Yes You study religion, study it in yourself and those with you You worship yourself, but this is only a personal behavior that does not have anything to do with the lives of others. Therefore, the process is very difficult to be far from the great control of the event, the great control of the universe. Man

33:03 is naturally weak. How can he be strong? He is strong by his scientific leadership in religion His scientific leadership is not consistent with many details Even it is not consistent with the prosperity of the battle Does everyone feel that Islam is in a big challenge now? Things go easily in the Islamic world, but in fact, the Islamic world is just its identity, just its

33:51 reference and its legislative sources, and its religion is separated from its state, and its morals and values are separated from its religion. Therefore, we are facing many challenges. If so, there must be a discussion with the soul to know what our strength is. The speech, the power in the speech scene, does not benefit. The rationality in knowing the situation and the situation is what benefits. The patient must

34:36 say that he is a patient until he feels that he must treat the disease. Yes, the treatment of the disease may take a long time, but it must be treated. Are we satisfied that the unity of the nation is forgiven by the time and we are the regents of countries, each state is responsible for itself, and it is possible in one way or another to weaken this state by any of its values and control it in one way or another without being within other countries. There are large systems and meetings and associations and institutions,

35:24 regional, international, Arab, Islamic, etc. But its activity The effectiveness of these organizations in religion, culture, and in the means of power, in the factors of the union, are all weak means. Efforts are made, but they are not at the level of challenge. Here, we must always go to the available power. The available power to allocate the sources of legislation in people And this remaining belonging to religion, monotheism, and the following of Islam and

36:14 believing in Allah, may Allah be pleased with him, Allah and his messenger Muhammad Ibn Abdullah and his messenger This whole need to deal with this big challenge with the available The available is the individual power The general opinion Instead of putting effort into believing in people And not looking at the challenge of time Time challenges with its shadow The forces challenge with its shadow the

37:03 same scholar, the same thinker, the same scholar of Islam, etc. It casts its shadow and intensifies it until it almost sees no way out But we are given great pain because the messengers did not win The messengers resisted and the messengers refused but they did not reach the result immediately. Some of them were in the position of 100 years, some of them were in the position of 200 years, and some of them were in the position of 1000 years. For Allah, wisdom is in the rules of human defeat. The rules of human defeat are for Allah to be wise in. How is it possible? Why do the believers get tested for long years, 100 years, 200 years, and so on? Allah has wisdom in that. But how do you deal with religion so that you can bear the blame and you are connected to Allah Almighty

37:54 and in yourself you are opposed to the atheistic ideas and the non-religious ideas with their different forms? liberalism, secularism, secularism, etc. This must have a vision in it. The vision is that it must be directed to the individuals, the individuals of the Muslims, and to save what Allah Almighty wanted to save them, and to make it easier for you to address them. Therefore, cooperation in directing the public opinion, The general opinion of Islam is that the Islamic scholars earned it in the first

38:40 centuries. Why? Because they refer it to the sources of acceptance. No matter how the policies change, the states established the national state and the Abbasid state came, then the Abbasid state was divided into states, then it went, then it came, and so on. But people in their reference, in their religion, the reference is one because the connection with scholars made them this stability in that with the existence of differences and the existence of separation in things. But faith is the sources of legislation, the return to

39:25 it This is a firm statement. No one says that the book is not a proof, nor is it a Sunnah, nor is it necessary to read the Qur'an again, to repeat the Tawweeb, to read the Sunnah again. The Sunnah is a good example from which what the mind agrees with and what the mind does not agree with, does not suit our time. The Prophet ﷺ came to a people in an early age, he fixes the condition of the Badiyah, he fixes the condition of the Arabs, he fixes the condition that does not suit the time of the clouds, nor the time of the computer, nor the time of culture, until the end of such a speech. Dear brothers, whoever wants to control the culture, the culture of the world,

40:13 or the scientific field, they do not relate to each other. If you heard it, you would know for sure that the battle is great in the Islamic world. The battle of the unity is a very huge battle. Therefore, I say from here, from the site of the research, not from the site of the responsibility, from the site of the research, the mere researcher and the scholar of the scientific field, that we are facing a very, very, very big challenge. And this great challenge does not save us from it, except that we are on the strength of connecting with Allah, may Allah be glorified and

