0:00 Before we begin, don't forget to pray for your brothers and sisters everywhere. We ask God to grant relief to His oppressed servants. Peace be upon you. Before anything else, this video is not suitable for children, so no one should watch it with their young children nearby. On January 30, 2026, the US Department of Justice, along with the FBI, after years of stalling and promises, finally decided to release more than 3.5 million documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. They created a dedicated page on the Department of Justice website for people who wanted to see what the files contained. But the problem was the way they were presented. Deputy Attorney General Tooty Blanche appeared at a press conference and said that they had done a great job reviewing these files and that they were working with complete transparency. All they did was remove
0:46 information that could harm the girls or affect national security. But the problem is that the people, investigators, and journalists who delved into the files discovered that the matter was far from transparent. The redaction process was a scandal by all accounts. Entire pages... Many names are obscured in black, while others have their names removed from one page only to appear on the next. Information that should be confidential about the girls is publicly available, and other names are crossed out for no apparent reason. This makes people feel like someone is trying to cover up a bigger disaster, and that these 3.5 million documents are just a farce designed to conceal the truth. I reiterate that this episode is not suitable for children. Keep in mind that no matter how much time I spent researching, I've likely missed a lot. People are still uncovering information.
1:33 We're talking about 3.5 million documents. Welcome, and let me tell you about the Epstein scandal from beginning to end. But before we start, don't forget to subscribe and turn on notifications so you're alerted about new stories as soon as they're released. I want this video to reach 20,000 likes before the next one. I need your support! And I apologize for my voice. I have a cold and severe back pain. If any of you like puzzle games, don't forget to download our new game, "Words," from the Play Store. You'll find the link in the description box. First, to understand why the Epstein scandal caused such a stir in the West, we need to understand how they view the issue of girls' ages. The whole discussion revolves around one word: minors. Western law considers anyone under 18 a
2:18 child, not responsible for their actions, and it's legally prohibited to have any relationship with them, even with their consent. So, if a girl is 17 years, 11 months, and 29 days old and entices an older man into having a relationship with her, the law would consider it rape. The man would be prosecuted, and the girl would be considered a 100% victim. Incidentally, this is what the Netflix documentary about the subject tries to frame. But if we go back to the details mentioned in the documents and testimonies themselves, we'll find that... Many of the girls went to Epstein's houses willingly and were paid handsomely. One of them was practically a resident of the island and would bring other girls, her friends, to be treated the same way for thousands of dollars, either by explaining what would happen beforehand or by deceiving them into thinking they were going for a massage. Netflix's documentary portrayed her as a
3:04 victim and bombarded us throughout the film with how much we should sympathize with her, even though she was a criminal just like Epstein. She was working as a pimp for him. This is not, of course, a defense of this criminal, but rather an explanation of the situation so we can understand the difference between us and them. In Islam, our standard is puberty. When a girl reaches menstruation, she becomes accountable, rational, and capable of distinguishing between right and wrong. She will be held responsible for every action she takes and is eligible for marriage, childbearing, and bearing responsibility, even if she hasn't yet reached the magic number set by the West, which is 18 years old—a number that, by the way, didn't exist in the past. Until the 1960s, in the West, girls were almost always married around the age of 10, even princesses. It wasn't just the general public; their laws actually permitted adultery and extramarital affairs, provided the
3:51 partners were close in age. So, if she was 14 and he was 15, they could do as they pleased—no crime, no shame, nothing. That's why all the politicians and celebrities who went to Epstein's island denied it. Their denial wasn't because they were going to be caught committing adultery or fornication. Their problem was that it involved minors, meaning it was a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment. And who knows, maybe in a few years they'll change the law again and say that relationships with minors are okay as long as there's consent, or maybe they'll raise the age of consent to 60 or something, since we change the laws to suit our whims whenever we want. Just as homosexuality used to be a crime punishable by law, now it's a legitimate and guaranteed right, and
4:36 if you object, you're the one who might face imprisonment. Before we delve into the specifics of the cases themselves, we need to ask ourselves first: Who is Jeffrey Epstein, the man who caused such a stir? Jeffrey was born in Brooklyn in 1953 to a working-class Jewish family. He entered university but didn't complete his studies and left without a degree. Suddenly, miraculously, we found him working as a physics teacher at Dalton School in Manhattan in 1974, one of the schools attended by the children of the richest and most powerful families in all of New York. The question that arises is: how could someone without even a degree work in such a place? The answer is that Jeffrey was appointed by Donald Barr, the father of Bill Barr, the former US Attorney General. What was the connection between such a powerful figure and a young man from a modest Brooklyn family who hadn't completed his education?
5:21 Nobody knows. The important thing is that during this period, in the mid-1970s, Epstein wasn't the ideal teacher. He wore gold chains, unbuttoned shirts, and a slapstick outfit, not to mention his questionable behavior with female students. He continued like this until he was expelled from school. But strangely, the expulsion wasn't the end of the road; rather, it was the beginning of a meteoric and completely illogical rise. Suddenly, without any prior experience in the financial field, Jeffrey Epstein went from being a dismissed teacher to an employee at Perry Stearns Investment Bank. How? One of the parents at the school, who were all influential people, recommended him directly to the bank manager. And after only four years, Epstein went from being a mere assistant at the bank to a limited partner in one fell swoop. But just as quickly as he entered, he left. In 1981, he was
6:08 investigated for insider trading, which is illegal. And from here began the truly mysterious journey of this strange man who, every time he fell, rose even higher. After Epstein escaped the financial cases that were supposed to end his career, he entered the stage of accumulating wealth. The terrifying figure, whose exact origins remain a mystery, founded a company called Epstein & Partners for asset management. He set a bizarre condition: he wouldn't accept clients unless their wealth exceeded one billion dollars. This was a significant move, considering he had just emerged from a federal investigation and lacked extensive experience in financial management. Yet, billionaire Leslie Wexner, owner of the Victoria's Secret empire, suddenly and without warning handed the keys to his entire fortune to Jeffrey Epstein. He granted Epstein power of attorney, allowing him to manage his money and assets as if they were Epstein's own.
