How To Train Your Dragon (2025) - Movie Review

Brief Summary

This video reviews the 2025 live-action remake of "How to Train Your Dragon." While the remake closely follows the original 2010 animated film's story, it falls short in several areas.

  • The movie takes longer to reach key plot points.
  • Astrid's character feels less expressive, and her romance with Hiccup lacks chemistry.
  • The CGI, while faithful to the original dragon designs, doesn't feel like a significant improvement over older films.
  • The return of composer John Powell and Gerard Butler is a highlight, maintaining a connection to the original's charm.

Intro

The reviewer introduces the topic of the video, which is the live-action remake of "How to Train Your Dragon." He notes the trend of live-action adaptations of animated classics and mentions that "How to Train Your Dragon" is not owned by Disney.

Overview of the Remake

The 2025 live-action "How to Train Your Dragon" is a remake of the 2010 animated film. Dean Delah, who directed the original trilogy, returns as the director. The remake closely follows the original story: Hiccup, an outcast and son of the Viking king, befriends Toothless, a Night Fury dragon, and changes his village. The reviewer notes that the remake takes longer to get to the point compared to the animated version.

Casting and Performances

Mason Thames plays Hiccup, filling the big shoes of Jay Barishell from the animated version. Thames does a great job bringing the awkwardness and heart of Hiccup to life. Gerard Butler returns as Stoic, which was a casting choice many anticipated. However, Astrid's character feels wooden, and the chemistry between Astrid and Hiccup is lacking, despite the actors having good chemistry in interviews.

Pacing and Story

The romance between Astrid and Hiccup, which was always secondary to the main story of Hiccup and Toothless, is not well-executed in the remake. The movie adds extra scenes to show Astrid's initial dislike and disrespect for Hiccup, creating a larger chasm between them without adequately mending it. Jokes from the original animation land well, but new ones do not. The live-action version is a half-hour longer than the animated film but doesn't improve upon it.

Music and CGI

The standout returning element is the music, with composer John Powell returning to compose the score. The reviewer questions the degree to which the remake feels like live-action, given the heavy use of CGI. He compares the CGI quality to older films like "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" and expresses disappointment that the technology hasn't advanced further. The dragons look like their animated counterparts, which is a positive aspect.

Final Thoughts

The movie is enjoyable and does pretty much the same thing as the original, but it takes longer. It feels like an extended cut of the animated film, with scenes that were likely cut for the sake of flow. The reviewer suggests waiting for it to come out on streaming. He concludes by asking viewers for their thoughts on the remake and which animated movies should be left alone.

Summarize any YouTube video in seconds

Get summaries like this one for any video, in your language, with the free Summ app.

Download on the Apple Store
Get it on Google Play

Transcript

Full transcript of “How To Train Your Dragon (2025) - Movie Review”. Click a timestamp to open the video at that moment. Need another video? Use the YouTube transcript generator.

0:00 Oh man, I got this forehead line right there. That's not actually a forehead line. That's a riding my motorcycle and I wear the cap under the motorcycle helmet to keep the hair out of my face line. This is the me you're going to get a lot this summer cuz I'm going to ride my bike a lot this summer. Anyhow, so another liveaction adaptation of an animated classic. Those have been going well lately. Silver Lining, How to Train Your Dragon is not owned by the mouse, so there is that yet anyway. So, this How to Train Your Dragon is a 2025 liveaction remake of the 2010 classic animated film How to Train Your Dragon 2010. This 2025 remake and the 2010 original is as far away as the 2010

0:47 original. And Assassins, Braveheart, The Net, Batman Forever, Water World, Mortal Kombat. Anyhow, that'll be a nice existential crisis to unpack later. So, moving on. And for this live action remake, director Dean Delah, who actually directed the How to Train Your Dragon trilogy, returns as director for the remake. And it's it's How to Train Your Dragon. This is actually a closer one:one translation than a lot of live action remakes have been. You got Hiccup. He's an outcast. He's the son of the Viking king. He's not living up to those expectations. He befriends a little dragon called Toothless, who is a night fury, the most feared of all the dragons, and then he kind of changes the game of the village, though runs into some tension while doing it. And it was

1:34 clear early on, a thing that would probably bother me in this movie, is that it was taking longer to get to the point than the animation did. In terms of the characters, Mason Thes plays Hiccup. He was the kid from Black Phone. I guess didn't recognize him. They grow up so fast. But he actually had some big shoes to fill. Jay Barishell as Hiccup is just kind of perfect in the animated version. The awkward feels awkward. The comedy feels like he could have very well adlibbed a lot of the lines. If there is someone I could cast to voice a Viking, it would not be him, which is why he's perfect for Hiccup. But Mason Fames actually did a great job bringing that to live action. The awkward still felt awkward. Most importantly, the heart was there.