41:03 exalted. And that Allah, may Allah be glorified and exalted, is more precious to us than anything. And that He is the One who precedes, may Allah be glorified and exalted, over everything. This faith is what breaks all barriers. Therefore, the battle of thought and culture The battle of morals, the battle of values, the battle of religion in itself, this battle is not easy to think of. It is the most intense in the whole world. And therefore, the direction is for the world to be in the world with one culture. There are some minor characteristics

41:53 that must be eliminated within the next 50 years. The whole world must be one with one idea and one culture, which is the open scientific culture. Religion has nothing to do with man. Not only the state, religion has nothing to do with man. One day, what they hope for, We believe in Allah and we say that this will not be about Allah and His power, while they hope that there will be a cultural gap for everything related to the history of Islam. Therefore, the relationship between the Islamic

42:41 civilization and the Arabic language and the recognition of religion is a fundamental relationship. The Arab nationalism has become strong. It had goals, but it was dangerous in some concepts and it was conclusive in scientific concepts, but it was dangerous in some concepts, so it was destroyed and destroyed. The Islamic nationalism, the Islamic nationalism, the Islamic nation was found in a number of proposals, then it was crushed and crushed until it became

43:28 weak and became a part of history. Today, scientists are between the conscious and the unconscious. They are between those who think that now it is possible for the religious to achieve a goal by being against its brothers. They are publicly saying that they should increase the amount of money and the response of the scholars and their self-employment in order to win the truth. In fact, the scientific idea

44:17 is stronger than the idea of the interested with the Islamic call Therefore, some people who are interested in the Islamic call whether it is a pre-Islamic or a movemental interest some of them are deceived and they are forced to achieve the goals of cultural, scientific and modern vision in a way that they do not feel and in the end they think that it is a good thing while it is not so Here, always The one who suffers from these matters must ask himself the same big question. When

45:02 a problem comes from the problems that may affect the unity of the nation, he looks for the beneficiary. Who is the beneficiary of this? We find that answering this question determines the benefit. If the beneficiary is the right, The beneficiary is the research, the beneficiary is the way of expression, the beneficiary is the sources of legislation. At that time, there will be a scientific discussion within the correct nation. But if the beneficiary is the scientific, the beneficiary is the modernization, the modernization of the Western modernization, the modernization of the world,

45:51 or the culture of the world, if he is the beneficiary, how can he enter it? How can they enter into the culture of the nation? How can they enter into the religion of Islam? Not being aware is not an excuse because everything is present today. You can find books on atheism, secularism, modernity, and all the ideas in detail in any library. The liberal schools, liberalism, and everything related to that, liberalism, liberalism, freedom, and its types, and the type of freedom in its general concept. The state and the state's

46:40 systems are separated from the authority of religion. So it meets in one way or another with secularism. If the state is separated from the authority of religion in its systems and in its legislations, we have entered into its complete idea to oppose the existence of this nation. The Islamic nation cannot be destroyed except by its scholars. Because the scholars They are the ones who are able to say what came in the sources of the legislation. And the scholars are

47:25 the ones who are in favor of this stage. And therefore, scholars must take their duty towards the unity of the nation by their meeting, by removing their differences, by cooperating to serve the greater goal, which is not to deprive the religion, not to deprive Islam, and to remain only saying so and so prays, so and so, okay But he has no influence over behavior, he has no influence over values, he has no influence over the state's systems, he has no influence over legislation Allah, Almighty, is isolated from ruling on his earth, Allah is the Creator He is the One Who created, and

48:11 whoever created, he has the command This is the creed of the Muslim, and therefore the sources of legislation Al-Kitab, Al-Sunnah, Al-Ijma'a, etc. The sources of legislation must be judged How should you judge to unite the nation? By the scholars But if not by the scholars, then don't trust them So the scholars must organize their situation And to review their accounts And to look to the future and that they are dependent on it And that if they are deceived, then they are the ones who are cursed You can go online and see all the websites with all the ideas You can delete

48:58 them or read them directly or delete them on paper and analyze and look You will find that the matter is bigger than you think Therefore, it comes to those who want success And these people want, they have sincerity They want success between Islam and the whole scientific community Tawfiq will bring us different schools of enlightenment. But in fact, it is not the end. You are a good enlightenment. You want to know what the limits are. Where to? In the end, he will find a sense of