6:54 Through this relationship, Epstein's wealth began to increase. In a truly bizarre move, Wexner gifted Epstein a Manhattan mansion, considered the largest and most expensive private residence in all of New York. And of course, this was in addition to the vast sums of cash that flowed to Epstein under various guises. Little by little, Epstein began to cultivate the image he wanted to project to the world: a billionaire financial genius and a friend of scientists. But behind the scenes, a different story was unfolding. During this period, Epstein was involved in major fraud cases, most notably the Towers Financial scandal, in which he was a partner with Steven Hoffenberg. This was one of the biggest frauds in history at the time. Hoffenberg was sentenced to 20 years in prison, but Epstein got away scot-free, even though he and Hoffenberg admitted that Epstein
7:40 was a key partner. This supports theories that Epstein was always protected. If Leslie Wexner was the key to Epstein's wealth, then Gillian Maxwell was the passport that allowed him entry into the elite. To understand Gillian, we first need to know who her father was. Gillian is the daughter of the British billionaire and media mogul Robert Maxwell, a Jewish billionaire with a vast empire in Britain. No news story went by without his involvement, and he was known for his strong ties to the Zionist entity. Many suspicions surrounded him. In November 1991, Robert died in a car crash, and the yacht was discovered. His body was found in the middle of the sea, floating on the surface of the water. The official report said he drowned, but no one believed it at the time. The strangest thing is that when his family came to
8:27 look for his fortune, which was estimated at $2 billion at the time, they discovered that it had become zero. The banks seized everything, and his pampered daughter, Jelline, whom he used to take with him to all his parties and meetings with VIPs, suddenly found herself going from being the daughter of a billionaire to someone who was penniless. At the memorial service held for her father after he died, Jeffrey Epstein appeared. Epstein approached her and promised that he would help her and her family in their crisis, and from that moment their relationship began. Jelline became his friend, his company, and also his lover. She was the one with the connections and relationships that could reach anyone, and he was the one with the money that could open any door. The first piece of advice she gave him was that the easiest way to get close to the powerful was through donations, and of course, we mean public donations. And indeed, Epstein started a huge donation campaign for
9:12 universities. And scientific research centers, and this made his name shine as a philanthropist who loved science and scientists. From here, his connections began to expand. The huge mansion that Epstein took from Lesley Wexner for just one dollar in the heart of Manhattan, the most expensive area in all of America, turned into a trap for girls who dreamed of fame and stardom. Glenn was hunting for teenage girls under the pretext of holding castings for Victoria's Secret models. The girls would go there hoping to become models, but instead of meeting fashion designers from Victoria's Secret, they would meet Epstein himself. He was always accompanied by Glenn Maxwell, who at that time played the role of his wife. She was the one who convinced the girls to do anything Epstein wanted. "You're not doing anything wrong," she would say. " Everyone does it." But in the late nineties, they
9:58 began to worry that the secrets of the Manhattan mansion might be revealed, so Glenn suggested that he buy a private island in a place far from people's eyes. And indeed, in April 1998, Epstein bought an island from The Virgin Islands, specifically Little St. James Island, was an ideal place for the Epsteins. No one could enter without his invitation, and no one could leave easily. Located in the middle of the sea, he built a huge two-story palace with dozens of suites and luxurious guest rooms. But most importantly, not a single inch of the island was unmonitored by hidden cameras. Any guest who entered the island was filmed without their knowledge. The next generation continued the role of the woman, going to places where girls aged 14 to 17 were present, or places where the wealthy gathered. There, she would approach
10:44 girls working in simple jobs and offer them an easy job: a half-hour massage for a rich man for $200. During the session, the situation would escalate into sexual assault. Often, many of them didn't object to the sex, since life there was already easy, and this was a billionaire who would shower them with money. And believe me, Western society does much worse for less money. That's a lot, but there's no doubt that some of them weren't satisfied because, no matter how depraved society was in their eyes, there were definitely still people there who weren't. Then Epstein would turn the girls into part of the network. He'd tell a girl, "If you bring me one of your friends, I'll give you extra money." So the girl would go and convince her friends to go with her, and so the network kept growing. The girls were introduced to his friends who visited him. In other words, it was a prostitution ring
11:30 whose clients were some of the most important and powerful figures in the world. In 2002, before Epstein's name became public, the first attempt to expose him happened. Vicky Ward, a journalist from Vanity Fair, was commissioned by the magazine to do an investigation into the successful businessman Jeffrey Epstein. But while gathering information, she stumbled upon a girl named Maria Farmer and interviewed her. Maria recounted that when she worked at the reception of Epstein's Manhattan mansion, she saw with her own eyes a flood of girls who were two generations old. She brought them to the house and described how the entire house was riddled with small surveillance cameras. She said that one day Epstein showed her the room with the monitors that displayed everything, and she saw live feeds from cameras mounted on beds and in bathrooms. She also recounted how Epstein and Maxwell assaulted her
12:17 personally in 1996. When she reported it to the police and the FBI, they threatened her, telling her not to continue down this path. Maxwell told her to be careful when she was running next time, and Epstein threatened to burn down her house. In addition to Maria, they also approached her younger sister, Annie, and told her they would help her with her education. But I have a problem with this point; if Maria knew those two were filthy, how could she let them get to her younger sister in any way? Anyway, even her younger sister, after being lured with the promise of educational assistance, was eventually assaulted at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico. Vicky Wart, after The investigation team decided to confront Epstein, and Vicky went to his mansion herself. He denied everything, of course, and even kicked her out. Later, on her way home, Vicky received a call from Epstein himself. He told her, "I'll be very upset if I don't like the investigation