2:21 That's really what we're here for. It's the heart between Hiccup and Toothless. It's that story. You feel that connection in here. The biggest connection you feel is between this kid and his CGI dragon that's not actually there. And the flying scenes with Hiccup riding Toothless in live action every bit as fun as it was in the animation or is animation still exists. Gerard Butler returns as stoic. I say returns because he voiced Stoic in the animation when we heard that How to Train Your Dragon was getting a liveaction adaptation. I feel like that's what we all thought. We were like, "So Gerard Butler is going to be in it because animated Stoic's pretty much Gerard Butler." Segueing, I felt Astrid was pretty wooden in this movie.

3:07 I'm going to be honest with you. Granted, Astrid's always been that really hard wannabe best at everything. personally seeing Hiccup as a rival and wanting to beat him at the games, though he's just gaming the game better. But in the animation, I remember her being a little more expressive. That's for everything else. And that's for everything else. I did not buy their romance or chemistry in this movie at all, which is a bummer because when you see interviews with the two of them, they do have good chemistry together. This movie apparently just didn't pull from any of it. Now, Astrid and Hiccup's romance has always played second fiddle in How to Train Your Dragon. For me, it is a love story between a boy and his dog who's a dragon

3:54 and the father-son story that too. But I feel one of the things this movie does to its detriment of the characters pertaining to that in particular is it wanted to show you more. So, we have extra scenes in here with the youth. We see how it feels more like a high school cafeteria scenario in which all the cool kids led by Astrid are sitting over there and Hiccup's over here. He's away from them. They don't respect him. They don't like him. But it spends a lot more time showing how Astrid doesn't like or respect Hiccup, creating more of a chasm, but doesn't spend more time mending it. So when she gives him the kiss on the cheek, you're like, I kind of came out of nowhere. This is a case of the jokes that are here that were in the animation, they landed just fine. the new ones. Eh, this liveaction version is a solid half an hour longer

4:41 than its animated counterpart. The problem is, as much as this movie feels like it doesn't try to reinvent the wheel too much, it's a wheel that's not as smooth as its animated counterpart because How to Train Your Dragon, the animation, it's pretty perfect. The thing that is to be gained is, okay, let's see it with a new coat of paint. Let's see how it would look in live action. And there is a market for that. If there wasn't, the PS5 would have died long ago because a large section of the PS5 library is a PS5 remaster of a PS4 game. It kind of feels like that if the game was 33% longer, but for no reason. The real standout returning character is the music. Composer John Powell returns to compose the music in the liveaction remake as he did in the animated classic. Having that connection of the How to Train Your Dragon theme feeling

5:28 the same because the same person's composing the music in here as did before. That was a smart connection for them to have. But the problem with this as well as a lot of liveaction remakes is to what degree is it liveaction? To what degree does it feel live action? We know a lot of movies these days are 95% CGI. Those behindthe-scenes videos of Avengers Endgame, Avatar, Way of Water, looks like they're all just hanging out in someone's garage. I'm just saying if you're going to live action remake, can we make the green screen and CGI blending look like, I don't know, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest or At World's End feels like we capped on the CGI 20 years ago. And it freaks me out because the gap of time between now and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest is the same amount of time between Pirates of the

6:14 Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest and Running Man, Predator, Lost Boys, Superman 4: The Quest for Peace. You know, it it feels wrong. It feels like we should have leapt a lot farther at this point. But I suppose as long as computer animated departments are underfunded, underpaid, but all the time crunch, I guess it's going to be that way. Feel like I'm going in harder on this movie than I meant to. I do appreciate the fact that the dragons in this movie look like the dragons from the animation. Like the character models are very much the same, but the movie's perfectly enjoyable. So, if you liked How to Train Your Dragon, you'll probably like this liveaction adaptation that does pretty much the same thing and same story, just takes longer to tell it. And that is a thing that a lot of these liveaction adaptations are going to run into, no

6:59 matter how well they do the adaptation. It's a good time. You also have the better time with a shorter run time that doesn't waste your time at home in some capacity most likely. This kind of feels like, you know, that movie that's such an excellent movie, then later on an extended cut comes out in which it has some scenes that are longer, has more content in those scenes. Maybe there are extra scenes and you watch it and you're like, "Yeah, I can see why those scenes were cut short or cut out for the sake of flow. I prefer the theatrical cut myself." That's what this feels like. This is like How to Train Your Dragon, the extended cut. It's worth checking out. Wait for it to come out on streaming. What's the over under? A month. It'll be out on streaming. It's why more people don't go to movie theaters these days cuz they're conditioned to be like or I could wait a month and watch it at home. So, How to

7:46 Train Your Dragon, the liveaction remake comes out this Friday. So, at a point you do see it. What did you think about it? But what's your favorite animation that man, you should probably just leave alone because it's that good. Whatever it is, whatever you think, comment below. Let me know. And as always, if you like what you've seen here and you want to see more, click right here to see more.

Share

More video summaries