49:47 surrender or not to the whole scientific community. Or he says: "No, this is my limit." "Why did you stop at this and not at what was before?" He says: "This is a need." "The need will increase tomorrow, the need of society will increase." Accusing Islam and defending Islam does not mean to abandon the sources of legislation. It does not mean that we say that we are avoiding believing in God. As a goal for society, a goal for countries We are not going to use legislation in the government, judiciary, and in the institutions and in the organizations

50:35 Thinking to solve the problems, it must be a realistic thinking To be in the middle of the road, the beneficiary is the strong Always, if a strong and weak comes, the weak says I will solve part of the problem But stay with him in the middle of the road If the meeting is in the middle of the road, it may be a comprehensive solution, and it may be in the legal standards and the purposes that support it. But the fact is that the meeting in the middle of the road is a step to remove this opposition and convince it. He says, "Okay, let's walk a little." After five years, four years, the idea ends, and the

51:23 companion ends, and there is the end of the comprehensive religious thinking. Here we say that the path of the unity of the nation is through the sources of legislation, through the people of knowledge. And other than that, the comprehensive scientific knowledge is increasing and the world is increasing. with material strength.. with planning strength.. with great media strength.. with the weakness of man.. the desire to be free.. the model that.. a beautiful model.. a

52:09 beautiful man.. who is happy.. who is living alone.. living as he wants.. etc. Allah, Almighty, has not created life with this view. If Allah, Almighty, had allowed this.. It was a beautiful thing and we were relieved. It ended. We put the dot and closed the book. But Allah Almighty did not create it. That is why some say, those who say that the Ummah must be torn apart and to rise again with the comprehensive scientific idea, some of them say that the reason for the decline and the reason for

52:58 the extremism It is not people's thoughts It is the Qur'an The Qur'an is the reason And it comes to you with verses and hadiths One of them says He is a Moroccan thinker A scholar One of them says The Qur'an has 500 verses There are 500 verses in killing, fighting, confrontation, and harm to others, and so on.. And there are several verses in the word of Allah, peace be upon him, and so on.. So, he says: I don't want to make you feel bad about this.. But, to make you understand that.. There is a person who says that the problem is in Qur'an.. In

53:46 some countries, they don't have the authority to do so.. They didn't reach this stage. But know that those who attacked Islam want the Qur'an. They want all the sources of legislation to go. They say the Qur'an is the cause of the problem. All the heavenly books, the religious books, the Qur'an, the Bible, the Torah, etc. They say it's the cause. All the extremism is the result of these books. and therefore, the religion must be removed from life until there is a noble human life and no one enters it. These ideas have affected Muslims and therefore, they are a strong deterrent in

54:34 building the unity of the nation. In fact, they are a great obstacle in that. Here we come to the stages. The return of the power of the Ummah and the monotheism of the Ummah through the sources of legislation must be in agreement with it. There must be an agreement on the sources of legislation and there must be an invitation to the Ummah to pay attention to the sources of legislation. What we call here in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is monotheism. The monotheism of Allah Almighty in His subordination, divinity, names and attributes. The monotheism of the The monotheism, the monotheism of the legislation The belief in what came from the

55:22 Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him The law is the judge Here, if the word of the law is the judge They say, okay, what is the concept? The law is not correct And in it and in it If we are convinced of the principle It is possible to renew Therefore, we have the concept of renewal And the concept of connection with the scientific knowledge These two concepts Are pointing me to Each one has a different owner and a love for Allah and His Messenger So one of them comes and is deceived in the name of renewing But he renews not for the sake of religion but for the sake of the whole scientific community

56:07 Therefore, it is not an excuse to say that I renew And he does not know where this renewal is going He says I will join this and that in new systems of life in making it easy for us to explain the merits of the religion of Islam. But you must know that the fruit will not take them. And in the end, you will be the one who loses. Defending religion is not the same thing. Yes, many defend it, whether in Western circles, through universities, through centers, through research, and they are grateful and they make a great effort to defend Islam and to clarify its facts. But the fact is

56:53 that there is a search that is not free. The search is a search for compensation. The research today in the world, even if it is allowed for Muslims to speak and for the religious world to speak, is based on tyranny. We are the strongest, you must listen, but you are given a chance to say what you want. But tyranny is what is going on in the world. The scientific, intellectual, and political exploitation is what is going on in the world. But the way is to be with the believers, Muslims, students of knowledge, thinkers, and intellectuals who carry the burden of this nation, to have knowledge of the reality, and to be wise and loyal people, and not to be hasty.