13:03 you wrote, and take care of yourself so your delivery goes well," as she was pregnant at the time. Despite her insistence on publishing the investigation, the magazine refused and instead published an article praising Epstein titled "The Talented Epstein." After Vicky's failure to publish the story, Epstein continued working as usual until March 2005. At that time, the Palm Beach Police Department in Florida received a call from a mother reporting that her 14-year-old stepdaughter had been sexually assaulted. She explained that a classmate had lured her to a wealthy man's mansion, offering to give him a half-hour massage for $200. There, the man assaulted her. The report reached Police Officer Michael Reiter, who... He took
13:50 the matter to heart and began investigating the details. He discovered that the mansion the girl described belonged to the famous businessman Jeffrey Epstein. He started monitoring the mansion and noticed strange activity: girls who looked to be middle and high school students going in and out. He began reviewing old reports and found one from two girls accusing Epstein of the same crime. These girls were Maria Farmer and her sister Vicky, who had been conducting the investigation with them. Michael tracked them down and followed the leads until he obtained testimonies from 33 girls, all between the ages of 14 and 15, all of whom recounted similar stories. With this evidence, the police obtained a search warrant and raided the mansion. There, they were able to retrieve photos of girls in compromising positions. The evidence was ready, the case was closed, and Epstein was brought to trial. Of course, everyone
14:36 expected this to be the end of this notorious pimp. Their law stipulated that he should be sentenced to life imprisonment because, under their law, this was considered a case of child exploitation, even if she was only 17 years old. Eleven months, as we explained, is no joke. But after he entered the courtroom for two or three hours, he was found outside. The first thing he did after leaving was board a plane and fly to Tel Aviv. From there, he hired 250 lawyers to defend him in America. These lawyers, led by Alan Dershowitz, managed to reach a deal with the then-federal prosecutor, Alexander Costa. They agreed that Epstein would confess, but only to one charge, and it would be a reduced one: recruiting a minor for immoral acts. In exchange for this confession, he would only be sentenced to 18 months in prison. More
15:37 importantly, the deal contained a secret clause granting Epstein, and anyone else whose name appeared in the case, immunity from any future prosecution related to this case. The suspicious deal wasn't just about the reduced sentence and immunity; even of the 18 months he was sentenced to, he only served 13 months and was released for good behavior. The 13 months he actually served were part of the deal. He was allowed to leave prison for 12 hours every day, six days a week. He would wake up in the morning, and someone would pick him up in his private car from the prison gate. He would go to his office, do whatever he wanted, and return at the end of the day to sleep. He was even allowed to customize his cell to his liking, making it like a room in a five-star hotel. After he was released, he resumed his life completely normally, as if nothing had happened. After Epstein's release, his case and his shady dealings remained buried for many years until 2017. At that time, journalist Julie Brown from the Miami Herald was working on a series of investigations into corruption in the American judiciary. While she was going through old files,
16:24 Epstein's case file caught her eye, so she decided to dig deeper. She met with the first police officer who had handled the case, Michael Reiter, who told her all the details he knew. Julie continued her work and investigations until she found 80 other women besides The 33 that Michael had reached, and more importantly, she managed to obtain a copy of the agreement between Epstein's lawyers and the federal prosecutor. In November 2018, she published a series of articles titled "A Perversion of Justice," containing all the investigations, testimonies, and documents she had uncovered. The articles shook American public opinion. All channels, newspapers, and social media were abuzz with the Epstein scandal and how the American judiciary had been complicit with him for a long time. The public and media pressure was immense, to the point that the US Congress demanded an immediate investigation into the old deal and the reopening of the
17:11 entire Epstein case. While the uproar was raging, Epstein was in Paris, but he received assurances from his network of contacts in America that the matter would be swept under the rug like before and nothing would happen. However, this time there was social media, and people had easier access to news than before. On July 6, 2019, he decided to return to America, confident that the matter would indeed be swept under the rug. But the surprise was that as soon as his plane touched down at the airport The FBI was waiting for him and took him in handcuffs. The police obtained permission and raided all his houses and mansions and brought out treasures: computers, CDs, pictures, notebooks in droves containing records with the names of all the people who frequented him. Epstein was taken to the high-security Metropolitan Federal Prison in Manhattan, and everyone was waiting for the trial of the century
17:58 that would open the biggest heads in the whole world. A few weeks after Epstein’s arrest, a very cheap Hollywood scenario happened. On August 10, 2019, the world woke up to the news of Epstein’s death inside his cell. The official version that came out was that he hanged himself, but of course from the first moment no one believed it, especially when they learned the details. The circumstances surrounding the death were very suspicious. Firstly, Epstein was the most important prisoner in America at the time, and he was supposed to be under strict guard. Two weeks before his death, he had an alleged suicide attempt, and as a result, he was subsequently placed under something called suicide watch. It means 24- hour security with cameras. But, by the grace of God, the surveillance was removed from him days before his death. Secondly, on the night of his death, the Monday guards who were
18:45 supposed to check on him every half hour overslept for several hours straight. When they woke up, they were scared and fabricated the records to cover up their negligence. Thirdly, the cameras that were monitoring his cell and the corridor, miraculously, also suddenly malfunctioned that same night. Fourthly, his cellmate was transferred from his cell just one day before his death. Of course, all these strange coincidences made the scenario hard to believe, and the phrase that spread throughout the world at the time was that Epstein didn't kill himself. Moreover, the forensic doctor, Michael Baden, whom Epstein's own family had appointed to investigate, came out and said that the injuries on his neck resembled strangulation more than hanging. But the surprise was that Epstein didn't close the case; on the contrary, he made people more determined to know the truth, not only about his crimes
19:31 this time, but also about who was protecting him and who decided that he had to die from the first day the case appeared. The Epstein affair and the suspicions surrounding his relationship with intelligence agencies, the most prominent theory being that he was an agent of the Israeli Mossad, and that his entire network and island were part of an intelligence operation aimed at blackmailing world leaders and ensuring their loyalty to Israel. The first piece of evidence for this was the nature of his relationship with the Maxwell Gillen family and her father, Robert, which was an integral part of his rise. As we mentioned, Robert Gillen was known for his strong ties to Israel, to the point that people said he was a Mossad agent. This was reinforced by the fact that when her father died, he was given a state funeral in Jerusalem, attended by then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, who delivered a eulogy in which he described
