د. محمد العامري يتحدث عن اساليب القيادة الإدارية

0:00 Okay, now I have a question. What are the leadership methods that we can use and that can affect the leadership process and make it more effective? These leadership methods are important. Why? These methods may represent the way the administrative leader in the event of change with others. Najeeb al-Nimr or Or we can say that they have Saoud bin Mohammed Al-Nimr and others They put a book called "The Fundamentals of Management" In this book they talk about the administrative works and their nature This book was published by the Shigiri Library, the fifth edition The leadership behavior is a set of behaviors that the leader starts within the organization as a result of a

0:50 set of pressures that occur within the organization. from inside the administration or from outside the administration because you know that the organization always has two environments, an internal environment and an external environment. This pressure directly affects the practical behavior of the organization, whether it is positive or negative. Therefore, the role of the leader is to establish balance in these behaviors. In a book, as we said, Saoud bin Mohammed and others in the administration, the foundations and functions of the administration, who we said that they talk about this style, They thought we have a set of methods The first method is called the autocratic method The word autocrat means the extrovert This method is centered around the leader As you see in the picture with me now It is all centered around the leader The leader is the core of

1:39 the operations within the organization, and therefore the leader sees that he is the only one who sees the vision, he is the only one who determines the plan, he is the only one who draws the goals, he is the only one who gives the operational evidence, he is the only one who evaluates the work, he is the only one who determines the work differences, whether it is accomplished or not. All operations are the role of the leader. How do you know this? If you enter an administration and you find all the work in the leader's office, Employees do not have a performance axis, and therefore the leadership style becomes an autocratic style, called the authoritarian style. The second style is the democratic style. Democracy means participation, there is participation. The leader and the employees all participate in the selection. Therefore, we have to make a mutual decision between the two, and it may be successful or not. There are good

2:27 situations in which democracy is not in it. And we have a non-directional leadership style, that is, the leader makes all the burden on the employees. They are the ones who make decisions, they are the ones who put the machines, they make the framework to determine the plans and procedures. Here comes the question. When we talk about if you

3:17 follow Which one of the positions will you choose the best and most suitable for you? So I have a position of democracy, I have a position of non-director, and I have a position of dictatorship. Just a moment, I want to clarify the difference between the word democracy and the word Shura. We have a problem in the Islamic world that some of the brothers mix between the word Shura and the word democracy. What is the difference between democracy and the word Shura? Shura means the effort with the presence of a text. The leader consults a group of advisors, but if we have a text mentioned in the Holy Quran, a text mentioned in the laws and regulations, no effort, no democracy. Democracy is the majority opinion. For example, if we have alcohol,

4:05 There is a verse in the Holy Quran that prohibits alcohol. So there is no democracy to vote on it. This democracy means that it is not a democracy. Democracy means the majority opinion. The same applies to administrative systems. In the administrative system, What the group agreed on is called democracy, but the regime is autocratic and therefore needs a council. So I have a difference between democracy and the council. I have three leadership methods that the leader took. The democratic regime is to be in partnership with the group. The rope on the rope is called not directed, that the leader is completely away from work. The dictatorial regime is to have a dictatorship. I will explain these three in more than one way, but the difference is that I will explain it with an experience that happened to me in my life. Once I wanted to

4:52 give training courses to officers, and I had courses, I gave them course after course, and I gave them to a group of soldiers, a group of people, and the officer always paid attention to the course. I met a group of officers to explain to them. The first type, I have a course I will present, called the course of self-esteem building. I will present it five times, five groups, each time a group of soldiers is involved with me, and there is an officer with the rank of a deputy, who is responsible for these officers. The first system, the democratic system, when the course begins, what happens? I was sitting in the hall, I was installing the device and suddenly the officer came in and said to me, "Peace be upon you." I said, "How are you, doctor?" He said, "Do you want me to start now or later?" "Start now." I told him to notice the sentence. "Shall we start now, doctor, or later?" "Shall we start now?" He said, "Let's start now." He seemed to

5:40 be teasing me, but in fact, what was he doing? He just forced me to start now. I said, "Let's start now." He went out and said, "Come on, guys." Do you want to start now or later? The doctor is waiting for you, please start So now what is he doing? As if he is a shahour but he is a waltz This is the democratic system Then if they enter, he will not sit in front Where does he sit? In the middle In the middle of the present He sits and starts to monitor those who do all of them And yet he feels that they are the ones who do the monitoring He has a leader He gives the leader a leader Or as they say, the leader gives him the ability to monitor the rest of them And his role is the operation of the meeting So what is this? I will start with the hadith, I will present to the participants, the soldiers with him, how he says: Peace be upon you, may God's