57:40 things with something that Allah, Almighty, didn't value.. and to know how to take power.. and how to hold the power.. and how to make generations.. The prophet, , came to a people of polytheists.. and Abu Bakr, may Allah be pleased with him, was with him.. and they were only two.. then, they were followed by a third.. then, till the end.. for 10 years.. they were one hundred.. a small number of people in the city then in the city they increased and became more and more then after 20 years it became the matter that the Qur'an and the Sunnah are the most controlled in the earth and all of this

58:29 gives you that the work must be from but it must be from sincerity and sincerity and knowing the enemy therefore Allah Almighty In Qur'an.. more than the mention of enemies.. more than their mention.. A group of Jews.. a group of Christians.. the hypocrites.. the enemies.. the devil.. the enemies.. enemies.. enemies.. And Allah, Almighty, said in Surah An-Nisa.. after mentioning some of the enemies.. "And Allah knows best of your enemies.. " 2:196 ".. and sufficient is Allah as a guardian and sufficient is Allah as a helper.. " ".. sufficient is Allah as a guardian.. "

59:14 مَنْ لَمْ يَكْتَفِ بِاللَّهِ وَلِي لَهُ So, he is not enough for anyone.. And, if you are not enough for Allah, as a helper for him.. then, no one will help him. All of them will be in your way.. If you are not victorious with Allah.. and you think that.. the helper is Allah, and that He is the Lord of Allah.. and the rest of the people are means that you can use.. you can benefit from all the means that are available.. the means of humanity.. the means of the countries.. the means of the industries.. etc.. But, there is no such thing as.. we are not aware of the end.. and we don't know.. Where is the location of the foot? This is undoubtedly weak in the view of the unity of the nation and how it is taken by the power of the force Therefore, here

1:00:00 we say that the people of knowledge differ from others The people of knowledge have awareness, but they have wisdom and knowledge of the fate of God Almighty The fate of God Almighty is stated in his universe By weakness and power One of the names of Allah, the Exalted, is the "Splendid Climber" And they are two names that are both mentioned and released upon Allah, the Exalted The "Splendid Climber" Because, as Allah said in the Qur'an, "And Allah crushes and makes it easy" Allah, the Exalted, crushes until He crushes the religion And He crushes others then he simplifies the religion and takes others because his wisdom is in his creation, it is necessary

1:00:49 but the invention is available to each one of us the invention is available as for us to consider that there is no existence of a battle and that this is in our illusions and that people do not plan for a comprehensive scientific knowledge on earth and that people do not want from the Islamic countries except to be like this and that the battle and the thinking becomes easier and more clear, this is not good and no one knows how people think. Yes, we do not go too far in negative thinking, but we must be

1:01:35 aware until we go to a future stage. The influence on the existing forces is all according to its ability. A person.. from among us.. doesn't live.. in a single life.. He lives.. in his home.. in his work.. in his institution.. in his country.. in his life.. in his.. He must have an impact in every place he is in.. But, he must have a consciousness.. Because, if he doesn't have a consciousness.. things might pass.. and he might not be able to.. But, he must have a consciousness.. to know.. where the world is heading..