20:17 Maxwell as having done more for Israel than could be said today. Also present was Chaim Herzog, the Israeli president at the time, who also delivered a eulogy, saying that he had reached heights no one else had attained, and that kings and princes awaited him. In addition, six heads of the Mossad and other Israeli intelligence agencies were in attendance. One piece of evidence is the statement by Alex Acosta, the federal prosecutor who brokered the 2008 deal for Epstein. He told Trump's team, when he was being considered for Secretary of Labor, that they told him Epstein was involved with intelligence agencies. He did n't specify which agency, but this confirms that Epstein was affiliated with an intelligence service in some country. A third piece of evidence is the email exchange between Epstein and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak in December 2018. Barak was arranging a meeting with Hamad bin Jassim bin
21:05 Jaber Al Thani, the former Prime Minister of Qatar. In the email, Epstein tells Barak that he needs to clarify to them that he doesn't work with Mossad. Barak replies, "Neither you nor I." Epstein confirms that he was speaking for himself. We don't know if he actually meant he was n't working with them or if he meant to tell Barak not to forget to cover it up. There are also many other communications hinting at Epstein's connections to various intelligence agencies. Furthermore, he was a financier of Israeli cyber weapons companies. When all these threads are put together, they paint a picture that Epstein Island was more than just a den of iniquity. Prostitution is very likely to be the biggest honey trap in modern history. Important figures are lured into compromising or criminal situations and remain under threat and blackmail for the rest of their lives. This explains how Epstein was able to amass such influence.
21:53 We've reached 2026, and after years of stalling, lawsuits, and procrastination, the US Department of Justice and the FBI have released a massive batch of files—about 3.5 million documents, in addition to thousands of photos and videos. Deputy Attorney General Tutpe Lynch stated at a press conference that they reviewed 6 million documents and decided to release 3.5 million because the rest were either irrelevant or for reasons related to national security. However, this statement raised doubts about who exactly decides what is relevant and what is contained in the other 2.5 million documents. Despite the enormous quantity released, many people fiercely attacked the Department of Justice, saying that this release was a charade, not an investigation. The truth is, it's nothing but an attempt to absorb public anger and close the case. Besides, the documents they
22:39 released were riddled with problems. The redaction process, which involved obscuring sensitive information, was a scandal by any measure. Top Launch kept boasting about the accuracy and professionalism with which they handled the documents, but when people looked at the files, they found the redactions ridiculous. In one file, you'd find a person's name obscured in black, and in the same file, the name would be written somewhere else. The biggest problem was the contradictions. You'd find a document with three different versions, each with different redactions. In one version, they'd remove names; in another, they'd leave the names but remove case numbers and addresses. Anyone who puts the three versions side by side can read the entire document. This made people ask, "Is this just stupidity and incompetence, or are you doing this intentionally for some reason?" The girls' lawyers came out and said, "The government promised protection..." The girls are the ones who exposed them to the world. More than
23:25 40 girls had their names appear in the documents without any redactions, including one of the key witnesses in the Glenn Maxwell case. Her driver's license was even fully visible, without any redactions. In contrast, the names of potential suspects were carefully redacted. Analysts believe this chaos was orchestrated by the Department of Justice, either to confuse people or to intimidate the girls and make them regret speaking out. The first files we need to look at are Epstein's emails. One example of the leaked correspondence is a short email from Jeffrey Epstein to an unknown person (whose name was obscured). In it, he asks, "Where are you? Are you okay? Did you like the torture video?" What torture video is he talking about? Who is he exchanging torture videos with? And why are they discussing the matter so casually? When the FBI confronted
24:11 Jeffrey Epstein's associates, they kept saying it was a bad joke. And this torture video, you'll find it was an action movie or a boxing video. Another email dated September 2011 between Epstein and someone named Tancredi Marcello. Epstein was asking him what he wanted to do with her, try to have sex with her or torture her. But another email dated November 2013 between Epstein and someone we don't know, who is hiding behind Epstein, is telling him they want a list of new people to do ice cream boarding with, my version of torture. So the guy replied to him and said, "What is ice cream boarding?" This is something like waterboarding, but with ice cream. Waterboarding, for those who don't know what it is, is a well-known torture method that intelligence agencies used in interrogations. They would take a cloth, dip it in water, and then use it to suffocate the person they were interrogating. They would stay like that until the person was about to
24:58 drown and then leave him. Incidentally, this is now internationally prohibited. The man then went and told him, " I imagine today is your torture day," and finally said, " Happy Torture Day." All of these are indications that confirm that violence and torture were an essential part of Epstein's world. Another email from someone who worked as a driver for Epstein, named Roy Hughes, says, “ Epstein, I wanted to tell you that all the guys really enjoyed the pizza today. Thanks for letting us do that.” Of course, it seems that he was treating them to pizza or something, but the phrase “ thank you for letting us do that” is a very suspicious sentence in the context, especially when we know that the word “ pizza” was mentioned in Epstein’s files more than 1000 times, and in some files, it was redacted and re-uploaded after they removed the word “ pizza.” So now the search results show 845 mentions of
25:45 the word “pizza.” What was the purpose of redacting the word “ pizza”? In addition, there's another email from someone who worked with Epstein, probably Steven Coffin, but his email address is obscured. He sent an email with a picture of a girl and the subject line " Pizza Monster." Epstein replied, saying she looked pregnant. Besides, linking the word "pizza" to sexual assaults and scandals isn't new. It's part of a well-known conspiracy theory called Pizzagate, which emerged in 2016 and linked Democratic Party officials to a network of sexual assaults. At the time, mainstream media strongly attacked the theory, considering those promoting it to be simply delusional. One of the things people have been talking about since the release is the big names that have been mentioned, names that, frankly, don't involve the kind of major scandals people are saying. These people are at the