6:26 mercy and blessings be upon you, guys, it is very important for us to have self-esteem, especially as soldiers, and I hope that you will train, that you will develop, bring a paper, bring a pen, write everything that the doctor says, it is very important, guys, you know that this training, the ministry is invested in money, and we must know how the training was done, after this course, I want from you reports on the level that you learned, I want you to say what you think, Did you benefit or not? That's why I will wait for each of you to give a report on the course. Later, he wanted a report, but what he really wanted was a dream course in the university that is their responsibility. The second type is a non-directional type. This type is completely different. I am in the hall, suddenly he enters, "Peace be upon you, may peace be upon you." He said, "Do you want to start, doctor?" "When you want to start, talk to me with God." He sat

7:13 down and started talking to Saadet al-Naqeeb. He said, "Ahmed, let's get the guys in." The guys came in, and he didn't care. They came in and sat down. He had an open eye and a closed eye. How? If someone approached him, he would be arrested. He was quiet and followed them. When he started talking to them, he said, "Do you want to introduce yourself?" They said, "No, I don't need it." "Just start." This is a model. The third model is the dictatorial model. Notice the dictatorial model. While I was in the hall, I put my device on and hear outside. I say, "What happened outside?" "What happened?" He held them outside, "Get ready, get ready." Then he entered, he said, "Doctor, do you want to start?" "Let's

8:02 start, let's start." I'm scared, I became scared. Then the prisoners entered the hall and sat down. Then he stood in front of them and said, "Guys, The training is very important, the doctor will give us a lecture, any one of you after the lecture must give me a report on the program, anyone who does not give a program, he can stop and stop, then he goes to sit in the last one, the last one, do you think why? Because the trainers are sitting with you They can't run after them, they are afraid that they will run after them, and they will be there to watch over them. By the way, they can leave us and leave, they are not afraid because we are sitting behind them. These are the three systems, these three systems are all present in our lives, not only in the military, in the military, in the administrative side, but we are always concerned about the military side, why? Derker, the father of administrative science, has two hundred and sixty books in

8:51 administrative science. Derker says that administrative science is military science because it is a correct and binding science, so if you want to understand administrative science, understand military science. So we have methods, we will talk about each method The first method is the method of autocratic leadership or the administrative leadership This method and this style is on the different thing This method is a leader with a complete focus in the field of making decisions, working and developing policies It is closer to individualism, everything is in its own direction, away from collective participation Equal to this autocratic leadership method The following advantages: First, it leads to a weak interaction between individuals because everything is only related to the leader. The lack of a moral spirit among individuals, the leader alone is the one who produces the orders. It encourages the lack of contact and weakens the connections. It shows hostile situations, conflicts, and conflicts, and we have more organizational conflict within the

9:40 organization, and thus we get a defensive weakness towards work. The second problem The non-directional leadership, or what we call the "line on the side", is suitable for this type of scientific environments that are highly specialized, universities or others, you can't adjust the rest of the doctors, and thus you give a kind of non-directional leadership. It is based on the absence of a leader, each one does his best with the best context, so that he does not need guidance or follow-up, and without any interference in the work of the leaders. Equal to this system is the following: weak guidance,

10:29 weak control, How does the leader appear in an unguided system? He always leaves the rope on the other side, the direction is absent, there is no reliable surveillance, the leader is far from the group. The leadership system is not the same as the leadership system of the leader. The other is the democratic style, which encourages participation, and encourages the participation of all individuals. It is a task achievement, and it is the development of individuals. It is encouraged to share knowledge, contributing to the development of individuals and organizations. The other style is the non-directional style, which is the abundance of objections and suggestions. It is the democracy of individuals, and sometimes it is impossible to make a decision. Therefore, it is up to the leader to have the ability to vary in making decisions according to his own needs. in the democratic model that allows participation, listens to the opinions of the leaders, and the spirit of the team is in

11:16 it, the leader is one of the group. Come on, let's compare the democratic model and the dictatorial model in leadership. So, not only that I do not believe in any of them better, I believe that all of them are excellent, but what governs us is the context. According to the context, we use it. The democratic model has a high level of quality because it focuses on quality. But notice, I ask you, time sometimes and achievement does not happen. We focus on quality, then we forget who is the achievement. The dictatorial model has a lower quality level, but there is achievement. The democratic model is a high degree of employment satisfaction. The dictatorial model is a degree less than the employment satisfaction. The democratic model is a work ratio that does not change if the leader is changed. The dictatorial model is not. If the leader is not present, there is no work. People feel a distortion because they are used to the leader being a watchdog. The democratic model decides with the group of leaders

12:04 what to do. As for the dictatorial model, the leader decides on his own. The democratic model gives the opportunity to start the opinion. The dictatorial model does not. It determines on his own what the rest should do. The democratic model cares a lot about knowing each person's long-term plan and understanding it. The dictatorial model does not care much about explaining goals. He has everything he sees, he himself sees that these patterns are present in him. So now we have a set of patterns, these patterns control our administrative behavior and control our leadership behavior.