1:02:20 and therefore it is not successful because today the battles are bigger than you think Take one example the battle of the term a simple word that does not affect the term The term is first thrown at people who think philosophers think about how the term affects people The Islamic nation is a nation that is late in The creation of its terms Although the Holy Quran is the source of the Quranic texts There is a use of a new term in the concept of

1:03:07 Islam Not in the first Arabic concept Now we receive terms Our media receives them The Mashayikhs receive them But there is no chance for them that all these terms come and be used Who came with the term terrorism? Terrorism in this direction Terrorism started in Europe, and it was in the Middle East, but it spread in Europe in the late 19th century, and then terrorism. They searched in books printed in the 1920s and 1930s, the difference between terrorism and the Fidai, and then they entered into many cases until the end. Terrorism started there,

1:03:52 then this title was used and finally it was used in private. The term "political Islam" started in Europe. It started in Italy. The scholars were interested in the term "political Islam" and they had books on it. Then he moved from 30 years or 40 years to analyze some of the existing manifestations and use them. and he has used this word.. in one way or another.. some of them are correct, and some are not. Islam.. Islam.. has not been about worshiping in the mosques.. or in the houses.. or in the masjids only.. Allah, Almighty, has only one worship.. and that is the obligatory.. but, also, the judgment.. and to judge among

1:04:41 them, about what Allah has revealed. There are many verses of judgment in Qur'an.. It shows that Islam came not to be isolated from life, but to be in life, to be influential. But the abrogation of Islam with non-legal concepts and without the guidance of scholars, here came a lot of wearing in such topics. The search for many things It will be a burden if we forget the Western terms. Therefore, we have a big challenge. I say that the way starts from the people of knowledge in unifying the nation through the sources of legislation and

1:05:31 working with all available means, whether they are government collective collective schools and other organizations, etc. Everyone should work because the battle is big and the idea of a battle is to be brought out is a new superficial thinking and it does not represent the reality of the other on this nation. The subject has a scope As-salamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa

1:06:20 barakatuh Peace, mercy and blessings of Allah be upon you. Thank you, Sheikh Maali, for what you have presented. The time is really tight with us, so I don't want to comment. I wanted to comment on Sheikh Maali's lecture with what you deserve, but the time is tight. I have many interventions and questions from the brothers and sisters present, but the brothers who are present on the -

1:07:17 foreign The same is true for the same subject. Also, at the King of Saudi's University, there is a lecture on Tuesday at 10 a.m. about the

1:08:02 role of scholars in social cohesion. Also, there is a full lecture at the University of Prince Noura in the Faculty of Literature, about women and their role in society and the second part is about women's participation in public affairs and making decisions in societies. In fact, there are many interventions with Ali Sheikh, but allow me to start with the side that we can call the weak side. I will start with the women's hall. We have an intervention from the best sister, Dr. Suhaila Husein Hariri from Umm Al-Qura'a University.

1:08:49 Please, I hope that the interventions, whether female or male, are within the limits of two minutes. Dr. Suhaila, please. Peace be upon you, and God's mercy and blessings be upon you. Peace be upon you, and God's mercy and blessings be upon you. and praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds. May Allah's peace, mercy and blessings be upon us. As for the next thank you, I would like to thank Dr. Tawfiq, and the noble Malali Muzir Al-Antaq, and Sheikh Saleh,

1:09:40 the family of the Sheikh. I would like to enter the Qayyimah lecture and present the question in a different way, the noble Sheikh, if we say what is the reason for the difference between the nations? When we say why Allah says and

1:10:34 says The faith is not affected by what Allah says. Allah says: "We give something and do not delay it, because He said to us" So we say how to enter the Imam in your hearts. They say that it is the right

1:11:20 of the Prophet. He is the most righteous in the world. But I am speaking the truth and the truth is the most important. To correct their behavior, we must Al-waqt yaa doktora.

1:12:15 Dr. Suhaila, thank you. Thank you Dr. Suhaila. First of all, I thank the doctor for her presentation. The beginning is to improve the soul. First, the soul is reformed. Whoever is not strong inside, he will not be strong outside. If he is strong inside, he will not be strong afterwards. If he is

1:13:02 internally strong, he will be strong from the outside. Power does not multiply. Power, if it is found in the heart, it is found outside. But the one who is internally strong, he will be strong outside. That is why I am very grateful to this doctor. This is the power of Allah's power. Allah is the greatest. Yes, this is the power. Allah is greater than everything around us. This is the truth. This word is the most powerful. Thank you.

1:14:19 I thank the Chief of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Saleh Al-Sheikh, I have a question for Mouadid Sheikh.