26:31 top of the world; they have everything we could dream of, or even things we couldn't dream of. Do you think they go on Hajj one year and fight for God the next, or something? And one of the most prominent names is, of course, Donald Trump. The relationship between Trump and Epstein is longstanding and well-known. Both were socialites in New York and Palm Beach in the 1980s and 90s, and photos of them together filled magazines. Trump himself, in a 2002 interview, described Epstein as a wonderful man who loved beautiful women, just like himself. However, after Epstein's first imprisonment, Trump tried to distance himself from him, saying he cut ties and banned him from Mar-a-Lago. In reality, the new documents didn't provide evidence of a direct crime committed by Trump. What they did provide were details of some investigations and reports. One of the documents, for example, was a report from a woman who said that Ghislaine
27:17 Maxwell introduced her to Trump at a party like a commodity being displayed. Afterward, Trump invited her to Mar-a-Lago and personally took her on a tour of the resort. Maxwell and Epstein were with them at the time. The woman confirmed that nothing happened between her and Trump, but the atmosphere was conducive to it, and Maxwell kept saying things like, "I think he likes you. You're lucky." She gives him advice on what to wear and what not to wear to please Trump, but there are many other reports containing serious and significant accusations. However, all the reports came from an anonymous source; we don't even know who it is. It's just a phone call or an email, or the FBI, when they investigated him, said his credibility was unacceptable. We'll elaborate on these reports in a bit. If anyone has built their image on being against the grain and against corrupt institutions, it's of course Elon Musk, the
28:03 richest man in the world, who presents himself as the hero fighting agendas and calling for transparency. When the Epstein story started to emerge, he was one of the most vocal in demanding the release of the files, and he always came out saying, "I refused Epstein's invitations and I never went to the island." But emails say that Musk was the one who was seeking the visit. In December 2012, Musk sent Epstein a message saying he would be in the Virgin Islands on vacation. Epstein replied, asking how many people he would bring with him for the helicopter. What he would take from the island, he said, probably just me and Tallulah, who was his wife at the time. He asked Epstein which day would have the most raucous party on his island. Other emails show he was planning a visit in January 2013, but it didn't happen. Not because Elon Musk refused, but because Epstein canceled, saying his
28:48 schedule wouldn't allow it. So the story he was telling, about being a hero who resists temptations, was just nonsense. But that doesn't necessarily mean he had anything to do with the palaces case; he was just a billionaire going to party on someone else's island. Among all the big names that surfaced was Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft and one of the world's richest men. The files revealed that Epstein was blackmailing Gates. In a draft Epstein wrote for himself in 2013, he was preparing a threatening letter to Gates. Epstein was trying to pressure Gates to restore their business relationship. After Gates tried to cut ties with him following his imprisonment, Epstein wrote to him in a draft, expressing his surprise at Epstein's behavior, especially after the services Epstein had provided. Epstein had met the Russian girl Mila Antonova in 2010 and learned of her
29:36 relationship with Gates. Epstein paid for her programming school out of his own pocket and then demanded repayment from Gates. Of course, Epstein didn't need the money; he was a billionaire. He was simply trying to make Gates understand that he had leverage over him, mentioning the sexually transmitted disease he had contracted and the antibiotics he had secretly given his wife. In short, Epstein was pressuring Gates to reinstate him and restore his social standing, which had been damaged after his first imprisonment. Although the email was just a draft Epstein sent to himself—no one knows for sure if he actually sent it to Gates—it certainly reveals the nature of their relationship. Despite Bill Gates' team denying all of this, Epstein wrote that it was a draft email. Lies, but there's a truth that's hard to deny. Some time after the date of this draft, a $2 million donation was transferred from the Gates Foundation to MIT, on the
30:23 direct recommendation of Jeffrey Epstein. Also among the big names that surfaced was Prince Andrew, but this time it wasn't just talk; there were also photos. Out of more than 180,000 photos that were published, a group of pictures of Prince Andrew, Duke of York, son of Queen Elizabeth and brother of King Charles, appeared. The photos had no explanation, no date, nothing to indicate where they were taken. The photos showed the prince on top of a woman whose face wasn't visible. Regardless of what was exactly happening, the images spread like wildfire. In addition to the photos, there were emails between the prince and Epstein in 2010 arranging a romantic date between Prince Andrew and a 26-year-old Russian woman whom Epstein described as intelligent. And Jamila and Andrew said he would be delighted to meet her, which shows that
31:09 their relationship wasn't just a casual friendship; it was a completely dubious relationship. Andrew is now a royal pariah, stripped of many titles and reduced to a mere member of the family without any official role or military rank. King Charles is trying to completely erase him from the public eye to protect the reputation of the throne, to the point that he's even forbidden from standing on the balcony with the rest of the family. Another prominent name that emerged was Bill Clinton. Although Clinton completely denied ever visiting Epstein's island, victims confirmed seeing him there. Furthermore, flight records show he traveled on Epstein's plane 26 times, mostly for charity dinners around the world, but these also indicate a close relationship between them. In a declassified document from January 2024, a
31:54 victim, using a pseudonym, stated that she saw Clinton on the island with two young women. Moreover, when Police raided Epstein's mansion and found a strange painting he had hung there. It was a painting by artist Petrina Ryan Cland depicting Clinton in the Oval Office, sitting in a chair, wearing a blue dress and red high heels—a clear reference, of course, to Monica Lewinsky's infamous dress and the scandal involving Clinton. Analysts say this was Epstein's way of exerting psychological control over Clinton, and not just him, but everyone else too. Hanging a painting that humiliated a former US president in his home was a message to anyone entering: "I have the keys and secrets to the most powerful people in the world, and I'm not afraid of anyone." One of the strangest names to emerge was
