Ivermectin sabotaged

0:01 These questions from Senator Johnson to Anthony Fauci relate largely to hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. And just before we start, I think there needs to be inquiries made as to why apparently respected [clears throat] research organizations around the world demonstrated that Ivermectin was not efficacious for COVID-19 infection. I believe it certainly is and a lot of others do as well. So, how how could this research conducted in the UK and around the world show it didn't work? In my view, completely erroneously.

0:48 Were research programs nobbled in some way? It's an open question. I first became of um became aware of Ivermectin Tess Lawrie to begin with. Um Dr. Tess Lawrie. Um and then I heard about the work of Dr. Jackie Stone in in Zimbabwe through Professor Colleen Aldous. How she was using it to increase oxygen saturations in hospital where no oxygen was available. Anyway, this clip FDA attacks on Ivermectin working for vaccine injury. In in in many cases, I've certainly seen that myself personally. Um Dr. Fauci saying there was no

1:33 evidence when Senator Johnson produces a big pile of studies showing there's all kinds of evidence for the efficacy of Ivermectin. And that's not even without talking about the right to try. And we've got that same situation now with the potential of Ivermectin treating cancers, but many people simply aren't allowed to try. Was Fauci involved in sabotaging Ivermectin was this so that he could demonstrate that there were no treatments for COVID-19 because emergency use authorization could only be granted if there were no effective treatments to allow the vaccines to come in. And therefore they had to disprove the efficacy of Ivermectin in COVID-19. These are really big questions but of

2:19 course simple questions, technical questions and he refuses to answer them all. I think this is just outrageous but watch the clip now. >> Throughout the pandemic I always pushed early treatment. Um Yeah, we've got things in in in here where you know you were really concerned about Remdesivir because it was it was untested but hydroxychloroquine yeah, it was an approved drug you know maybe some safety issues but we had great deal of experience with it. All of a sudden you had the Surgisphere study that was retracted within 2 weeks cuz it was completely false totally blew up the use of hydroxychloroquine and then when it comes to Ivermectin which by the way because I had close contact by so many people

3:06 I referred them to doctors actually had the courage and capacity to treat vaccine injured individuals it works. But I was going to ask you were you involved in the uh FDA attack on Ivermectin. You had a interview on CNN on August 29th of 2021 where again I I just don't want to take time to find the exact quote but you you know said there's no evidence. There's no evidence that Ivermectin is helpful. On that exact same day and I I've got the I've got the studies right here. There was a website that was tracking the the random controlled studies

3:55 They're here. They are. Showing 60 70% efficacy of ivermectin. The same day you say there's no evidence. There was all kinds of evidence. Loved ones had to go to hospitals had to sue hospitals. Just would you try it? So, I would I would want to know you know to what extent were you involved in sabotaging hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and and did you do that because you knew the only way you could get an emergency use authorization for these drugs these experimental gene therapy was if there was no effective treatment. You couldn't get the emergency use authorization. So, is that is that why you helped sabotage

4:42 these cheap generic drugs in favor of remdesivir, which by the way nurses Are you aware of the fact that nurses called it run death is near? >> On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. >> But let let me end on this note because this this just came to light. You know, we've got 11 million pages of documents. We also have other people who were in the room. Uh but uh Now you you actually lied to your you lied to your you lied to your own diary. Um On March 27th, 2020, you wrote in your diary, "To my surprise yesterday, the POTUS sent a letter to governors outlining a plan to reopen county by county while monitoring the spread of virus in

5:28 the low-risk counties. This was half-baked and never shown to Deborah I before it was sent out." So, so we have evidence that in fact you not you were fully aware of it and certainly approved if not authored it. So, I would simply ask you, I mean, is that is that true? I mean, did you literally lie to your own diary? Did Did Did Did you know of that letter signed up to governors about reopening county by county? And again, Mr. Chairman, I'd ask you to ask the the witness to just answer that one simple question. >> On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

6:14 >> I guess it get a bit tedious after a while, doesn't it? But, hopefully something will be done about this. And uh engagement will be facilitated on at least a technical level. Um I don't know how this is tolerated, to be quite honest. Thank you for watching.