1:15:06 How can we that we are able to prevent the demand of knowledge, prayers and youth from being destroyed in the partial and superficial way that causes disagreement, discrimination, conflict, and discrimination, and the migration and the displacement of Muslim youth. How can we prevent such a deep, total, and deep vision that is in our understanding of religion as a belief and a claim? May Allah reward you. Thank you for your commitment to this sheikh. First of all, we must know, not understand everything. The wisdom of Allah, may Allah be

1:15:56 pleased with him, we do not understand it, we know things, but we do not understand why many things happen in the universe. The Prophet, peace be upon him, came out to his companions, peace be upon him, and said, I asked Allah three, so he gave me two and prevented me from one. The Prophet said, I asked Allah three times, and he gave me two and one prevented me. I asked him not to destroy my nation for a year in general. I mean, they come

1:16:43 with their own people, and they destroy them, and they don't stay with anyone. So he gave me one. And I asked him not to destroy them with an enemy other than them. So he asked for his mercy. So he gave me one. When an enemy comes and destroys the nation completely, he doesn't stay with anyone. So he gave me one. ".. your nation is still." And, I asked him.. the third Dua'a.. "That He may not cause them any trouble between them.. " 2:126 ".. and prevent them from it." This is in the time of the prophet, SAW.. in Al-Madinah.. And, the Da'i is the prophet, SAW.. and the one who is called; is the Lord of the worlds. So, he

1:17:32 gave him two, and he prevented him from it.. one. "That He may not cause them any trouble between them." Why did Allah, Almighty, allow him to cause this people trouble between them? This is not in the wisdom of the Most Merciful, nor in the wisdom of the Most Merciful. We say: "To Allah is the wisdom that is abundant in all things." But the question here is not how the separation happened, nor why the separation happened. Because this is not up to you. Allah, Almighty, made it like this. "So that people may seek to deal with this." Therefore, seeking How do we deal

1:18:17 with the infidelity? This is a topic that needs to be discussed. This is a long and a big research. The separation in the Ummah is a recent event. The Prophet said: "And indeed, this Ummah will be separated into 73 groups, all in the Fire, except one." And the question is: "Who is the Messenger of Allah?" He said: "He who is like me, what I am to him today, and my companions."

1:19:07 All of his words in the Fire are a warning, meaning that we heard that they are disbelievers, but no, it is a warning to them according to their violations that they are promised, because the truth is clear, the Qur'an and the Sunnah are clear, that they are to strive to make mistakes and to strive to be offended by what Allah Almighty has, but in general, the right is not present. How do you deal with this dispute? This is the secret of the people of knowledge.. and the secret of the person.. But, Allah, Almighty, has a great wisdom.. "And they are not different.. " 2:196 ".. except those who are merciful to their Lord." Allah has allowed this.. and His wisdom has been established.. The prophet, SAW, asked.. if this will happen in the Ummah.. because

1:19:54 he was afraid of his Ummah.. and because he knew that this will happen in the previous Ummah.. He said: ".. So he prevented it from happening.. " And that's why it came in Sahih Muslim that he, peace be upon him, said, The people of knowledge said, when he saw the pride of Islam to worship the prayers in the Arabian Peninsula, but he remained confused

1:20:40 between them. - and the youth of the world to the book of the Sunnah and to the sources of the revelation of the teachings of the Shaykh. One of the reasons, as Sheikh Ahmed said, is that

1:21:31 modern knowledge in this era helps us to accept the truth that we are the Lord of the Self, and quality, meaning the words of our Sheikh, may Allah have mercy on him, the three leaders. So I thank God in this era, through the speech of the Minister, and through the visits of the leaders of the countries, to direct people generally to the religion of truth, the construction of the scriptures and the sunnah, and to the schools of the most reputed and the most respected. The role of the Islamic Ministry, which is a prominent official institution in the practice of this, the adoption of the sources of legislation, and we are from their universities, the University of Imam, the University of Madinah, and others,

1:22:16 - - We ask Allah to make us stronger than they think and to make our future better and to weaken the trap of those who want to be good people. Dr. Harkar Mohamed Ahmed, President of the African and

1:23:03 Arab Cultural Center for Research and Studies in Chad. Please, Dr. Harkar. In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Peace and blessings of Allah be upon you, Muhammad. First of all, I thank the State of the United States for the opportunity to meet you. And I thank the Chief, Dr. Salih Sheikh, and the As Allah said,