32:40 that of the fundamentalist physicist Stephen Hawking, whose name was mentioned in the context of a group sex party. But the truth is, regardless of my personal dislike for this man, given that he was one of the most influential figures in spreading atheism, people misunderstood the context. Hawking's name was mentioned in a message between Epstein and Gillian Maxwell, during the defamation lawsuit Virginia Giuffre filed against her, in which Giuffre accused Maxwell of being Epstein's pimp, told her to offer money to any of her relatives or friends if they could help prove her claims were nonsense, especially since they had a strong card to play, like her claim that Stephen Hawking attended a gangbang. Epstein wanted to prove Virginia was talking nonsense, so he chose the Stephen Hawking story, which was popular at the time, as an example of an illogical claim to use in
33:26 court. He wanted to show the court that this guy, who's practically paralyzed, was at a gangbang, and that her claims about him, me, Prince Andrew, and Clinton were all fabricated. It's true that Hogg did visit Epstein's island in 2006 and attended a scientific conference Epstein organized there, but there are photos documenting the visit. Many scientists who attended these conferences said they went because Epstein was... They generously fund their research. One of the most talked-about topics is the Kaaba covering that was sent to Epstein. The story began in February 2017 when Saudi businesswoman Aziza Al-Ahmadi, residing in the UAE and CEO of Boss Bunny Games, a video game company, and an advisor to the Department of Culture
34:12 and Tourism in Abu Dhabi, coordinated with a man named Abdullah Al-Maari to send three pieces of the Kaaba covering to Jeffrey Epstein. The email stated that they were sending them to "For the Mosque" for the purpose of building a mosque, but it's unclear whether they were discussing the construction of a mosque. The text is vague. The pieces sent included one from inside the Kaaba itself, another from the outer covering, and the third was a piece of fabric from the covering that had never been used before. The pieces were indeed shipped by British Airways and arrived at Epstein's house in March 2017. Aziza Al-Ahmadi She sent an email to Labsteen explaining the value of these pieces. She said verbatim, “ This black piece has been touched by at least 10 million Muslims of different sects, Sunnis, Shiites, and others, as they circumambulate the Kaaba seven times, and each one of them tries as much as he
34:59 can to touch it while praying to God, hoping, and crying that all his prayers will be fulfilled while he touches this piece.” The emails do not explain how Aziza knew Epstein or why she sent him that particular piece. Some reports say the relationship began when Epstein sent a letter to the Saudi royal court proposing the idea of creating an Islamic digital currency like Bitcoin. Aziza took an interest in the matter and she was the one who handled the communication. But the strange thing is that the name Aziza Al-Ahmadi is mentioned 969 times when we search for it in Epstein's files on the Ministry of Justice website. This means very intensive communication, especially between her and Epstein's secretary, Lesley Grove. Besides that, they communicated about other things entirely, almost like friends. For example, when the hurricane destroyed Epstein's island in September 2017, Aziza contacted Lesley to
35:48 check on their safety and ask about the island. When the secretary told her there was damage but the people were okay, Aziza replied, "I promise I'll send you a new tent," and added a laughing emoji. Another time, Aziza messaged the secretary asking if she could stop by Jeffrey's house that day before leaving New York to say goodbye and wish him a happy new year. She said she would only need 15 minutes. The secretary replied, "I think there's no problem, but let me double-check and get back to you." The files don't say whether Aziza visited the island or not, and there's no evidence that she knew about Epstein's crimes or not, and there are no criminal charges. Neither America, nor Saudi Arabia, nor the Emirates are against her, but the strange thing is that after the scandal, Aziza deleted all her accounts from the internet. No one can reach her or hear her comment on the matter. In fact, even the gaming company that she is the
36:33 CEO of had all its pages shut down. The last name we will talk about, and this is not because it is the last name mentioned, but because if we continue like this we will never finish, it is the name of the Egyptian activist Wael Ghonim. Wael Ghonim appeared on the list of invitees to a meeting organized by Epstein in 2014. At that time, Wael was living in America and was one of the prominent global figures in the field of technology and digital political activism after the January Revolution. Epstein likely saw him as a digital influencer and wanted to add him to his network. But here's an important point: there's a big difference between travel logs and schedules. Wael Ghonim's name didn't appear in the travel logs; it only appeared in the schedules, and next to his name were hundreds of other academics and researchers. So, he probably didn't go at all. There's
37:19 nothing linking Wael Ghonim to anything Epstein was doing. It's also important to clarify that not every name that appears in the documents means someone is involved in a crime. Some people might have simply attended parties or ordinary meetings at the home of a billionaire who makes donations to many places and has connections with most of the world's elite. Then there's the correspondence between Epstein and his friends, which he's clearly implicated in, or the names of people that appeared in the documents who don't actually have anything incriminating against them. Regardless of the hype on YouTube for views, a large portion of the files came from the National Threat Operations Center (NTOC) of the FBI. The one that contains most of the horror stories people tell is the National Transaction Reporting Center (NTOC). To clarify, the NTOC is the place that receives reports and denunciations from ordinary citizens. Anyone walking down the
38:06 street can pick up a phone and report anything they want, and the FBI records the report. That's why we have to treat this information with extreme caution because it's not necessarily true. It could just be claims from unreliable people or people with a vested interest in accusing someone. Yes, criminals are capable of anything, but that doesn't mean we should believe every report. In Islamic law, the burden of proof is on the accuser. So, whoever accuses someone of something should have evidence. Let's cover the most important reports I came across so we can differentiate between rumors and facts. Among these reports was one concerning Donald Trump. A woman reported a story she heard from a friend (whose name was unknown). She said that her friend, 35 years ago, when She was 13 or 14 years old when Donald
38:52 Trump forced her to perform oral sex. She bit him while doing it, and he slapped her across the face. She also said she was abused by Epstein himself. The FBI recorded the report and noted that they contacted the complainant and sent a request to the Washington office to interview the parties involved. We don't know what happened after that, but when the FBI checked the woman's criminal record, they found she had a prior assault conviction and was arrested in 1987. This type of report is generally considered the weakest because it comes from a third party— someone recounting what someone else told them. Furthermore, as we mentioned, anyone could have other motives for filing a report, especially against a public figure like Trump. The Department of Justice itself commented on some of the reports, stating