1:24:15 We are united in our Lord, our Prophet, our Messenger, in our book, in our legislation, and even in the geography. The geography is not only the word "daira" but also the meaning of the word "daira". This is the meaning that happened recently in the legislation of the Islamic State. I am the minister and I will establish my opinion in the Islamic school. which was used by the Islamic nation. This school is a... It's not a school, Doctor, it's a religion, a

1:25:04 religious or intellectual religion. The result of this school is the result of the knowledge that was acquired from the educational side in the Islamic nation, which is the same as some schools in Islam. "The Islamic State has no connection with the Saudi Arabia, which is linked to the Islamic Sharia and the return to religion and to

1:25:54 God." "It deserves thanks." This school and this school of knowledge have made the whole country of Islam. Therefore, after the arrival of the revolution, this school remained. The ministry that you are leading is on the side of the people of Islam and on the level of the world, the influence of this ministry from the Arab world, which has a special legacy. I say this word, a special legacy. Not only the Muslims, but

1:26:40 also the people of the world. Thank you, Mr. Mahad. Thank you. The idea is clear, Mr. Agar, and I agree with you. The basis of your thinking is like that. But this is the problem. The problem is who accepts the knowledge of the scholars. Now there are many ideas that say that the scholarly may be associated with religion.

1:27:28 It may be Islamic scholarly. I don't know how, but they say it may be Islamic scholarly. Sometimes it is proposed in some countries that scholarly may be Islamic. Like what was proposed in the communist era, the "Syriacism of Islam" Like what was proposed, they say, "I don't know what Islam is" So everything became a copy of the "Sura" The scientific idea or the scientific religion is a set of principles that are committed to it and he is a religion that accepts the human being for him, this is the definition of religion in language and in Shariah and from it Allah, Almighty, said in Surah Yusuf

1:28:16 about some of the legislative rulings for the king that he should not take his brother in the royal religion, meaning in the royal legislation, except that he should. In the scientific idea, basically, it is to separate religion from the state The Islamic State, as I said, is divided into values, morals, behavior, and relations. The state that wants to be Islamic and can be Islamic, has been proposed in many examples. Turkey is not Islamic. Tunisia tried to be Islamic at some time. Egypt tried to be Islamic at some time. But Islam

1:29:04 cannot be secular, nor is it Islamic. But this is a mixture produced to satisfy the strong in the existence of Muslims in power and government. This idea is very important It was applied in a number of countries for the purpose of limiting the

1:29:51 opposition. But in fact, there is no relationship between secularism and Islam, whether you believe in Islam or secularism. Secularism is 100% against Islam. Secularism is to separate religion from the state, to separate Islam from values, to separate religion from values, morals, behavior, and human life in its society. Therefore, there is no link between them. If we produce scientific Islamic copies, those who make these copies will bear it. Thank you. Thank you, Dr. Haqqani. Dr. Khaled bin Abdulaziz Abulkhail, the Amid of the College of Sharia and Islamic Studies at Al-Qasim University. Thank you, Mr.

1:30:37 President of the session. Thank God. The view is great on the people of Al-Qasim. It is a great event. Just let me say something quickly, and we will be at the end of the time. Sheikh, may Allah be pleased with him, about the issue of the illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal illegal They started to implement the same projects as Mohammed

1:31:25 Al-Qod and Mohammed Al-Dajabri and others who tried to facilitate the tradition and the tradition. They were in great distress. Then another proposal came that it is not allowed to facilitate the tradition and the tradition. It should be a complete division between the tradition and the tradition because it is not a facilitation of the tradition and the tradition. The reason for my assessment that leads to the difference in the causes of legislation is the defense approach. When we defend the principle of the Sharia, for example, when we say that these people must, as an example, in the Prophet's Sunnah, when he says that these people must have the mind present in contradicting the Prophet's Sunnah, in contradicting the principles of the Sharia. Imam Al-Ma'aliyah, may Allah have mercy on him, when he responded to some of those who criticize this approach,

1:32:12 it was a very good approach for the defender. Many of those who responded before him to Thank you, Mr. Khaled for this proposal and your interest. The issue has a scope, but if we say that the mind has an entrance, but the mind of Sheikh Abdulrahman Al-Mu'allimi, may Allah have mercy on him, and the mind of scholars when they talk about the Sunnah and its contents,

1:32:58 it is not the mind of so-and-so, of those who do not believe at all, or those who do not believe in the Sunnah, or those who are the sources of the French or Western thought. There is a difference between the mind and the mind. Here we say the mind has no, who is the mind? The mind is different. Who is the mind? Is it the mind of the scholar? The mind of the scholar is considered. The mind of those who believe in Allah as their Lord and Islam as their religion, and believe in the sources of legislation, and are a supporter of Allah, a supporter of Allah, is a mind that accepts to be discussed about its dangers and dangers. But a person who is a scholar, who says, I am a supporter of the Sunnah by my mind, is not accepted. Because his mind is different,

1:33:46 because his mind is not the mind of the Sharia who refutes the Sharia texts, he refutes them with another mind. Therefore, the criticism of the dead is the case of the dead, which Sheikh Abdulrahman mentioned and Dr. Khalid Al-Jazakallah referred to it. The criticism of the dead is a existing case. There is a Hadith from scholars.. against the idea of the Matn.. i.e. the Matn is not a problem in the mind.. For example.. He said: If the Hadith has a silly nature.. You know that it is not a Hadith.. It is a silly nature.. but.. from the point of view of the scholars.. For example; Hadith.. If the rice was a man, it would be a

1:34:36 sweet.. This is not said by the prophet, SAW.. I mean, it is not possible.. and he is judged by the Isnad, from its basis Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy on him, in the "Munif" seminar in the distinction between the right and the weak the seminar where he mentioned many bases in the response of the Hadith from its subject but this is the creation of the people of knowledge yes, they discuss the text of the Hadith with the mind but the mind of the scholar therefore, as a whole issue the mind is contradictory there is no one mind When people say the mind is so and so, the mind is contradictory. The old Western mind depended on stability. The modern Western mind after the

1:35:24 industrial revolution and after the mathematics became an experimental mind. It was invented. This is one mind, but the stability mind is not the experimental mind in evaluating matters. The word "Aql" is a plural word. If we wanted the Greeks to realize this problem, they would say, "Ok, the reference is the Aql." So they put the logic, the knowledge of logic, to maintain the Aql from the distortion in the Aql. In judging things, I mean, the knowledge of logic came to adjust the mind so that any mind is not said in known steps that you think about to reach the truth. The

1:36:14 logical mind is also Greek, and it has not been developed by Aristotle and others. and they also discussed many issues in many of them. But when Europe came to the industrial revolution, two big schools, the school of independence, which is the school of Aristotle and the school of Plato, Aristotle's school had the church with them and so on, They had the truth that was only proven by reading the mind, which is the result of reading the other. The modern science came and said that this is a complete error. Reading is not the only truth. Reading is a

1:37:00 proof. If you see a thousand pictures, a thousand cases, the subject may contain a million cases. You don't have to see a million, there may be ten million cases. So reading, even if it is complete reading and does not exist, So, it is not against to be partially read, therefore, it is not possible to be true by reading what was established in the history of the human mind, which they consider to be perfect From Aristotle to the rise of the Industrial Revolution After that, the Industrial Revolution came and many researches in mathematics and mathematics and mathematics philosophy entered A very important thing for the human

1:37:46 mind is the experience. The experience is the best proof. This is true. So, try, here you get the word. If the experience is based on modern science, it will be a comparison of the truth. If the truth is open, try. The experience is what leads to the facts, not the stability. Therefore, the stability mind does not reach the truth. It brings the thing closer. He brings the thing closer, but he doesn't reach the truth. What reaches the truth is the experience. The experience is what tells you if it is true or not. That's why Einstein says in some of his speeches: "You cannot do one experiment twice, one

1:38:33 experiment with the same components twice, and reach different results." This is true. They have entered into the question of how to know that the experience.. the mind.. how to know that the experience is a good result. So, they have entered into a new philosophy, called; The criticism of the experience. The standard is the criticism, not the submission to the experiment. The experiment must always be taken to the process of criticism, and criticism until we are convinced that the experiment is correct. The religious philosophy and moral philosophy have entered the scientific philosophy and they said that the experiments

…