39:39 they were baseless and false, and that they were filed shortly before the 2020 election. This, of course, makes us suspicious. Another woman, whose intentions were revealed, stated that when she was 16, she worked as a model and attended eight parties at Epstein's mansion in New York. She said that on one occasion, she was sexually assaulted by Epstein, and on another occasion, two brothers lured her and a friend upstairs to have sex with them. She and her friend ran downstairs, but the brothers caught her friend, and one of them forced her into the act. Then their third brother appeared, and she said she saw him forcibly having sex with a third girl who was 14 at the time. One might ask, if she had been sexually assaulted before, what would make her attend eight parties, and what would make her
40:25 go back to the party to be assaulted by two more people? I'll tell you, the story doesn't end there. She also said that she attended group sex parties at Trump's golf course in California between 1995 and 1996, and that big names like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Robin Williams were present. Leach, the well-known TV host, claimed that Glynne Maxwell organized these parties and that some of the girls who attended disappeared. She said she heard rumors that they were killed and buried on the field. She also said that Trump's head of security at the time threatened her, telling her that if she spoke about anything happening there or anyone she saw, she would become "fertilizer for the earth" like the rest of the " loose" girls. She further claimed to the FBI that she had videos of adults at these orgies, videos of them
41:11 making deals with major drug cartels, and even a video of Robin Leach strangling a girl at one of these parties until she died. The FBI commented on the story, stating that they contacted the informant and deemed her unreliable because further investigations revealed she had three prior incidents with the police, each of which resulted in her being subjected to mandatory psychological evaluations. Moreover, she failed to produce the videos she claimed to have, leading the FBI to conclude that she was not trustworthy. The second story was about a regular limousine driver who transported the wealthy. He reported that in 1995, he took Donald Trump in his limousine to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport. On the way, Trump was sitting in the back talking on his cell phone, and the driver, of course, could hear him.
41:56 He said that what Trump was saying on the phone was very disturbing, and he was about to pull over, kick him out, and give him a beating because of what he was saying. He said that Trump kept repeating the name "Jeffrey, Jeffrey, Jeffrey" throughout the conversation. The story didn't end there. The driver also said that Trump had an ex-girlfriend, and that this woman had two daughters. According to him, these two daughters were victims of Epstein, and one of them was killed. Even the surviving daughter told the driver that Trump had assaulted her and that Epstein had assaulted her. This is a very serious report, but at the same time, the combination of these two events in one report requires further investigation. Anyway, when the FBI contacted the driver, he didn't respond. So, we now have one person who reported... With such dangerous information, he disappeared and hasn't followed up with the FBI since. Whether he has
42:41 n't responded, whether he was scared, whether someone caught him, or whether he was actually lying and the whole thing was just a fabrication, is unclear. Another report states that in 1987, a friend of hers, whose name appears in the file as victim number one, went out with her friends and went to Trump Plaza, the famous Trump hotel in New York. She said she saw Donald Trump there, and like anyone who sees a billionaire, she wanted to meet him. A man approached her and asked if she'd like to meet Trump, and she said yes, of course. The man said, "Okay, I'll introduce you," and gave her a drink. She said that after drinking it, she fainted and woke up to find herself naked in a room with $300 next to her on the bed. She doesn't know how she got to that room or who brought her, but she remembers one thing: she caught a glimpse of Trump's face. After she got home, she
43:28 called her friend and told her she felt assaulted, but she didn't go to her friend's house at that time. The hospital conducted a rape examination, and the woman said no one would believe her because she was drunk. Then, the first victim, who turned out to be married, began experiencing business problems with her suppliers; no one was willing to deal with him. The woman believed Trump was behind it. Later, this same woman entered into a relationship with a married lawyer (whose name is not mentioned). One day, she had a fight with him and went to a bar alone to calm down. A strange man approached her; no one knew him, but he acted as if he knew her. She walked with him, and from that moment, she disappeared. Many years passed without a trace of her until human remains were found somewhere. The body was wearing the same clothes the woman had been wearing the last time she was seen. However, when a DNA
44:15 test was conducted, the result was inconclusive, and the case was closed. Furthermore, when the FBI investigated the woman who reported the incident, they discovered that her criminal record was full. Arrests over a very long period of time, from 1986 to 2021, were all for theft and violence. So, of course, this whole story is a bit of a gimmick, and the most likely scenario is that someone paid her to make the report. Another report, also terrifying, although as we said, we can't verify reports. The caller was following up after a report she filed with the New York Police Department. The report stated that in 1984, when she was 13 years old and pregnant, people paid her money and coerced her into having sex
45:01 with them. She said that among these people was Donald Trump. She said that Trump paid her regularly to force her into sexual acts with him. When the girl gave birth, she had a baby girl, but her uncle killed the newborn and disposed of her body. She said that Trump was present and watched her uncle kill her child. The FBI tried to contact this girl but received no response, and the report was closed. And of course, apart from... Trump's personality and my stance towards him, which you all surely know, makes it very easy to take the numerous leaked reports from Epstein's files. These reports are specifically directed at Trump by his political rivals, to the point that Trump once came out and said that the leaked information actually supports his innocence rather than accusing him. Another report states that in 2004 and 2005, there was a
45:48 huge party hosted by Sir Ivan Wilmsford, the well- known American billionaire. Among the attendees were Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, and Sammy Souza, the famous baseball player. Years later, a woman informed the FBI that she was at this party and met a girl who was 18 or 23 years old at the most. She had come from Oklahoma to work as a model, but upon arrival, she was sold to a man in France. She wasn't the only one; many women at the party were being auctioned off. One woman named Colette was the woman who ran the operation. A few years later, another woman reported that... In 2007 or 2008, Colette saw a woman at the Cheetah Club in New York and said that she was running a similar auction. If the report is true, then the matter was not a random party, it was an entire system of human auctions, and we do not know what is meant by
46:35 selling. Selling means for one night to have fun with the woman who was sold, or slavery, or what exactly? We do not understand. Of course, the FBI tried to contact the woman who reported, but the phone number she left turned out to be wrong, and therefore there was no follow-up and no investigation. Finally, one of the most famous reports that people were talking about and that caused a great deal of controversy was the report of the man who said that he was a victim of strange rituals that took place on a yacht. On July 12, 2019, an email arrived at the FBI office in New York from a former FBI agent . The email was asking the office to contact investigative journalist Michael Moore. Moore was saying that he had a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and wanted the FBI to meet with him. When the interview began, the FBI agents noticed that the man's initial conversation and behavior
47:21 suggested he had a mental illness or emotional instability. However, they also pointed out that he was polite and respectful. The man said that when he was only four years old, his uncle raped him, and Jeffrey Epstein was present but did nothing. After his uncle did this, Epstein spoke to him. He then recounted that when he was eight years old, he boarded a luxury yacht. On the yacht, a doctor performed a strange medical examination on him. His uncle and other family members were present. During the examination, he said that the doctor or an assistant inserted a measuring tape into his anus. Afterward, he was drugged, and Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton assaulted him. Then, he was struck with a sharp weapon. Some reports say he was struck with a simitar, a curved sword, but the FBI report you see here doesn't specify the type of
48:08 weapon. He said they struck him on the bottom of his leg with this sharp instrument. He appeared and said that on the same yacht, he saw Black men having sex with white women, probably in a gangbang. He said the women's backs were cut with knives and blown apart. He also said he saw babies being killed, their intestines being emptied, and people eating things from them. His descriptions suggested something related to black magic or loyalty rituals. He added that all of this was happening while famous people were on the yacht, such as George H.W. Bush, whom he saw having sex with a Black man, as well as Henry Kissinger, the former US Secretary of State, and George Soros, the billionaire businessman. When the FBI asked him if he had any injuries or scars on his legs or back as evidence, he said no, only a cut near his anus. The
48:54 FBI wrote a report stating that he couldn't provide any actual evidence, and he didn't give them the names of any witnesses. They classified the entire report as unsubstantiated statements and suggested that his apparent mental illness might have caused him to act out his imagination. It goes way too far, but God knows best. Maybe this mental illness happened to him because something actually happened to him. We can't confirm that. Also, we must point out that these aren't all the reports; there are many others. But these are the things that caught my attention the most, and these are the things I found people talking about the most, so I wanted to clarify them. It's important to note that these are just reports; they might all turn out to be true, or they might all be false, so we don't just repeat what we hear. Anyway, the report I just mentioned is specifically the reason why the video of the model Gabriela Larrico spread like wildfire in the last few days
49:43 of August 2009, before anyone knew about all these Epstein issues. A model named Gabriela Rico Jimenez, 21 years old from Mexico, appeared in a video in front of a luxury hotel called Vista Inn in Monterrey. She was barefoot, her hair was disheveled, and she was screaming hysterically. People were gathered around her, and she kept saying in Spanish, "They eat people! They ate my friend! The police!" She was taken away, and official reports at the time said she was suffering from a mental health crisis. People speculated she was crazy, or using drugs and hallucinating. But strangely, Gabrielle never reappeared. No one saw her after that night—not in the media, not on social media, nothing. She vanished without a trace. There wasn't even an official missing person report. Her story remained just a strange one online until January 2026, when the yacht incident that people were still talking about resurfaced. When people saw it,
50:30 they connected it to what Gabrielle had been saying, and her old video from 2009 resurfaced with millions of views. People started asking if she had been telling the truth 15 years ago. But let's be clear: there's absolutely no connection between Gabrielle and Epstein. There's no evidence she knew him, no proof she went to his island, and no evidence that anyone killed or kidnapped her. Is this just a coincidence? Gabriella saw something she shouldn't have seen. No one knows for sure. The only certainty is that Gabriella has been out of the picture for 15 years. Ultimately, given the scale and organization of the Epstein case, it's unlikely that it was orchestrated by just one person. There was definitely a whole network of conspirators. So who are they, and why aren't any of them being held accountable? Gillian
51:15 Maxwell, his lover and the head of his main company, is the only one sentenced to prison besides Epstein himself. But a document that surfaced in the files shows that the FBI created a map of conspirators just five days after Epstein's death. The map contained only eight people, and six of those eight had their faces redacted in black. This means that the authorities knew there were other conspirators, so why were they hiding their identities? After everything we've seen and heard from the millions of documents that have been released, the biggest question remains: what did they choose to show, what did they choose to redact, and what did they choose not to publish? Of the original 6 million documents, only 3.5 million were released. That means the Justice Department chose not to release 2.5 million documents. Lawyers for the girls, activists, and even members of Congress are now saying
52:03 that the unpublished portion is undoubtedly the one containing the real scandals. People are afraid the government released a few scandals involving names like Gates, Musk, and Trump to distract the public while simultaneously hiding the serious evidence that could prove criminal offenses and put people in jail. Will we ever truly get to the bottom of this, or will the whole truth remain buried with the vile Epstein? And that brings us to the end of the story. I'm waiting for your opinions. If you have a story you'd like us to tell, write it in the comments. I'll work on the idea that gets the most engagement, God willing. Show me some enthusiasm! Subscribe, like, comment, and share this wonderful video with anyone you think would enjoy it. See you next time with a story that I don't know whether to call exciting or even worse than the last one. Bye.
